· Public charity
Vera Institute of Justice Inc
Vera is a national organization that partners with impacted communities and government leaders to transform the criminal, legal, and immigration systems.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 28 grants below total $2,142,324 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,422,399 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $280,075 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $264k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.0M
- $250k+2 grants · $811k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ACTIVATING CHANGE INC | $560,598 |
| NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS | $250,000 |
| THE NEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC | $200,000 |
| PROJECT GUARDIANSHIP INC | $138,208 |
| THE LEGAL CLINIC | $100,000 |
| LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER | $100,000 |
| ONWARD LEGACY FOUNDATION | $68,400 |
| NICHOLS CENTER INC | $64,800 |
| THE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY MEDIATION AND FACILITATION INC | $64,800 |
| RESTORATIVE ARLINGTON | $64,800 |
| OAR OF FAIRFAX INC | $64,800 |
| COMMUNITIES FOR RESTORATIVE JUSTICE INC | $64,800 |
| ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA | $64,800 |
| NATIONAL CENTER FOR YOUTH LAW | $50,000 |
| TAKEACTION MINNESOTA EDUCATION FUND | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $19.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
112 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 100 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $740k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACACACIA CENTER FOR JUSTICE3× · 2022–2024 · $8.9M · revenue ×16
- ACACTIVATING CHANGE INC4× · 2022–2025 · $4.8M · revenue +53% · 81% of their budget
- IJIMMIGRANT JUSTICE CORPS INC3× · 2022–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +28%
Funded once
- FIFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INCone grant, 2022 · $1.7M · revenue -37%
- ABAmerican Bar Association Fund for Justice and Educationone grant, 2022 · $1.5M · revenue -1%
- HAHeartland Alliance for Human Needs and Rightsone grant, 2022 · $1.3M · revenue -75%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC) is a leader in advancing immigrant rights through its unique strategy drawing on its legal services to promote legal reform through litigation, advocacy and strategic communications.
The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…
As one of the most enduring civil rights institutions on the West Coast, we work to dismantle systems of oppression and racism, and build an equitable and just society.
Justice Action Center JAC pilots an innovative model that advances the rights of immigrant communities by connecting cutting-edge impact litigation and compelling narrative and communications content. The purpose of JAC is to advance the…
Detention Watch Network seeks to end the cruel system of immigration detention via programs of grassroots organizing, strategic communications, and collective advocacy.
Work with DC courts, private bar & legal services providers to increase legal representations for low & moderate income DC residents, enhance efficiency of legal services, and reduce barriers to the judicial system.
Ccij utilizes coordination, advocacy, and legal services to fight for the liberationof immigrants in detention in california. we seek to empower immigrants in detentionand their communities through technical assistance, education, and…
Arkansas justice collective is a nonprofit law firm serving survivors of trafficking and child abuse across arkansas and the region.
The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
In 2024, Inner City Law Center, ICLC, served over 3,400 people, helping vulnerable Angelenos to remain in their homes and recover nearly $20.5 million in financial benefits.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Immigrant Rights Project and the most unlike its peers is River Valley Organizing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 21% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
233 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 233 of the 264 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ACACIA CENTER FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds ACTIVATING CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds MILPA ↗
- Who funds KIND INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds American Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds Heartland Alliance for Human Needs and Rights ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC COUNSEL ↗
- Who funds PRISONERS' LEGAL SERVICES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds Immigrant Defenders Law Center ↗
- Who funds Erie County Bar Association ↗
- Who funds Galveston-Houston Immigrant Representation Project ↗
- Who funds MID-SOUTH IMMIGRATION ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT GUARDIANSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS ↗
- Who funds Central American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRATION CENTER FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY JUSTICE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds CAMINAR LATINO INC ↗
- Who funds Michigan Advocacy Program ↗
- Who funds DIOCESAN MIGRANT & REFUGEE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds END DOMESTIC ABUSE WISCONSIN THE WI COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME INC ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area ↗
- Who funds NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA IMMIGRATION RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE INC F/K/A FLA IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds FORGE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO COOK WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Equal Justice Works · Borealis Philanthropy · Immigrant Justice Corps Inc · Fwdus Education Fund Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Public Welfare Foundation Inc · Immigrant Legal Resource Center · Tides Center · Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · New Venture Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Vera Institute of Justice Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- International Association for Indigenous Aging — 100% of income from government
- Triangle Inc — 90% of income from government
- Victim Rights Law Center Inc — 89% of income from government
- Boston Area Rape Crisis Center Inc — 82% of income from government
- Legal Services of New Jersey Inc — 53% of income from government
- Florida Legal Services Inc — 39% of income from government
- Connecticut Institute for Refugees and Immigrants Inc — 37% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- National Florence Crittenton Mission — 24% of income from government
- Immigration Counseling Service Inc — 20% of income from government
- Community Catalyst Inc — 15% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- National Center for Victims of Crime Inc — 10% of income from government
- Communities for Restorative Justice Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.