How much did THE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

THE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION reported 21 grants totaling $1,638,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is THE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION based?

THE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION is based in TX.

THE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

THE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION

THE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION is a 501(c)3 nonprofit corporation established to offer a platform for jordan and others to lend time, help grow awareness and offer financial support for four philanthropic areas: individuals with special needs, junior golf, military support and pediatric cancer.

$1.6M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$500k

Largest

01What you fund

0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$2.2MRecreation & Sports$1.8MReligion$716kHuman Services$697kPublic Benefit$430kEducation$420kAnimals$180kInternational$120kCommunity Improvement$65kOther$2.3M

02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k9 grants · $258k
$50k–250k10 grants · $630k
$250k+2 grants · $750k

$50,000

Median grant

States reached

$11M

Total assets

Largest grants

ALSACST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$500,000
COBBS CREEK FOUNDATION$250,000
NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION$100,000
HEROES FOR CHILDREN$85,000
UNITED ROCKS$75,000
I AM A GOLFER FOUNDATION$70,000
PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC$50,000
OPERATION SECOND CHANCE$50,000
FOSTER KIDS CHARITY$50,000
BOOT CAMPAIGN$50,000
NOTRE DAME SCHOOL$50,000
THE WARREN CENTER$50,000
THE NORTH TEXAS PGA$40,000
WHEELCHAIRS FOR WARRIORS$35,000
K9S FOR WARRIORS$30,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $623k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$5.5M · 45 repeat orgs$3.4M to everyone else

45 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.5M

$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%

+45%

Still filing today

78%

89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationPublic BenefitReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CM
CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
2× · 2020–2022 · $730k · revenue +422%
TN
THE NORTH TEXAS PGA
8× · 2017–2024 · $598k · revenue +106%
OS
OPERATION SECOND CHANCE INC
5× · 2017–2024 · $300k · revenue +294%

Funded once

TF
THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER AUSTINgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +44%
CM
CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
one grant, 2017 · $185k · revenue -63%
4K
4E KENNELS HEALING HEARTS INC
one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +21% · 25% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Children's Cancer Fund of Dallas inc

Children's Cancer Fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in North Texas.

Health

Camp for All Foundation

To provide an environment for people with challenging illnesses or special needs to discover life.

Youth Development

Children's Sports Medicine

The Foundation provides sports injury related medical services primarily to (see Schedule O) patients at Boston Children's Hospital and at satellite locations. The Foundation also provides care for patients regardless of their ability to…

—

One Summit Inc

One Summit's mission is to help childhood cancer patients build courage, self-confidence, and resilience through experiential learning and mentorship with a U.S. Navy Seal. Our experiential learning takes place in the form of indoor rock…

Health

The Outdoor Adventure Foundation Inc

The outdoor adventure foundation is a 501(c)(3) non profit foundation providing hunting and fishing adventures for children and young adults under the age of 25 with cancer or other life threatening illness, also providing adventures for…

Human Services

Caddies for Kids

Our mission is to transform junior golf by providing a platform for junior players to gain access to exceptional high school caddies that provide youth mentorship for the future of the game.

Recreation & Sports

Gamechanger Charity

Gamechanger leverages technology and innovation to help children and their families who encounter life threatening illnesses.

Health

Dsf Dream a Dream Therapeutic Horsemanship

We are a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit dedicated to providing equine facilitated therapies to children with developmental disabilities (with a special emphasis in autism) in the greater austin area.

Religion

Austin Wade Foundation

Children battling cancer

Unclassified

Golf for Special Needs Children Inc

Golf for special needs children, inc. is an organization that seeks to help special needs children and their families cope with expenses they may incur.

Human Services

Lilys Pad

The mission of Lily's Pad is to provide immunocompromised children with a clean environment where they can enjoy typical childhood activities, while offering their caregivers and parents a place to rest and connect. Lily's Pad is home to…

Youth Development

Camps for Kids

Camps for Kids' mission is to ensure that no Kansas City-area child is turned away from summer camp because of low income or physical, medical or developmental disability.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids Building Character Inc and the most unlike its peers is Young Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

4%4/113

the rest of the field

13%

17,174/136,691

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

107 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

97/107

Grantees still filing

76/107

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$2,205,000Other$2,636,100Recreation & Sports$1,798,160Religion$715,750Human Services$696,600Public Benefit$430,000Education$420,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX44.3× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · The Rees-Jones Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Pga Tour Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Elizabeth Toon Charities · Hillcrest Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Theodore and Beulah Beasley Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MICAELAS ARMY FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing; revenue up 3.7× since.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 460923823 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MICAELAS ARMY FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 72% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Jordan Spieth Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Jordan Spieth Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

107 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Jordan Spieth Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

THE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

107 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Jordan Spieth Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph