Skip to content

Maine · Nonprofit

RIPPLE EFFECT PROJECT

RIPPLE EFFECT PROJECT (Maine) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $100,630 to it, the largest being doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation ($41,585). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 54% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$76k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$101k
Net assets
$6k
3/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 33%
01What it does

What Ripple Effect Project does

Mission

Ripple Effect Project is dedicated to supporting the self sustainable agricultural and educational endeavors of independent orphanages in sub- saharan africa.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. Ripple Effect Project sent emergency funds to support the feeding of children at the dolfine korando children's learning centre. Many students did not have a food source due to the ramifications of their unstable social, political and economic environment . Dolfine korando children's learning centre delivers food to orphans and students.

  2. 2.education - Ripple Effect Project provided funds for the education budget at the dofine korando children's learning centre. This budget includes staffing teachers, counselors, administration, food workers, and security. It also includes school supply money.

    $64,180 spent
    88% of program spending
  3. Infrastructure - funds were also sent for new dormitory structures and renovations that were required by the ministry of education. This was required in order to allow students to come back to school after the holiday break.

    $2,620 spent
    4% of program spending
  4. Others including medical expenses for children.

    $6,335 spent
    9% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $73,135.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($92k) Expenses 100 ($49k) Net assets 100 ($81k)2018 Revenue 99 ($91k) Expenses 181 ($88k) Net assets 105 ($85k)2019 Revenue 134 ($123k) Expenses 320 ($156k) Net assets 65 ($53k)2020 Revenue 86 ($79k) Expenses 164 ($79k) Net assets 64 ($52k)2021 Revenue 111 ($102k) Expenses 221 ($107k) Net assets 57 ($46k)2022 Revenue 127 ($117k) Expenses 276 ($134k) Net assets 35 ($29k)2023 Revenue 107 ($98k) Expenses 225 ($110k) Net assets 21 ($17k)2024 Revenue 83 ($76k) Expenses 178 ($87k) Net assets 7 ($6k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (83)Expenses (178)Net assets (7)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $85k to $53k (−38%).

$81k
$85k
$53k
$52k
$46k
$29k
$17k
$6k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assets

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of RIPPLE EFFECT PROJECT’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,031 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$43k
’17
$3k
’18
−$32k
’19
−$945
’20
−$6k
’21
−$17k
’22
−$12k
’23
−$11k
’24
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income fell $30k → $21k.

3 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 54% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of RIPPLE EFFECT PROJECT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

RIPPLE EFFECT PROJECT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 41% of grant income and the top three 94%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

95% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund RIPPLE EFFECT PROJECT.

41%
largest funder
94%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 67% · 2019 68% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 99% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

54% of RIPPLE EFFECT PROJECT's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $47k that is directly attributable, 89% of it comes from funders outside Maine, across 2 states.

ME
UT

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’19
Maine out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $54k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

RIPPLE EFFECT PROJECT has grown faster than half of the 2,933 international nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−14% · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−3% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,933 international nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Organizations like RIPPLE EFFECT PROJECT

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Maine

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RIPPLE EFFECT PROJECT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds RIPPLE EFFECT PROJECT?
RIPPLE EFFECT PROJECT (Maine) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $100,630 to it, the largest being doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation ($41,585). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 54% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does RIPPLE EFFECT PROJECT have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $100,630 in grants to RIPPLE EFFECT PROJECT, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of RIPPLE EFFECT PROJECT?
doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $41,585 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like RIPPLE EFFECT PROJECT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Maine. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Ripple Effect Project →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing