Skip to content

Utah · Nonprofit

100 Humanitarians International

100 Humanitarians International (Utah) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $247,478 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($163,137). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 84% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$419k
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$247k
Net assets
$52k
4/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 15%
01What it does

What 100 Humanitarians International does

Mission

Mentoring Families in self-reliance through education, mentoring, economic development for family progression.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Mentoring families in self-reliance. At the core of what we do is to support the family. We believe that the best way to support a student as they are going through their education, is to mentor their family in self-reliance and economic development, so that they all progress together. We have worked with over 100 families in Kenya with our Business Box for Families program and we have taught stewardship and business skills to families in 8 different countries.

    $236,681 spent$137,000 earned by the program
    61% of program spending
  2. Training Center for Economic Development. We have built two training centers in our communities in Kenya, where we have setup sewing and literacy projects for families. Our next project includes classrooms and a computer lab at the Emparnat Cultural Center on the Maasai Mara.

    $108,248 spent$281,710 earned by the program
    28% of program spending
  3. Womens Initiatives. Our womens initiatives have helped drive many of our objectives over the past 6 years. Whether we are fundraising for Days for Girls Kits, assembling Rescue Kits, hosting Sew-a-thons, or mentoring and training in Kenya, our goal is always to help women develop their skills to help their families.

    $44,669 spent
    11% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $389,598.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($194k) Expenses 100 ($184k) Net assets 100 ($27k)2019 Revenue 154 ($299k) Expenses 140 ($257k) Net assets 258 ($69k)2020 Revenue 137 ($266k) Expenses 172 ($316k) Net assets 71 ($19k)2021 Revenue 169 ($329k) Expenses 146 ($268k) Net assets 298 ($79k)2022 Revenue 294 ($571k) Expenses 293 ($539k) Net assets 451 ($120k)2023 Revenue 227 ($442k) Expenses 256 ($471k) Net assets 341 ($91k)2024 Revenue 216 ($419k) Expenses 249 ($458k) Net assets 194 ($52k)
2018201920202021202220232024
Revenue (216)Expenses (249)Net assets (194)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $19k to $79k (+321%).

$27k
$69k
$19k
$79k
$120k
$91k
$52k
2018201920202021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of 100 Humanitarians International’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (87% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,828 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$10k
’18
$42k
’19
−$50k
’20
$61k
’21
$32k
’22
−$30k
’23
−$39k
’24
1.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Heidi Totten

Executive director

Board chair

Allen Roberds

Chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

201920202021202220232024
Listed22241010
Joined····+8+0
No longer listed····20
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $14k → $40k.

4 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 84% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of 100 Humanitarians International’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

100 Humanitarians International leans on a few funders — its largest provides 66% of grant income and the top three 86%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

90% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund 100 Humanitarians International.

66%
largest funder
86%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 99% · 2021 87% · 2022 97% · 2023 39% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

84% of 100 Humanitarians International's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $39k that is directly attributable, 61% of it comes from funders outside Utah, across 2 states.

CA
UT

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’21
’23
Utah out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $209k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

100 Humanitarians International has grown faster than half of the 7,117 philanthropy nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−9% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve1.4mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)14% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,117 philanthropy nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like 100 Humanitarians International

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

85% of spending goes to programs.

Program 85%Management 14%Fundraising 1%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for 100 Humanitarians International: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds 100 Humanitarians International?
100 Humanitarians International (Utah) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $247,478 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($163,137). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 84% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does 100 Humanitarians International have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $247,478 in grants to 100 Humanitarians International, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of 100 Humanitarians International?
NETWORK FOR GOOD is the largest funder on record, with $163,137 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like 100 Humanitarians International find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds 100 Humanitarians International →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing