How much did PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC reported 114 grants totaling $12,080,158 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC based?

PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC is based in FL.

PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC

To impact the lives of young people by providing educational programs that build character and instill life- enhancing values through the game of golf.

$12M

Granted FY2024

114

Grants

Communities

$675k

Largest

01What you fund

0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.

Recreation & Sports$29MYouth Development$5.9MPhilanthropy$3.8MEducation$1.8MHuman Services$1.2MCommunity Improvement$312kArts & Culture$217kHealth$185kOther$4.9M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

imalos angeles

2021

neighborsput christianchristian principleshealthpersonal growthaccessinstruction

2022

studentsmontereyimalake eriechristiancommittedneighbors

2023

lake erieroanoke valleypersonal growthparticipantsjuniorspositively life-enhancingteaching

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 114 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k9 grants · $61k
$10k–50k55 grants · $1.5M
$50k–250k43 grants · $4.3M
$250k+7 grants · $3.2M

$42,000

Median grant

States reached

$125M

Total assets

Largest grants

Twin Cities Junior Golf Program$675,000
First Tee New York Inc$600,500
Houston Golf Association Youth Program$547,000
Children's Golf FoundationInc$508,110
First Tee of Chicago Foundation$318,430
FORE LA Kids Inc$308,441
Indiana Golf Foundation Inc$252,000
Richmond First Tee$213,433
Seattle Jr Golf Foundation$199,142
First Tee of Atlanta Inc$196,370
Tennessee Golf Foundation$192,674
Future Talent of Silicon Valley$182,000
Golf Fore Life Skills$171,250
The First Tee of Greater Philadelphia Inc$168,900
The First Tee of Washington DC$166,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 37% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$47M · 138 repeat orgs$606k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against -40% for the ones you funded once.

138 repeat relationships — 107 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

138

Total granted

$47M

$420k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%

-40%

Still filing today

93%

45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $186k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Recreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TC
Twin Cities Junior Golf Program
5× · 2020–2024 · $3.6M · revenue +422% · 78% of their budget
FT
First Tee New York Inc
5× · 2020–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +9%
HG
Houston Golf Association Youth Program
4× · 2021–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +51% · 80% of their budget

Funded once

TF
The First Tee Greater Houston Inc
one grant, 2020 · $139k · revenue -20% · 78% of their budget
CG
Connecticut Golf Foundation
one grant, 2022 · $115k
NW
New Wading River Country Club LLC
one grant, 2020 · $36k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Golf My Future Mygame

Our mission is to educate young people in the game of golf and to expose them to careers in the golfing industry

Arts & Culture

Indianapolis Junior Golf Foundation

—

First Tee of Miami-Dade

Impacting the lives of young people, by providing educational programs that build character, instill life-enhancing values and promote healthy choices through the game of golf.

Youth Development

All Abilities Golf Academy

Recreation & Sports

Junior Cup Golf

Provide developmental opportunities for junior golfers to play and learn the game of golf. activities include forming community based junior golf teams to train and compete together as well as hosting instructional clinics.

Recreation & Sports

Wpga Junior Foundation Inc

To provide positive opportunities, enjoyment, and education to juniors in the game of golf. the mission will be accomplished through tournaments, clinics, camps, academies, scholarships, and grants.

Recreation & Sports

Tennessee Golf Foundation

To promote golf and its life-enhancing values with an emphasis on teaching the youth, veterans and the disadvantaged.

Arts & Culture

Sl Gee Ll Foundation Inc

to provide a pipeline to academic excell

Recreation & Sports

Midnight Golf Program

MGP is dedicated to equpping determined young adults through life skills training, proactive coaching, long term mentoring and the deicipline of golf in order to succeed in college, in their careers and beyond.

Youth Development

South Carolina Junior Golf Association

To promote preserve and serve the game of junior golf

—

Golden Gate Park Golf

The mission of the organization is to use the golden gate park golf course to provide creative and innovative programs to disadvantaged san francisco youth and the general community.

Youth Development

Delaware State Golf Association

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idaho Youth Golf Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Future Citizens Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%3/231

the rest of the field

11%

206,161/1,819,334

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

153 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

150/153

Grantees still filing

126/153

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Recreation & Sports$29,030,284Youth Development$5,909,843Other$5,311,918Philanthropy$3,849,585Education$1,791,481Human Services$1,174,550Community Improvement$311,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

World Golf Foundation IncFL254.7× affinity131 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: World Golf Foundation Inc · Pga Tour Inc · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · The Lpga Foundation · American Junior Golf Foundation Inc · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Round It Up America Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · The George W Bush Foundation · Good Sports Inc · Digital Promise Global · Pga Tour Charities Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

19get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FORE LA Kids Inc.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +68% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 861571574 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FORE LA Kids Inc, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 95% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Pga Tour First Tee Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Pga Tour First Tee Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

153 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Pga Tour First Tee Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

153 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Pga Tour First Tee Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph