· Public charity
doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation
The Corporation is organized exclusively for charitable, religious, educational, and scientific purposes, and the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1968.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 51 grants below total $2,043,232 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,167,744 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,124,512 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k40 grants · $796k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $574k
- $250k+2 grants · $637k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHOICE Humanitarian | $386,271 |
| Sanaag Healthcare Foundation | $251,024 |
| Dahlia's Hope Non Profit Inc | $200,897 |
| Rising Star Outreach | $200,335 |
| NYAGI Project | $100,000 |
| Inheritance International Ministries | $72,794 |
| Rockland Farm Alliance Inc | $42,168 |
| Chair the Hope | $40,000 |
| Idaho Period Project Inc | $22,889 |
| The Phoenix Journey | $22,090 |
| Caribbean Health Assistance | $20,870 |
| Sender Retreat Foundation Inc | $20,250 |
| Davids Kidz International Inc | $20,075 |
| Shropshire Music Foundation | $20,056 |
| South Asia Access | $20,050 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $1.2M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Supporting Children · Global Health · Empowering Women
Stated purpose: Supporting Children · Disaster Relief · Self-Reliance
Stated purpose: Supporting Children · Empowering Women · Clean Water & Sanitation
Stated purpose: Global Health
Stated purpose: Self-Reliance · Supporting Children · Empowering Women
Stated purpose: Supporting Children · Disaster Relief
Stated purpose: Empowering Women
Stated purpose: Empowering Women
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 11% of doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 46% of the giving stays in UT; read by stated purpose it is 40% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
93 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 77 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $769k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RHRAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC4× · 2017–2020 · $3.1M · revenue +41%
- DFDays For Girls International7× · 2017–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +137%
- OROUR RESCUE4× · 2017–2020 · $1.9M · revenue +180%
Funded once
- JCJUAB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2018 · $1.4M
DUKE UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $1.2M · revenue +41%- FOFRIENDS OF THE COALITION FKA FOOD & CARE COALITION OF UTAH VALLEY3× · 2020–2022 · $1.1M · revenue -47%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support of Orphaned, Displaced or Abandoned children.
Hands of Hope African Outreach empowers vulnerable women and children in East Africa by partnering with small community-based organizations We support locally led initiatives that provide vocational training access to education healthcare…
We offer assistance to girls who were exploited poverty stricken victims and refugees from Cuba and Haiti
JOY International is dedicated to the prevention of child trafficking and to the freedom, healing, and empowerment of trafficked children, teens, and young adults worldwide.
Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.
Generations Humanitarian is committed to transforming street children toward an abundance of health, hope and loving homes thereby breaking the cycle of scarcity for generations to come.
assisting orphans and missionary in need
Eden Garden Orphanage cares for orphans in and from the country of Haiti, preventing the otherwise likely outcome of an early death due to malnutrition or disease and /or a life of prostitution or crime.
Journey To Destiny Ministries (JTDM) is a global, faith-based nonprofit organization committed to transforming and restoring dignity, hope, and opportunity to vulnerable individualsespecially children, women, and families affected by…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope for Haiti Inc and the most unlike its peers is Phoenix Journey. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 19% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
334 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 334 of the 420 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Sanaag Healthcare Foundation ↗
- Who funds RAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Days For Girls International ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HUMANITARIAN OUTREACH AND INTERCULTURAL EXCHANGE ↗
- Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
- Who funds Mentors International ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE COALITION FKA FOOD & CARE COALITION OF UTAH VALLEY ↗
- Who funds 3STRANDS GLOBAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Dahlias Hope Non Profit Inc ↗
- Who funds Peace House Inc ↗
- Who funds doTERRA Hope Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BRENT & CHERI ANDRUS CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds Rising Star Outreach Inc ↗
- Who funds CUMORAH ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Americas Kids Belong ↗
- Who funds Coaxion Global Inc ↗
- Who funds Elizabeth Smart Foundation ↗
- Who funds ENGAGE NOW AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds A CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HIKI OLA ↗
- Who funds LETS Inc ↗
- Who funds Fredette Family Foundation ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MAMA BABY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds OCOTILLO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR HAITI INC ↗
- Who funds MUNDO EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds RENAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PROTECT INNOCENCE FOUNDATION LLC ↗
- Who funds Nyagi Project ↗
- Who funds HARVESTERS INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds TRUE Africa ↗
- Who funds Families Mentoring Families ↗
- Who funds Hungry Hearts International ↗
- Who funds THE MIRACLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Africompassion USA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · University Impact · The Ashton Family Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Clark and Christine Ivory Foundation · Our Rescue · Beesley Family Foundation · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Making a Difference Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Easter Seals Southwest Florida Inc — 12% of income from government
- All Ages Music Portland dba Friends of Noise — 1% of income from government
- Hope for Haiti Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation?
Find your warmest path to doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.