· Private foundation
Hill-Snowdon Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k91 grants · $353k
- $10k–50k79 grants · $2.6M
- $50k–250k4 grants · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| ALTERNATE ROOTS INC | $75,000 |
| THE EMBODIMENT INSTITUTE INCORPORATED | $50,000 |
| NEW VENTURE FUND | $50,000 |
| WASHINGTON INTERFAITH NETWORK | $45,000 |
| SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE | $45,000 |
| BREAD FOR THE CITY | $45,000 |
| SOUTHERN RURAL BLACK WOMEN'S INITIATIVE | $45,000 |
| MOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT | $45,000 |
| EMPOWER DC | $45,000 |
| WORKERS CENTER FOR RACIAL JUSTICE | $45,000 |
| LEGAL SERVICES FOR PRISONERS WITH CHILDREN | $45,000 |
| LATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON DC | $45,000 |
| ORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOOD EQUITY | $45,000 |
| AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER | $45,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
122 repeat relationships — 76 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $376k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $358k · revenue +11%
NEO Philanthropy Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $349k · revenue +27%- WCWorkers Center For Racial Just NFP5× · 2020–2024 · $338k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- GFGroundswell Fundone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -25%
- SVSTATE VOICESone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -4%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…
Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…
Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…
Justice Action Center JAC pilots an innovative model that advances the rights of immigrant communities by connecting cutting-edge impact litigation and compelling narrative and communications content. The purpose of JAC is to advance the…
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
Columbia legal services advocates for laws that advance social, economic, and racial equity for people living in poverty. our work is to end exclusionary policies that have invested in walls and bars rather than investing in people and…
Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…
Liberation in a generation (libgen) is a movement support organization dedicated to advancing the economic liberation of people of color within one generation. formed in 2019, libgen is dedicated to building the power of people of color to…
Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Colorofchange.org works to strengthen the voice of black americans and increase the level of accountability and responsiveness of elected officials to underrepresented black constituencies using the internet as a lobbying and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Repower Fund and the most unlike its peers is Weissberg Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
234 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 234 of the 288 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
- Who funds Workers Center For Racial Just NFP ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Alternate RootsInc ↗
- Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Network on Women in Prison dba Legal Services for Prisoners w Children ↗
- Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
- Who funds Kenwood Oakland Community Organization ↗
- Who funds PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Festival Center Inc ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds LATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER DC ↗
- Who funds Washington Interfaith Network ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG WOMEN'S PROJECT ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM INC ↗
- Who funds JEWS UNITED FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds ORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOOD EQUITY ↗
- Who funds United for Respect Education Fund ↗
- Who funds The Black Organizing Project Inc ↗
- Who funds One Voice ↗
- Who funds HOUSING JUSTICE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds BEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds MOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE BLACK SWAN ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds Youth Council for Positive Development ↗
- Who funds Solidaire Network Inc ↗
- Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Florida Immigrant Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds Los Angeles Black Worker Center ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · New Venture Fund · Borealis Philanthropy · Marguerite Casey Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · The Ford Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation · Proteus Fund Inc · Tides Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Impactassetsinc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hill-Snowdon Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Seeds 4 Success Inc — 48% of income from government
- Central Baltimore Partnership Inc — 46% of income from government
- Historic Annapolis Inc — 45% of income from government
- Willamette Valley Law Project Dba Pcun Foundation — 18% of income from government
- Thread Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Wesleyan University — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hill-Snowdon Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hill-Snowdon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.