· Public charity
Our Rescue
OUR RESCUE works collaboratively with law enforcement agencies worldwide to identify, arrest, and prosecute traffickers.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 178 grants below total $2,886,746 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,150,016 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,263,270 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k76 grants · $557k
- $10k–50k95 grants · $1.5M
- $50k–250k7 grants · $855k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Human Trafficking Training Center | $245,000 |
| Unbound Now | $150,000 |
| City of Arlington - Arlington Police Department | $140,000 |
| County of Riverside California - Riverside County District Attorney | $104,165 |
| Rescue Hill Nazarene Compassionate Ministry Center | $100,000 |
| We Fight Monsters LTD | $65,000 |
| Mississippi State University | $50,486 |
| County of Solano - Solano County Sheriff's Office | $40,291 |
| Montgomery County Texas - Montgomery County Precinct 3 Constable's Office | $33,961 |
| Garvin County - Garvin County Sheriff's Office | $32,902 |
| Washington County - Washington County Sheriff's Office | $25,855 |
| Hope Center Indy INC | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| County of Hawaii - Hawaii Police Department | $24,103 |
| County of Lycoming - Lycoming County District Attorney's Office | $23,209 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $3.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $1.7M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, $1.6M to organizations and $51k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Law Enforcement Supplies & Equipment, Survivor Care Facility Repairs & Maintenance, Supplies & Equipment, Education Support
Stated purpose: Law Enforcement Supplies & Equipment, Logistic, Investigative Software, Training and Capacity Building Support, Survivor Care Supplies & Equipment Support · Survivor Care Personal Supplies & Equipment, Therapy, and Education Support
Stated purpose: Law Enforcement Supplies & Equipment, Logistic, Training and Capacity Building Support Support, Survivor Care Facility Repairs & Maintenance and Supplies & Equipment Support · Survivor Care Medical and Transport Support
Stated purpose: Law Enforcement Supplies & Equipment, Logistic, Investigative Software, Training and Capacity Building Support, Survivor Care Facitlity Repairs & Maintenance and Therapy Support
Stated purpose: Law Enforcement Investigative Software, K9 Support
Stated purpose: Law Enforcement Supplies & Equipment, Logistic, Investigative Software, Training and Capacity Building Support
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
85 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2025, 52 since wound down; 142 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LJLOVE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL2× · 2021–2022 · $220k · revenue +36%
- CHCITY HELP INC OF PHOENIX3× · 2020–2023 · $107k · revenue +65%
WIDE HORIZONS FOR CHILDREN INC3× · 2021–2023 · $84k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- RHRODS HEROES INCone grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue -46% · 78% of their budget
- TMThis Missionone grant, 2021 · $850k · revenue -57% · 99% of their budget
- LALIBERTY AND LIGHT SPEAR FUNDone grant, 2021 · $510k · revenue -53% · 76% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide homes and resources for children who have been recovered from sex trafficking worldwide so they begin their unique journey of healing and be a courageous leader in the global anti-trafficking movement.
Seven Sisters International provides rehabilitative care to girls who have been rescued from trafficking and sexual abuse by offering medical and psychological services, social work, education, life skills training, job preparation, and…
Fight human trafficking
Mukti is a Sanskrit word that means "freedom from oppression and exploitation". Our goal is to see women and children find pathways to freedom. We partner with organizations around Asia that are on the frontlines helping to rescue and…
Fighting Human Trafficing
Protecting children and preserving families in vulnerable communities with an emphasis on the prevention, intervention, and restoration of young victims of commercial sexual exploitation and human trafficking. The organization works in the…
To provide emergency and long-term wrap-around therapeutic care to the minor survivors of sex trafficking and exploitation.
Human Rights Organization
To enlighten the public about sex trafficking in america, educate potential victims and first responders, and empower advocates and survivors.
In the 21st century, far too many people are trapped in the darkness of sex trafficking and homelessness. frontline response is on the frontlines every day rescuing these individuals and preventing the most vulnerable in society, our…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Street Grace Inc and the most unlike its peers is Watertown Police Dept Charity Golf Tournament Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 711 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RODS HEROES INC ↗
- Who funds This Mission ↗
- Who funds HAND IN HAND ↗
- Who funds MADISON ADOPTION ASSOCIATES LTD ↗
- Who funds LIBERTY AND LIGHT SPEAR FUND ↗
- Who funds Open Door Adoption Agency Inc ↗
- Who funds GREAT WALL CHINA ADOPTION INC ↗
- Who funds Empowered to Change International Inc ↗
- Who funds RAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds WASATCH INTERNATIONAL ADOPTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds LOVE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds UNBOUND NOW ↗
- Who funds NEW HORIZONS ADOPTION AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC D/B/A NEW HOPE FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds KYAMPISI CHILDCARE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH CRIME VICTIM LEGAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds CITY HELP INC OF PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds CHILDHELP INC ↗
- Who funds THE KOMITE INC ↗
- Who funds VANGUARD UNIVERSITY OF SO CAL ↗
- Who funds UNCAGED ↗
- Who funds Rescue Hill Nazarene Compassionate Ministry Center ↗
- Who funds ARISE PROJECT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds Washington State Patrol Union Troopers Association ↗
- Who funds WORLD LINKS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds STREETLIGHTUSA ↗
- Who funds WIDE HORIZONS FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds LILY HAVEN ↗
- Who funds HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Kennel Club Companion Animal Recovery Corporation · Center for Technology and Civic Life · National Recreation and Park Association · Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation Inc · Ephesians 320 Foundation Inc · Best Friends Animal Society · Safe House Project Inc · doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation · Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc · Cities for Financial Empowerment Fund Inc · The Recycling Partnership Inc · American Bar Association
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Our Rescue funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.