Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

University Impact

University Impact (ui) was founded to build an ecosystem that can accelerate solving the world's social and environmental problems.

$43M
Granted FY2024still arriving
317
Grants FY2024still arriving
38
States reached
$15M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Religion$51MPhilanthropy$12MEducation$8.5MArts & Culture$4.9MInternational$3.6MHuman Services$2.3MEnvironment$1.9MHealth$1.8MOther$0
02FY2024 · 317 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k44 grants · $303k
  • $10k–50k189 grants · $3.5M
  • $50k–250k68 grants · $5.6M
  • $250k+16 grants · $33M
$20,000
Median grant
38
States reached
$385M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints$15,397,118
Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc$5,857,642
Ola Kapukapuakea$2,475,000
Brigham Young University$1,984,200
American Endowment Foundation$1,313,897
Ok Foundation$1,228,000
Southern Highlands Reserve Inc$700,000
McCandless Collection Inc$650,000
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund$602,932
Become More$534,000
Coafrica$450,000
B H Roberts Foundation$400,000
Acts Fellowship Church$385,000
International Restoration Church$320,000
B Moore Foundation Inc$276,116
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Finding Home Foundation Inc: $10k → 8%Mercy House of Chambersburg: $50k → 9%A Breeze of Hope: $10k → 10%One Heart Worldwide: $45k → 11%Shawn Heroes for Life Inc: $25k → 13%Washington County Elder Care Inc: $15k → 14%Project Hope Foundation Inc: $45k → 18%Home Sweet Home: $10k → 11%Tennessee Resettlement Aid: $31k → 14%Korah Kids: $25k → 10%Helping Hands Ministries Inc: $87k → 13%Mission Pre-Born Inc: $37k → 16%Warrior Canine Connection: $21k → 8%Matthews United Methodist Church: $20k → 11%Navajo Power Home: $81k → 16%One Heart Worldwide: $25k → 11%Project Hope Foundation Inc: $45k → 18%Tennessee Resettlement Aid: $11k → 14%Korah Kids Inc: $25k → 10%New Story Inc: $25k → 13%Helping Hands Ministries: $85k → 13%One Heart Worldwide: $25k → 11%Lake Travis Crisis Ministries: $15k → 10%Project Hope Foundation Inc: $45k → 18%Foundation for Education for Generations: $50k → 6%Realize Impact: $26k → 10%At the Cross Ministries: $20k → 9%Foundation for Education for Generations: $50k → 6%Wounded Warrior Project: $28k → 14%Step by Step Family Support Center: $45k → 9%Rescue Fund: $60k → 10%International Health and Early Learning Programs: $15k → 12%SAFE HARBOR CRISIS CENTER: $577k → 6%A Childs Hope Foundation: $103k → 8%Stand With Ukraine: $15k → 6%A Childs Hope Foundation: $37k → 8%New Freedom Project: $20k → 11%Koins for Kenya: $10k → 6%Belev Echad Inc: $18k → 17%Tammy Lynn Memorial Foundation Inc: $10k → 8%The Young Mens Christian Association of the Triang: $35k → 8%One Heart One Mind: $50k → 8%Tabithas Way: $25k → 8%The Young Mens Christian Association of the Triangle Area: $25k → 8%Rising Star Outreach Inc: $55k → 8%Crewe Endowment Foundation: $118k → 8%Rising Star Outreach Inc: $21k → 8%Provo Community Action Services: $19k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$68M · 145 repeat orgs$15M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

145 repeat relationships — 125 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 179 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

145
141

Total granted

$68M
$6.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+9%

Still filing today

77%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationInternationalArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS RESERVE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +305% · 78% of their budget
  • BR
    BH ROBERTS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +98% · 100% of their budget
  • OF
    OK Foundation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • U5
    UNDER 5000 GRANTS
    one grant, 2021 · $832k
  • SH
    SAFE HARBOR CRISIS CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $577k · revenue -22%
  • WO
    WALK OF CHAMPIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue -100% · 34% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
2
Equality Utah Foundation

To secure equal rights and protections for lgbtq utahns and their families.

Civil Rights
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
Ummah Relief International

Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.

International
7
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
8
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
9
Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds Inc

Philanthropic collaborative focused on improving lives through just & inclusive systems change.

Philanthropy
10
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
11
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
12
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Utah Inc and the most unlike its peers is Legends Are Born Everyday Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity College Foundatio…Youth Sports ProgramsChristian Missionary Organi…Cancer Support ServicesYouth Development ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyIndependent K-12 SchoolsFood Banks and PantriesLgbtq+ Community SupportChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Animal Rescue and ShelterEnvironmental Conservation …Addiction Recovery ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community Food PantriesCommunity Arts CentersPregnancy Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportJewish Community Organizati…Equine Therapy ProgramsYmca Youth DevelopmentCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Christian Youth CampsSenior Support ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Elementary Literacy TutoringImmigrant Worker SupportFaith-Based Social ServicesDance Arts OrganizationsSchool District FoundationsLocal History MuseumsDevelopmental Disabilities …United Way AffiliatesDomestic Violence ServicesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number29%8%<5yr17%11%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr15%26%20–35yr8%17%35–55yr12%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value29%6%<5yr17%6%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr15%19%20–35yr8%7%35–55yr12%55%55yr+

The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%4/476
the rest of the field
15%
1,823/11,927

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

370 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 370 of the 482 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

29
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
42
Early backer (in before they grew)
367/370
Grantees still filing
192/370
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS — $45,556,903 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTSBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY — $2,488,685 · OtherOla Kapukapuakea — $2,475,000 · Other+100 more — $13,541,784 · Other+100 moreRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $6,798,508 · PhilanthropyRenaissance Ch…OK Foundation — $1,335,500 · PhilanthropyOK FoundationAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $1,313,897 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOW…PRETTY IN PINK FOUNDATION INC — $785,810 · PhilanthropyPRETTY IN PINK…WALK OF CHAMPIONS — $500,000 · Philanthropy+9 more — $848,829 · Philanthropy+9 moreOSWEGO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,322,500 · EducationUniversity Impact — $478,371 · EducationUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $400,000 · EducationWashington and Lee University — $325,112 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL H ARTS & SCIENCES FOUNDATION — $270,000 · EducationAmerican Heritage Schools Inc — $241,450 · EducationTexas A&M Foundation — $209,000 · Education+22 more — $1,523,279 · EducationMentors International — $581,086 · InternationalBecome More — $534,000 · InternationalCoafrica — $450,000 · InternationalAcademy for Creating Enterprise — $227,000 · InternationalCENTER FOR HUMANITARIAN OUTREACH AND INTERCULTURAL EXCHANGE — $155,500 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $100,000 · InternationalLINK GLOBAL — $97,000 · International+10 more — $529,523 · InternationalSAFE HARBOR CRISIS CENTER — $577,264 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC — $172,000 · Human ServicesA CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION — $139,186 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $135,000 · Human ServicesCREWE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $117,523 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION FOR GENERATIONS — $100,000 · Human ServicesONE HEART WORLDWIDE — $95,000 · Human ServicesMANUELITO NAVAJO CHILDRENS HOME — $81,063 · Human ServicesRising Star Outreach Inc — $75,500 · Human Services+11 more — $528,580 · Human ServicesTHE MCCANDLESS COLLECTION INC — $1,050,000 · Arts & CultureUTAH FILM CENTER — $176,992 · Arts & CultureHarbor Fund — $112,500 · Arts & CultureINDEPENDENT FEATURE PROJECT INC — $75,000 · Arts & CultureCASTLE AIR MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC — $66,000 · Arts & CultureWILFORD WOODRUFF PAPERS FOUNDATION — $62,500 · Arts & Culture+7 more — $308,426 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN HIGHLANDS RESERVE INC — $1,565,000 · EnvironmentCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND — $70,100 · Environment+2 more — $83,000 · Environment
Other$64,062,372Philanthropy$11,582,544Education$4,769,712International$2,674,109Human Services$2,021,116Arts & Culture$1,851,418Environment$1,718,100

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $6,798,508 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN HIGHLANDS RESERVE INC — $1,565,000 over 3y, 78% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $1,381,820 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBH ROBERTS FOUNDATION — $1,350,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetOK Foundation — $1,335,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetOSWEGO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,322,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $1,313,897 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MCCANDLESS COLLECTION INC — $1,050,000 over 3y, 82% of budgetPRETTY IN PINK FOUNDATION INC — $785,810 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetB MOORE FOUNDATION INC — $652,032 over 2y, 44% of budgetMentors International — $581,086 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetSAFE HARBOR CRISIS CENTER — $577,264 over 1y, 14% of budgetBecome More — $534,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetWALK OF CHAMPIONS — $500,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetUniversity Impact — $478,371 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCoafrica — $450,000 over 1y, 68% of budgetUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $400,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN ROYAL ASSOCIATION INC — $341,750 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetWashington and Lee University — $325,112 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL H ARTS & SCIENCES FOUNDATION — $270,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPARTNERS FOR JUSTICE INC — $260,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE AMERICA — $250,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetAmerican Heritage Schools Inc — $241,450 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAcademy for Creating Enterprise — $227,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $225,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $209,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFUNDAMENTAL HEALTH — $207,319 over 2y, 56% of budgetPorch-Hillsborough — $200,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetUtah Sports Commission Foundation — $200,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc — $200,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY FOUNDATION — $192,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetORCHARD AFRICA — $188,500 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetRAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND — $180,615 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FILM CENTER — $176,992 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC — $172,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR HUMANITARIAN OUTREACH AND INTERCULTURAL EXCHANGE — $155,500 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE CHARITIES INC — $155,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetChrist is the Light of the World - Tree of Life Foundation — $155,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBall State University Foundation Inc — $150,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetA CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION — $139,186 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetPROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $135,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSHALOM CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ASSOCIATION — $120,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSummit Classical Christian School — $118,052 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCREWE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $117,523 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHarbor Fund — $112,500 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetTHE HUMAN TRAFFICKING INSTITUTE — $110,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetThe Other Side Academy — $109,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOLLOW THE FLAG — $107,000 over 3y, 34% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Sorenson Legacy Found…Larry H Miller and Ga…Beesley Family Founda…George S and Dolores …The Ashton Family Fou…doTERRA Healing Hands…Community Trust of Ut…Bertin Family Foundat…The Miner FoundationWcf FoundationThe Pi Foundation Inc
The Community Foundation of UtahUT49.1× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Utah · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Beesley Family Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · The Ashton Family Foundation · doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation · Community Trust of Utah · Bertin Family Foundation · The Miner Foundation · Wcf Foundation · The Pi Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization University Impact funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Career Resources Inc — 35% of income from government
  • Boston Philharmonic Orchestra Corporation — 1% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to University Impact?

Find your warmest path to University Impact through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 482 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines