Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Invited Foundation

To utilize our platform and resources to strengthen communities and enrich lives on a national and local scale.

$2.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
89
Grants FY2024still arriving
25
States reached
$393k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Human Services$2.9MRecreation & Sports$1.9MHealth$1.1MEmployment$1.0MEducation$451kCrime & Legal$428kPhilanthropy$369kYouth Development$345kOther$0
02FY2024 · 89 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k23 grants · $154k
  • $10k–50k52 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+1 grant · $393k
$17,597
Median grant
25
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMPLOYEE PARTNER CARE FDN$392,794
HAAM$113,621
THE BOOT CAMPAIGN INC$104,172
OPERATION ONCE IN A LIFETIME$94,067
FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION$92,628
CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER CC$91,797
PHOENIX CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$89,111
CHILDRENS MEDICAL CTR FOUND$84,172
ANTHEM ROTARY FOUNDATION$67,788
JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUND$67,098
DEFENDERS OF FREEDOM$61,411
THE WARREN CENTER$59,306
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LA$58,058
THE BENJAMIN OLLADA FOUND$50,285
MOMENTOUS INSTITUTE$46,445
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ERIK HITE FOUNDATION: $64k → 15%GOD FOR ALL: $6k → 7%DREAM 33: $14k → 7%BILL WILSON CENTER: $6k → 8%A BRIGHTER DAY: $31k → 9%HAAM: $114k → 16%CARING CHILDREN CLOTHING CHIL: $15k → 10%KIDS IN DISTRESS INC: $8k → 13%FRIENDS OF NOCVTC: $18k → 5%NORTH OAKLAND VETERANS TREAT: $18k → 8%COBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN: $27k → 16%THE SUB ZERO MISSION: $27k → 9%UPLIFT NORTHWEST: $7k → 9%GIG HARBOR PENINSULA FISH: $12k → 9%PADS TO HOPE INC: $27k → 14%BOXES OF BASICS: $21k → 7%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $14k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $7k → 14%GERRYS CAFE: $36k → 14%ONE SIMPLE WISH: $9k → 11%VETERANS MOVING FORWARD: $12k → 4%VARIETY-THE CHILDRENS CHAR: $9k → 11%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTR: $39k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $7k → 14%VETERANS MOVING FORWARD: $7k → 4%TIP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $9k → 13%THE FIRST TEE OF ORANGE CTY: $17k → 10%HOME STRETCH: $13k → 13%TOYS FOR TOTS: $22k → 9%SERVE OUR WILLING WARRIORS: $7k → 7%OC UNITED: $21k → 10%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LA: $58k → 14%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTR: $36k → 14%FOSTER CHILDRENS RESOURCE: $31k → 14%DEFENDERS OF FREEDOM: $61k → 14%CLUBCORP EMPLOYEE PTR CARE FD: $737k → 14%EMPLOYEE PARTNER CARE FDN: $393k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NC
SC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Invited Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 30% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 33% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Invited Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.6M · 41 repeat orgs$6.0M to everyone else

41 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 58 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
174

Total granted

$3.6M
$4.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+21%

Still filing today

66%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationRecreation & SportsAnimalsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    CLUBCORP EMPLOYEE PARTNER ASSISTANCE FUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +16% · 66% of their budget
  • HA
    HUMBLE AREA ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $205k · revenue +8%
  • CA
    CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $169k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • CE
    CLUBCORP EMPLOYEE PARTNER CARE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $943k
  • E
    EPCF
    one grant, 2020 · $668k
  • CC
    CASA CHILD ADVOCATES OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
    one grant, 2021 · $87k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope for the Warriors

The mission of the Hope For The Warriors is to enhance the quality of life for United States Service Members and their families who have been adversely affected by injuries or death in the line of duty. See Schedule O for continuation

Philanthropy
2
Pets for Vets Inc

Pets for Vets enriches the lives of veterans by creating a life-changing Super Bond with expertly selected and trained shelter or rescue pets. It provides ongoing expert support to ensure a reciprocal and thriving partnership at no cost to…

Public Benefit
3
Companions for Heroes

To champion public awareness of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and challenges confronting our countrys heroes and rally support for shelter animal adoption by connecting heroes and companions.

Human Services
4
Special Forces Foundation

The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.

Philanthropy
5
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
6
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
7
Troops First Foundation Incorporated

To develop, operate, and support a synergistic group of wellness, quality of life, and event-based initiatives in support of today's combat-wounded military personnel and their families, while facilitating a greater recognition and…

Public Benefit
8
Special Operators Transition Foundation Inc

The special operators transition foundation ("sotf") assists special operation forces veterans transition from the military into their next successful career.

Public Benefit
9
Team Impact Inc

Team impact is the only u.s. nonprofit that tackles the emotional trauma and social isolation experienced by children facing serious and chronic illnesses by matching them with a college athletic team. because no child should be sidelined…

Philanthropy
10
Soldiers' Angels

Soldiers' angels provides aid, comfort, and resources to the military, veterans, and their families.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Children's Cancer Fund of Dallas inc

Children's cancer fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in north texas.

Health
12
It's About the Warriors Foundation

To assist and empower all post 9/11 veterans and their families from the tri-state area, regardless if they have been wounded or have been deployed, with our various programs thus, leading them to a successful and enriched life.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is DREAMS33 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyMilitary Veterans SupportCancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Domestic Violence ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Food Banks and PantriesAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity Food PantriesEquine Therapy ProgramsYmca Youth DevelopmentCommunity College Foundatio…Public Library OperationsCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Environmental Conservation …Affordable Housing Construc…Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Youth Sports ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%7%<5yr16%12%5–10yr20%26%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr10%23%35–55yr13%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%4%<5yr16%7%5–10yr20%45%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr10%16%35–55yr13%10%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/147
the rest of the field
15%
20,232/136,657

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

135 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 135 of the 274 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
132/135
Grantees still filing
78/135
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CLUBCORP EMPLOYEE PARTNER CARE FOUNDATION — $943,296 · OtherCLUBCORP EMPLOYEE PARTNER CARE FOUNDATIONEPCF — $667,720 · OtherEPCFCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC — $169,077 · Other+124 more — $3,249,223 · Other+124 moreCLUBCORP EMPLOYEE PARTNER ASSISTANCE FUND — $1,129,915 · Human ServicesCLUBCORP EMPLOYEE PARTNER …HUMBLE AREA ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC — $204,528 · Human ServicesHUMBLE AREA ASSISTANCE MIN…ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES — $89,507 · Human ServicesNETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC — $74,346 · Human Services+24 more — $613,061 · Human Services+24 morePhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation — $89,111 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $84,172 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM OF TEXAS — $71,299 · HealthCORNERSTONE MINISTRIES INC — $65,771 · HealthCure Childhood Cancer Inc — $46,943 · HealthVETERANS CENTER OF NORTH TEXAS INC — $42,234 · HealthKinsley Adelynn Foundation — $42,089 · HealthWOMENS AUXILIARY TO THE CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER — $37,807 · HealthPEDIATRIC VICTORY FOUNDATION — $36,913 · HealthCHESAPEAKE REGIONAL MEDICAL GROUP — $27,819 · HealthCHOC FOUNDATION — $27,236 · Health+8 more — $91,602 · HealthFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $156,850 · EducationNORTH TEXAS JR GOLF AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $80,745 · EducationBENJAMIN OLLADA FOUNDATION — $77,769 · EducationEDUCATION FOR TOMORROW ALLIANCE — $56,094 · EducationTEE IT UP FOR THE TROOPS INC — $46,277 · EducationOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC — $28,547 · EducationJAMES RYAN AND HARRISON VAN EPPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $21,959 · EducationGreater Cleveland Junior Golf — $17,686 · Education+2 more — $24,910 · EducationAnthem Rotary Foundation — $157,995 · PhilanthropyTHE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION — $67,098 · PhilanthropyRebecca Lynn Cutler Legacy of Life Foundation — $35,260 · PhilanthropyROOSTERS FOUNDATION OF ORANGE COUNTY — $29,040 · PhilanthropyThe Piedmont Charitable Foundation — $26,726 · PhilanthropyNMDP FOUNDATION — $17,597 · PhilanthropySEMINOLE REGION CHARITY GOLF TOURNAMENT INC — $13,230 · PhilanthropyTHE BOOT CAMPAIGN INC — $124,172 · Public BenefitOPERATION ONCE IN A LIFETIME — $94,067 · Public BenefitFOR THE TROOPS — $31,448 · Public BenefitMERGING VETS AND PLAYERS — $16,170 · Public BenefitSEMPER K9 ASSISTANCE DOGS — $10,307 · Public BenefitMomentous Institute — $115,345 · Youth DevelopmentWILDERNESS CAMPING AND RETREAT CENTER — $54,366 · Youth DevelopmentANDREW S RODDICK FOUNDATION INC — $22,832 · Youth DevelopmentIRVING POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE — $15,734 · Youth Development
Other$5,029,316Human Services$2,111,357Health$662,996Education$510,837Philanthropy$346,946Public Benefit$276,164Youth Development$208,277

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLUBCORP EMPLOYEE PARTNER ASSISTANCE FUND — $1,129,915 over 2y, 66% of budgetHUMBLE AREA ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC — $204,528 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC — $169,077 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetAnthem Rotary Foundation — $157,995 over 2y, 56% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $156,850 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOOT CAMPAIGN INC — $124,172 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetMomentous Institute — $115,345 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOPERATION ONCE IN A LIFETIME — $94,067 over 1y, 14% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES — $89,507 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation — $89,111 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $84,172 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WORTH JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INC — $83,245 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetNORTH TEXAS JR GOLF AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $80,745 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetNETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC — $74,346 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM OF TEXAS — $71,299 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION — $67,098 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCORNERSTONE MINISTRIES INC — $65,771 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetERIK HITE FOUNDATION INC — $64,313 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetDefenders of Freedom — $61,411 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE WARREN CENTER INC — $59,306 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEDUCATION FOR TOMORROW ALLIANCE — $56,094 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area — $56,094 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCure Childhood Cancer Inc — $46,943 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTEE IT UP FOR THE TROOPS INC — $46,277 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetVETERANS CENTER OF NORTH TEXAS INC — $42,234 over 1y, 16% of budgetKinsley Adelynn Foundation — $42,089 over 1y, 54% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $40,775 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY JUSTICE CENTER OF SONOMA COUNTY FOUNDATION — $38,165 over 1y, 12% of budgetWOMENS AUXILIARY TO THE CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER — $37,807 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPEDIATRIC VICTORY FOUNDATION — $36,913 over 1y, 49% of budgetFriends of the North Oakland County Veterans Treatment Court — $36,281 over 2y, 25% of budgetCOACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION — $35,994 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBREWING OPPORTUNITIES NFP DBA GERRYS CAFE — $35,923 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetRebecca Lynn Cutler Legacy of Life Foundation — $35,260 over 2y, 39% of budgetAPPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $33,433 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC — $32,032 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFOR THE TROOPS — $31,448 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetA Brighter Day — $31,409 over 1y, 22% of budgetWMBG AREA MEDICAL ASSISTANCE CORP — $30,302 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetINJURED POLICE OFFICERS FUND — $29,890 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetROOSTERS FOUNDATION OF ORANGE COUNTY — $29,040 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC — $28,547 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHESAPEAKE REGIONAL MEDICAL GROUP — $27,819 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPADS TO HOPE DBA-JOURNEYS THE ROAD HOME — $27,236 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION — $27,236 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC — $27,019 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SUB ZERO MISSION — $26,808 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetThe Piedmont Charitable Foundation — $26,726 over 2y, 73% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationCommunities Foundatio…Pga Tour First Tee Fo…World Golf Foundation…Insurance Industry Ch…United Way of Metropo…Texas Instruments Fou…The Jordan Spieth Fam…Community Foundation …The Rees-Jones Founda…Hillcrest FoundationIn-N-Out Burgers Foun…
The Dallas FoundationTX20.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Pga Tour First Tee Foundation Inc · World Golf Foundation Inc · Insurance Industry Charitable Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Jordan Spieth Family Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Invited Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Isles Inc — 21% of income from government
  • The Crisis Center of Tampa Bay Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Kids in Distress Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
32report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Invited Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Invited Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 274 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines