Skip to content
Hill-Snowdon Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hill-Snowdon Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
174
Grants FY2024still arriving
24
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Civil Rights$5.4MPhilanthropy$2.4MEducation$1.2MCommunity Improvement$1.2MYouth Development$992kEmployment$990kPublic Benefit$922kCrime & Legal$823kOther$0
02FY2024 · 174 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k91 grants · $353k
  • $10k–50k79 grants · $2.6M
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $250k
$7,500
Median grant
24
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION$75,000
ALTERNATE ROOTS INC$75,000
NEW VENTURE FUND$50,000
THE EMBODIMENT INSTITUTE INCORPORATED$50,000
ONE VOICE INC$45,000
INTERRELIGIOUS FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION$45,000
FESTIVAL CENTER INC$45,000
LEGAL SERVICES FOR PRISONERS WITH CHILDREN$45,000
DC JOBS WITH JUSTICE$45,000
WORKERS CENTER FOR RACIAL JUSTICE$45,000
BLACK ORGANIZING PROJECT$45,000
MOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT$45,000
EMPOWER DC$45,000
HAWAII WORKERS CENTER$45,000
ORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOOD EQUITY$45,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%re power Fund: $40k → 11%BLACK ORGANIZING PROJECT: $45k → 10%Open Buffalo Inc: $10k → 13%Mekong NYC: $10k → 28%FREEDOM INC: $40k → 10%Voces de la Frontera: $50k → 17%repower Fund: $25k → 11%Black Organizing Project Membership Center: $35k → 10%Tides Center: $40k → 10%Freedom Inc: $40k → 10%Voces de la Frontera: $50k → 17%Black Organizing Project Membership Center: $35k → 10%Tides Center: $35k → 10%Freedom Inc: $40k → 10%Voces de la Frontera: $8k → 17%Freedom Inc: $35k → 10%Voces de la Frontera: $8k → 17%Tides Center: $35k → 10%Freedom Inc: $30k → 10%Freedom Inc: $8k → 10%Your New Beginnings Inc: $10k → 11%Freedom Inc: $8k → 10%Your New Beginnings Inc: $8k → 11%FREEDOM INC: $8k → 10%Public Allies: $40k → 17%Public Allies: $8k → 17%Southern Partners Fund: $20k → 13%Colorado People's Alliance: $10k → 12%Coleman Advocates for Children and Youth: $40k → 10%Coleman Advocates for Children and Youth: $40k → 10%COLEMAN ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH: $40k → 10%Coleman Advocates for Children and Youth: $10k → 10%Choose Love Inc: $10k → 17%AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER: $45k → 17%African Communities Together: $40k → 17%African Communities Together: $40k → 17%African Communities Together: $35k → 17%African Communities Together: $35k → 17%African Communities Together: $15k → 17%AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER: $8k → 17%African Communities Together: $8k → 17%FESTIVAL CENTER INC: $45k → 14%FESTIVAL CENTER INC: $40k → 14%The Festival Center: $40k → 14%The Festival Center: $35k → 14%The Festival Center: $18k → 14%FESTIVAL CENTER INC: $17k → 14%FESTIVAL CENTER INC: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
SD
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 122 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

122 repeat relationships: 76 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

122
122

Total granted

$13M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+3%

Still filing today

84%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $376k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $358k · revenue +11%
  • NEO Philanthropy Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $349k · revenue +27%
  • WC
    Workers Center For Racial Just NFP
    5× · 2020–2024 · $338k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • GF
    Groundswell Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -25%
  • TC
    Tides Center
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
3
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
4
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
5
Justice Action Center

Justice Action Center JAC pilots an innovative model that advances the rights of immigrant communities by connecting cutting-edge impact litigation and compelling narrative and communications content. The purpose of JAC is to advance the…

Civil Rights
6
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
7
Columbia Legal Services

Columbia legal services advocates for laws that advance social, economic, and racial equity for people living in poverty. our work is to end exclusionary policies that have invested in walls and bars rather than investing in people and…

Crime & Legal
8
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
9
Liberation in a Generation

Liberation in a generation (libgen) is a movement support organization dedicated to advancing the economic liberation of people of color within one generation. formed in 2019, libgen is dedicated to building the power of people of color to…

Civil Rights
10
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
11
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
12
Colorofchangeorg

Colorofchange.org works to strengthen the voice of black americans and increase the level of accountability and responsiveness of elected officials to underrepresented black constituencies using the internet as a lobbying and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Repower Fund; the most unlike its peers is Weissberg Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

234 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 234 of the 288 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
43
Early backer (in before they grew)
230/234
Grantees still filing
122/234
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Network on Women in Prison dba Legal Services for Prisoners w Children: $262,500 · OtherNEO Philanthropy Inc: $349,450 · OtherAlternate RootsInc: $300,000 · OtherBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $261,920 · Other+99 more: $6,105,147 · Other+99 moreBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC: $357,650 · Civil RightsBVM CAPACITY …Workers Center For Racial Just NFP: $337,500 · Civil RightsWorkers Cente…Florida Immigrant Coalition Inc: $155,120 · Civil RightsFlorida Immig…Transgender Law Center: $155,000 · Civil RightsTransgender L…PROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC: $154,740 · Civil RightsPROGEORGIA ST…SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC: $145,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHERNERS O…Step Up Louisiana Organizing Fund: $142,500 · Civil RightsStep Up Louis…MANY LANGUAGES ONE VOICE: $139,000 · Civil RightsMANY LANGUAGE…CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $132,500 · Civil RightsCHILDREN'S DE…+13 more: $265,000 · Civil Rights+13 moreFestival Center Inc: $234,167 · Human ServicesFestival Ce…AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC: $234,060 · Human ServicesAFRICAN COM…FREEDOM INC: $212,500 · Human ServicesFREEDOM INCThe Black Organizing Project Inc: $207,500 · Human ServicesThe Black O…SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC: $145,000 · Human ServicesSEVENTH GEN…Coleman Children and Youth Services dba Coleman Advocates for Children & Youth: $141,000 · Human ServicesColeman Chi…VOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC: $126,300 · Human ServicesVOCES DE LA…TIDES CENTER: $118,100 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTE…REPOWER FUND: $65,000 · Human Services+14 more: $206,665 · Human Services+14 morePROGRESSIVE MARYLAND EDUCATION FUND INC: $237,500 · EducationPROGRESSIVE…THE YOUNG WOMEN'S PROJECT: $213,554 · EducationTHE YOUNG W…United for Respect Education Fund: $209,500 · EducationUnited for …THE SCHOTT FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION: $150,000 · EducationTHE SCHOTT …HAWAII WORKERS CENTER: $150,000 · EducationHAWAII WORK…Scalawag: $145,000 · EducationScalawagEducation Justice Alliance: $132,500 · EducationEducation J…We the People MI: $116,370 · EducationWe the Peop…EMBODIMENT INSTITUTE INCORPORATED: $115,000 · EducationEMBODIMENT …BLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA: $99,740 · EducationBLUEPRINT N…+7 more: $94,000 · Education+7 moreTIDES FOUNDATION: $326,940 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOU…Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $289,600 · PhilanthropyAmalgamat…BEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE: $200,000 · PhilanthropyBEND THE …Solidaire Network Inc: $163,192 · PhilanthropySolidaire…GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $157,800 · PhilanthropyGREATER W…Social Impact Fund: $145,000 · PhilanthropySocial Im…Groundswell Fund: $50,000 · Philanthropy+9 more: $98,604 · Philanthropy+9 moreCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $425,000 · Community ImprovementKenwood Oakland Community Organization: $250,000 · Community ImprovementLATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $219,982 · Community ImprovementEMPOWER DC: $217,500 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $54,500 · Community Improvement+7 more: $66,000 · Community ImprovementHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $540,000 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $260,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUND: $200,000 · Environment+4 more: $40,000 · Environment
Other$7,279,017Civil Rights$1,984,010Human Services$1,690,292Education$1,663,164Philanthropy$1,431,136Community Improvement$1,232,982Environment$1,040,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $540,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $425,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC: $357,650 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $349,450 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWorkers Center For Racial Just NFP: $337,500 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $326,940 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAlternate RootsInc: $300,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $289,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNetwork on Women in Prison dba Legal Services for Prisoners w Children: $262,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $261,920 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $260,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKenwood Oakland Community Organization: $250,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetPROGRESSIVE MARYLAND EDUCATION FUND INC: $237,500 over 5y, 9.4% of budgetFestival Center Inc: $234,167 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetAFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC: $234,060 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetSOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE: $227,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetLATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $219,982 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetEMPOWER DC: $217,500 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetWashington Interfaith Network: $217,500 over 5y, 15% of budgetTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S PROJECT: $213,554 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetFREEDOM INC: $212,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetJEWS UNITED FOR JUSTICE INC: $211,560 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOOD EQUITY: $210,000 over 5y, 9.2% of budgetUnited for Respect Education Fund: $209,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetThe Black Organizing Project Inc: $207,500 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetOne Voice: $205,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetHOUSING JUSTICE LEAGUE INC: $200,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE: $200,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetMOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT: $187,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE BLACK SWAN ACADEMY INC: $185,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetYouth Council for Positive Development: $172,000 over 3y, 37% of budgetSolidaire Network Inc: $163,192 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $157,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFlorida Immigrant Coalition Inc: $155,120 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetTransgender Law Center: $155,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLos Angeles Black Worker Center: $155,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetPROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC: $154,740 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPADRES UNIDOS INC: $153,880 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetINTERRELIGIOUS FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $151,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetTHE SCHOTT FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION: $150,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetHAWAII WORKERS CENTER: $150,000 over 4y, 43% of budgetSocial Impact Fund: $145,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetScalawag: $145,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC: $145,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC: $145,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $142,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetStep Up Louisiana Organizing Fund: $142,500 over 3y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
  • Who funds Workers Center For Racial Just NFP ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Alternate RootsInc ↗
  • Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Network on Women in Prison dba Legal Services for Prisoners w Children ↗
  • Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds Kenwood Oakland Community Organization ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Festival Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds LATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWER DC ↗
  • Who funds Washington Interfaith Network ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG WOMEN'S PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWS UNITED FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOOD EQUITY ↗
  • Who funds United for Respect Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds The Black Organizing Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds One Voice ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING JUSTICE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds BEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds MOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE BLACK SWAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Youth Council for Positive Development ↗
  • Who funds Solidaire Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Florida Immigrant Coalition Inc ↗
  • Who funds Transgender Law Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…NEO Philanthropy IncNew Venture FundBorealis PhilanthropyMarguerite Casey Foun…Wellspring Philanthro…The Ford FoundationCommon Counsel Founda…Proteus Fund IncTides FoundationFoundation to Promote…Impactassetsinc
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC92× affinity79 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · New Venture Fund · Borealis Philanthropy · Marguerite Casey Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · The Ford Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation · Proteus Fund Inc · Tides Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Impactassetsinc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hill-Snowdon Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hill-Snowdon Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Seeds 4 Success Inc: 48% of income from government
  • Central Baltimore Partnership Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Historic Annapolis Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Willamette Valley Law Project Dba Pcun Foundation: 18% of income from government
  • Thread Inc: 12% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Casa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Fusion Partnership Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
55report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hill-Snowdon Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hill-Snowdon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 288 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hill-Snowdon’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home