Skip to content

South Dakota · Nonprofit

WORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC

WORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC (South Dakota) receives grants from 24 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,054,063 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF THE BLACK HILLS ($532,040). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$2.7M
Funders on record
24
Grants received
$2.1M
Net assets
$4.1M
17/24 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 24%
01What it does

What Working Against Violence Inc does

Mission

The organization works to create a community free of domestic abuse and sexual assault through advocacy, education, and support services.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Shelter: provide temporary, emergency, safe shelter to victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. Services include: meals, personal care items, transportation, safety planning, children's needs, information and referrals, emergency financial assistance, emotional support, support groups and community partner referrals/education (financial planning and management, health and nutrition). Domestic violence: provide comprehensive case management services, such as referrals, education, emergency financial and needs assistance, and personalized action and safety plans to victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. Provide 24 hour emergency telephone support and provide trained advocates to respond to emergency room calls. Wavi provided numberous services to 2,877 victims of domestic violence in 2025. Sexual assault: provide comprehensive case management services, such as referrals, education, emergency financial and needs assistance and personalized action and safety plans to victims of sexual assault. Provide 24 hour emergency telephone support and provide trained advocates to respond to emergency room calls. Wavi provided numerous services to 116 victims of sexual assault…

    $2,072,251 spentof which $45,181 as grants$87,004 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $2,072,251.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.0M) Expenses 100 ($1.0M) Net assets 100 ($2.0M)2018 Revenue 127 ($1.3M) Expenses 114 ($1.2M) Net assets 106 ($2.2M)2019 Revenue 138 ($1.4M) Expenses 117 ($1.2M) Net assets 118 ($2.4M)2020 Revenue 164 ($1.7M) Expenses 121 ($1.3M) Net assets 141 ($2.9M)2021 Revenue 199 ($2.1M) Expenses 153 ($1.6M) Net assets 168 ($3.4M)2022 Revenue 209 ($2.2M) Expenses 188 ($2.0M) Net assets 172 ($3.5M)2023 Revenue 233 ($2.4M) Expenses 210 ($2.2M) Net assets 187 ($3.8M)2024 Revenue 203 ($2.1M) Expenses 223 ($2.3M) Net assets 180 ($3.7M)2025 Revenue 257 ($2.7M) Expenses 222 ($2.3M) Net assets 202 ($4.1M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (257)Expenses (222)Net assets (202)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $3.0M to $3.9M (+34%).

$2.1M
$2.2M
$2.5M
$3.0M
$3.9M
$4.1M
$4.3M
$4.2M
$4.7M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 48% · 2018 48% · 2019 51% · 2020 44% · 2021 54% · 2022 52% · 2023 54% · 2024 50% · 2025 62%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$718
’17
$133k
’18
$224k
’19
$446k
’20
$478k
’21
$218k
’22
$239k
’23
−$216k
’24
$363k
’25
6.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed151517161715191414
Joined·+3+6+3+5+3+8+2+3
No longer listed·34445473
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 6 funders to 15 funders, grant income rose $138k → $593k.

8 of 24 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 27% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 26% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

53% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC.

26%
largest funder
58%
top three
~7
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 52% · 2018 61% · 2019 61% · 2020 54% · 2021 47% · 2022 24% · 2023 64% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

82% of WORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 71% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

93% of WORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC's grant income comes from South Dakota funders.

MT
MN
WI
SD
IA
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
GA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
South Dakota out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $549k arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like WORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In South Dakota

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

90% of spending goes to programs.

Program 90%Management 9%Fundraising 2%

Governance

12
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

90%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC?
WORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC (South Dakota) receives grants from 24 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,054,063 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF THE BLACK HILLS ($532,040). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC have?
IRS filings report 24 organizations giving $2,054,063 in grants to WORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC, 17 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC?
UNITED WAY OF THE BLACK HILLS is the largest funder on record, with $532,040 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in South Dakota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Working Against Violence →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 24 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing