Skip to content
Futures Without Violence at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Futures Without Violence

To pioneer new strategies to end violence against women and children at home and abroad.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$7.5MEducation$2.5MScience & Tech$1.5MCrime & Legal$1.4MPublic Benefit$987kEmployment$887kInternational$710kHealth$707kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $318k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $251k
  • $250k+2 grants · $998k
$22,953
Median grant
14
States reached
$99M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ORGANIZACION EN CALIFORNIA DE LIDERES CAMPESINAS$600,000
WESTED$398,076
ALIANZ NACIONAL DE CAMPESINAS$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$51,214
OMNI FAMILY HEALTH$50,000
CALEXICO WELLNESS CENTER$50,000
NEW ENGLAND ARAB AMERICAN ORGANIZATION$36,108
YOU ARE MORE THAN INC$32,909
WOMEN ORGANIZED TO MAKE ABUSE NON EXISTENT INC (WOMAN)$32,132
SAFE FUTURES INC$25,596
SOUTH ASIAN NETWORK INC$23,488
SERVICES & ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL & TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC$23,045
KAN-WIN$22,953
SHENANDOAH WOMEN'S CENTER DBA EASTERN PANHANDLE EMPLOYMENT CENTER$17,857
JUSTICE INNOVATION INC$17,276
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ASIAN WOMEN UNITED OF MINNESOTA: $10k → 11%THE LATINA CENTER: $30k → 9%LA LUZ CENTER: $600k → 9%LIFESPAN OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $10k → 14%IOWA COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $75k → 10%CIA SIAB INC: $86k → 12%SAFE FUTURES INC: $26k → 9%CADRE: $9k → 13%LATINA SAFEHOUSE INITIATIVE: $31k → 12%OHIO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE NETWORK: $57k → 15%MI CENTRO: $194k → 9%YOU ARE MORE THAN INC: $33k → 7%TURNAROUND INC: $31k → 11%LA LUZ CENTER: $10k → 9%ALIANZA NACIONAL DE CAMPESINAS: $214k → 10%JENESSE CENTER INC: $8k → 14%SAFE HORIZON INC: $5k → 17%OHIO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE NETWORK: $18k → 15%HEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES: $31k → 14%YOU ARE MORE THAN INC: $12k → 7%CASA DE ESPERANZA: $41k → 14%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $31k → 8%ALIANZA NACIONAL DE CAMPESINAS: $150k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $600k → 10%COLORADO COALTION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $75k → 12%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $62k → 10%CASA DE ESPERANZA: $34k → 14%ALIANZA NACIONAL DE CAMPESINAS INC: $15k → 10%KAN-WIN: $31k → 14%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $51k → 10%KAN-WIN: $23k → 14%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $49k → 10%SOUTH ASIAN NETWORK INC: $23k → 14%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $19k → 10%CENTER FOR YOUNG WOMEN'S DEVELOPMENT: $600k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $10k → 10%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $31k → 11%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
WV
VA
MD
KS
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 49 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
58

Total granted

$15M
$2.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+25%

Still filing today

78%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $251k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalEducationEmploymentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Kansas Center for Research Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $1.5M · revenue +44%
  • Organizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +106%
  • CL
    CAMINAR LATINO INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $914k · revenue +402%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE PRIMARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $600k · revenue +14%
  • NF
    NATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue -88%
  • MC
    MI CENTRO
    one grant, 2023 · $194k · revenue -25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

Health
2
Family Violence Law Center

FVLC helps diverse communities in Alameda County heal from domestic violence and sexual assault, advocating for justice and healthy relationships. We provide survivor-centered legal and crisis intervention services, offer prevention for…

Crime & Legal
3
The Network Advocating Against Domestic Violence

The Network is a group of 40+ member organizations dedicated to improving the lives of those impacted by gender-based violence through education, public policy and advocacy, and connecting community members with direct service providers.…

Human Services
4
California Partnership to End Domestic Violence

The organization's mission is to promote the collective voice of a diverse coalition of organizations and individuals working to eliminate all forms of domestic violence. as an advocate for sociate change, we advance our mission by…

Civil Rights
5
Michigan Coalition to End Domestic and Sexual Violence

Dedicated to the empowerment of all the state's survivors of domestic and sexual violence. our mission is to develop and promote efforts aimed at the elimination of all domestic and sexual violence in michigan.

—
6
Latinos in Virginia Empowerment Center

Provide education, advocacy, and support to spanish speaking individuals affected by violence and injustice in virginia to ensure that they can access services to empower them to become happy, healthy, and self- sufficient.

Crime & Legal
7
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
8
Center for Survivor Agency Andjustice

CSAJ is a national organization dedicated to enhancing advocacy for survivors of intimate partner violence. We develop and promote advocacy approaches that remove systemic barriers enhance organizational responses and improve professional…

Crime & Legal
9
Alliance Against Domestic Abuse

To eliminate domestic violence and sexual assault and to empower victims through education, service, and social change.

Crime & Legal
10
Ujima the National Center On Violence Against Women

To mobilize the community to respond to and end domestic, sexual and community violence in the black community. we actualize this mission through research, public awareness and community engagement, and resource development. ujima serves…

Crime & Legal
11
Su Casa - Ending Domestic Violence

Su casa's mission is to empower individuals and families to live free from domestic abuse and build partnerships with communities to end domestic violence. the organization helps transform victims into survivors, helping them escape the…

—
12
The Center for Violence-Free Relationships

The Center for Violence-Free Relationships is dedicated to building healthy relationships, families, and communities free from sexual assault and domestic violence through education, advocacy, and services in western El Dorado County.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Women's Freedom Center; the most unlike its peers is Calexico Wellness Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
101/105
Grantees still filing
64/105
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTED: $1,744,204 · OtherWESTEDSAFE & SOUND: $610,000 · OtherSAFE & SOUNDMONTEREY COUNTY CHILDREN & FAMILIES COMMISSION: $610,000 · OtherMONTEREY COUNTY CHILDREN & FAMILIES COMMISSIONMISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $610,000 · OtherMISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCYALLEGHENY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES: $588,133 · OtherALLEGHENY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICESILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $322,415 · OtherBREAK THE CYCLE: $282,089 · OtherCARRY THE VISION: $609,996 · OtherCARRY THE VISION+58 more: $2,246,154 · Other+58 moreCAMINAR LATINO INC: $914,294 · Human ServicesCAMINAR LATINO INCLA LUZ CENTER: $610,000 · Human ServicesLA LUZ CENTERCHILDREN NOW: $610,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN NOWYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $610,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTERAlianza Nacional de Campesinas Inc: $478,575 · Human ServicesAlianza Nacional de Campesin…MI CENTRO: $194,365 · Human ServicesJEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $181,904 · Human Services+24 more: $1,029,250 · Human Services+24 moreUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc: $1,482,576 · Science & TechUniversit…Organizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc: $1,237,608 · EmploymentOrganizac…NATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS: $200,000 · EmploymentNATIONAL …+1 more: $31,308 · EmploymentTHE PRIMARY SCHOOL: $600,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $418,133 · EducationFORGE INC: $104,947 · Education+6 more: $108,378 · EducationCENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIAL POLICY: $986,779 · Public BenefitNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES: $732,932 · Crime & LegalGUAM COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT AND FAMILY VIOLENCE CORP: $43,917 · Crime & LegalIn The Streets Inc: $41,791 · Crime & LegalEssie Justice Group: $41,057 · Crime & Legal+5 more: $96,226 · Crime & Legal
Other$7,622,991Human Services$4,628,388Science & Tech$1,482,576Employment$1,468,916Education$1,231,458Public Benefit$986,779Crime & Legal$955,923

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc: $1,482,576 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetOrganizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc: $1,237,608 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetCENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIAL POLICY: $986,779 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetCAMINAR LATINO INC: $914,294 over 6y, 22% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES: $732,932 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetSAFE & SOUND: $610,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetLA LUZ CENTER: $610,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetCHILDREN NOW: $610,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $610,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetMISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $610,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetCARRY THE VISION: $609,996 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAlianza Nacional de Campesinas Inc: $478,575 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $418,133 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBREAK THE CYCLE: $282,089 over 3y, 15% of budgetNATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS: $200,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMI CENTRO: $194,365 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetJEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $181,904 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetMICHIGAN ORGANIZATION ON ADOLESCENT SEXUAL HEALTH: $129,661 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetOMNI FAMILY HEALTH: $120,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Health Center Assoc of Connecticut Inc: $106,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFORGE INC: $104,947 over 3y, 10% of budgetNEW ENGLAND ARAB AMERICAN ORGANIZATION: $91,852 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetCIA SIAB INC: $85,949 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS EDUCATION FUND: $80,521 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOLORADO COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $75,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetIDAHO COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $75,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetOHIO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE NETWORK: $75,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetESPERANZA UNITED: $74,865 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC: $70,113 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPublic Health Institute: $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetViolence Free Minnesota: $64,469 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCLINICA SIERRA VISTA: $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHENANDOAH WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $57,644 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetKING URBAN LIFE CENTER INC: $54,675 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetKAN-WIN: $53,864 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON WOMEN: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYWCA NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $49,748 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetYOU ARE MORE THAN INC: $44,671 over 2y, 11% of budgetEAST LOS ANGELES WOMEN'S CENTER: $43,598 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetIn The Streets Inc: $41,791 over 1y, 11% of budgetEssie Justice Group: $41,057 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INC: $40,872 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetASIAN HEALTH SERVICES: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCalifornia School-Based Health Alliance: $40,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetWOMAN Inc: $32,132 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetHEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES INC: $31,333 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH IMPERATIVES INC: $31,321 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN EMPLOYED: $31,308 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Allstate Foundati…California Physicians…Novo FoundationThe California Endowm…Women's Foundation of…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Annie E Casey Foundat…Tides FoundationThe California Wellne…Rockefeller Philanthr…Vera Institute of Jus…Weingart Foundation
The Allstate FoundationIL32.5× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Allstate Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Novo Foundation · The California Endowment · Women's Foundation of California · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Vera Institute of Justice Inc · Weingart Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Futures Without Violence funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Futures Without Violence. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 40%
  • Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc: 100% of income from government
  • You Are More Than Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Community Health Center Assoc of Connecticut Inc: 85% of income from government
  • Health Imperatives Inc: 79% of income from government
  • Jeanne Geiger Crisis Center Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Turnaround Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Ywca Northeastern Massachusetts Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 120 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Futures Without Violence’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home