· Public charity
Cpps Heritage Mission Fund
Administer its funds in order to support ministerial endeavors and other charitable purposes that reflect the charism, mission, and values of the sisters of the precious blood of dayton, ohio.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $60k
- $10k–50k86 grants · $1.7M
- $50k–250k12 grants · $728k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GOOD KNIGHTS INC | $100,000 |
| ST JOHN VIANNEY PARISH FLINT | $88,000 |
| WEDONTWASTE INC | $60,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIAL SERVICES INC | $60,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTIES | $60,000 |
| RISE UP INDUSTRIES | $60,000 |
| REFUGE FOR WOMEN INC | $50,000 |
| ST JEANNE DE LESTONNAC FREE CLINIC | $50,000 |
| BRIGID'S PATH | $50,000 |
| CATHOLIC MOBILIZING NETWORK | $50,000 |
| EL PUENTE EDUCATIONAL CENTER | $50,000 |
| SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CINCINNATI | $50,000 |
| FINDLAY HOPE HOUSE FOR THE HOMELESS INC | $47,500 |
| LIVING WATERS INTERNATIONAL INC | $44,900 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SHIAWASSEE AND GENESEE COUNTIES | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
148 repeat relationships — 64 still active in FY2024, 84 since wound down; 42 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $984k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LWLIVING WATERS INTERNATIONAL INC7× · 2018–2024 · $769k · revenue +82%
- GNGOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE6× · 2018–2023 · $635k · revenue +113%
- PBPRECIOUS BLOOD MINISTRY OF RECONCILIATION NFP6× · 2017–2024 · $365k · revenue +321%
Funded once
- HFHARVEST FOR HOPE INCone grant, 2018 · $60k
- ABAFRICAN BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF NDANDAone grant, 2021 · $55k
- FFFood For The Journey Projectgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $54k · revenue +85%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide shelter and basic needs for homeless people. while fostering self-respect and human dignity, samaritan house will encourage the residents' efforts to find employment and housing.
Provide safe housing and training to women who were victims of addiction,sex trafficking, abuse, homelesness or previously incarcerated.
Food and shelter to the homeless and groceries/clothing assistance to poverty stricken households
Marian house is a holistic, healing community for women and their children who are in need of housing and support services. we provide a safe, sober, and loving environment that challenges women to respect and love themselves, confront…
Harvest Home transforms the lives of unhoused, pregnant women and their children by providing housing, support, and programs that equip women to become great mothers. In December 2024, Harvest Home welcomed our first family (pregnant woman…
To serve women struggling with unplanned pregnancy by providing housing, food and life training to meet the physical, emotional and spiritual needs of the mother and baby.
Mary's Mercy Center reaffirms the dignity of the poor and marginalized by providing food, clothing, and transitional housing to homeless families and individuals.
To equip and empower single, pregnant women with a safe, nurturing home, pregancy care, life skills training and Christian discipleship to establish a sold foundation for two lives.
House of Good Shepherd serves with love and compassion women and children affected by domestic violence by offering a safe place with opportunities for emotional, educational and spiritual growth, giving hope and continued support for a…
The good samaritan house enriches the lives of homeless women and children by supporting them in a loving christian environment. while providing safe and temporary housing, basic human needs and supportive services, the good samaritan…
Magnificat Houses, Inc. offers a welcoming community where those needing housing, food and mental health programs can grow in stability, productivity and independence.
Cathedral center's mission is to provide a safe environment for women and families, while working to end homelessness one life at a time. the cathedral center serves unaccompanied women and families with children who are homeless or…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Spring Shelter Inc and the most unlike its peers is Baird Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
280 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 280 of the 334 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LIVING WATERS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE ↗
- Who funds PRECIOUS BLOOD MINISTRY OF RECONCILIATION NFP ↗
- Who funds THE BRUNNER LITERACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds DIGNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION-INLAND EMPIRE ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT CHARITY MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds LESTONNAC FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds MERCY MANOR INC ↗
- Who funds FINDLAY HOPE HOUSE FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGID'S PATH INC ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF DAYTON OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds EL PUENTE EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds SAN CARLOS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH'S NEW LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA Dayton ↗
- Who funds JOSEPHS HOME ↗
- Who funds EARTHLINKS INC ↗
- Who funds Affecting Community Transformation ↗
- Who funds Healthy Moms & Babes Inc ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Emmaus Ministries ↗
- Who funds THOUSAND CURRENTS ↗
- Who funds Madonna Mission ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION - DAYTON ↗
- Who funds Friends in Solidarity Inc ↗
- Who funds Unlocking Communities Inc ↗
- Who funds Wesley Community Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SHIAWASSEE AND GENESEE COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds SISTERS IN SHELTER ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC MOBILIZING NETWORK ↗
- Who funds HOMEFULL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mathile Family Foundation · The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · Dayton Foundation Depository · Iddings Benevolent Trust Xxxxx5009 · The United Way of the Greater Dayton Area · Gerald M & Carole a Miller Family Foundation · Miami Valley Hospital · Levin Family Foundation · The CareSource Foundation · WPCU Sunshine Community Fund · The Dayton Power and Light Company Foundation Dba Aes Ohio Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cpps Heritage Mission Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Diaper Bank of Connecticut Inc — 49% of income from government
- Cumacecho Inc — 25% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.