Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc

Conducting and supporting activities for the benefit of ihc health services, inc.

$14M
Granted FY2024still arriving
54
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0180% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$47MHuman Services$2.2MYouth Development$517kHousing & Shelter$484kCommunity Improvement$389kPhilanthropy$340kCrime & Legal$325kEducation$323kInternational$47kOther$13M
02FY2024 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k27 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+14 grants · $12M
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$561M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEBER SCHOOL DISTRICT$5,000,000
IHC HEALTH SERVICES INC$1,541,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC$1,280,000
MOUNTAINLANDS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$600,000
ASSOCIATION FOR UTAH COMMUNITY HEALTH$584,000
MIDTOWN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC$385,000
UTAH PARTNERS FOR HEALTH$316,400
ASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH$300,000
LATINO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES$291,300
CITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE$289,500
GUADALUPE CENTER EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS INC$288,300
SOUTHWEST UTAH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$275,000
DOVE CENTER INC$254,291
CENTRAL UTAH HEALTH DEPARTMENT$252,900
WASATCH HOMELESS HEALTH CARE$247,850
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE DREAM INSTITUTE INC: $143k → 11%SENIOR CHARITY CARE FOUNDATION: $17k → 6%CACHE REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CONNECTION: $50k → 12%SAFE HARBOR CRISIS CENTER: $46k → 6%CENTRO HISPANO: $194k → 8%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE OF NORTHERN UTAH INC: $27k → 9%UTAH PRIDE CENTER INC: $14k → 8%UTAH PRIDE CENTER INC: $13k → 8%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $10k → 8%SENIOR CHARITY CARE FOUNDATION: $43k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $50k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $50k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $13k → 8%ENCIRCLE FAMILY AND YOUTH RESOURCE CENTER: $47k → 8%YMCA OF NORTHERN UTAH: $50k → 8%ENCIRCLE FAMILY AND YOUTH RESOURCE CENTER: $46k → 8%SOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC: $48k → 8%HOLDING OUT HELP INC: $50k → 8%SOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC: $45k → 8%ASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $300k → 8%ASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $50k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $12k → 8%LATINO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $291k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $50k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $46k → 8%UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $25k → 8%UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $25k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $49k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $26k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$53M · 60 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

60 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
39

Total granted

$53M
$4.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+9%

Still filing today

97%
87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10M · revenue +26%
  • AF
    Association for Utah Community Health
    6× · 2017–2024 · $9.7M · revenue +9% · 83% of their budget
  • IH
    IHC HEALTH SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $9.1M · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • SO
    STATE OF UTAH GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $1.8M
  • UN
    UTAH NON-PROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION
    one grant, 2020 · $310k · revenue +10%
  • UD
    UTAH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ADVISORY COUNCILgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue +49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
2
Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake

To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…

—
3
Utah Valley Family Support Center Inc

Provide services to victims and potential victims of child abuse and neglect.

—
4
Utah Public Health Association

The Utah Public Health Association (UPHA) is a statewide membership organization dedicated to improving the health of Utah communities by supporting and representing the public health workforce. UPHA advances public health through…

Health
5
Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce

Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.

—
6
Utah Foster Care Foundation Inc

We serve Utah's children by finding, educating, and nurturing families to meet the needs of children in foster care

Human Services
7
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
8
Utah Association of Family Support Centers Inc

The mission of the fscu is to strengthen utah families one community at a time by supporting parents, protecting children, and preserving families. to accomplish this mission, each family support center provides its clients with a 24-hour…

—
9
Shelter Providers of Utah

To help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction, community engagement, and education.

—
10
Utah Housing Coalition Inc

The promotion of low-income housing within the state of utah.

—
11
One Utah Health Collaborative

The organization's purpose is focused on improving and advancing health care in utah to be more affordable, with better health outcomes by accelerating, enabling and promoting healthcare innovation.

Health
12
Utah Parent Center Inc

Our mission is to help parents help their children, youth and young adults with all disabilities to live included, productive lives as members of the community.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Health & Human Rights Project and the most unlike its peers is The Good Samaritan Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%1%<5yr16%7%5–10yr18%16%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr8%35%35–55yr14%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr16%2%5–10yr18%3%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr8%59%35–55yr14%7%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/120
the rest of the field
16%
1,223/7,775

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

109 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 109 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
32
Early backer (in before they grew)
108/109
Grantees still filing
77/109
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $10,240,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INCAssociation for Utah Community Health — $9,699,346 · HealthAssociation for Utah Community HealthIHC HEALTH SERVICES INC — $9,088,000 · HealthIHC HEALTH SERVICES INCMountainlands Community Health Center — $4,976,754 · HealthMountainlands Community Health CenterMidtown Community Health Center Inc — $3,400,000 · HealthMidtown Community Health Center IncWasatch Homeless Health Care — $2,437,325 · HealthSOUTHWEST UTAH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $2,347,674 · Health+30 more — $4,840,849 · Health+30 moreWeber School District — $5,000,000 · OtherWeber School DistrictSTATE OF UTAH GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT — $1,779,124 · OtherSTATE OF UTAH GOVERNOR'…UNIVERSITY OF UTAH — $1,174,961 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH — $1,064,661 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER U…+46 more — $4,613,377 · Other+46 moreASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH — $350,000 · Human ServicesCITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE — $339,500 · Human ServicesLATINO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES — $291,300 · Human ServicesCentro Hispano — $193,800 · Human ServicesTHE DREAM INSTITUTE INC — $143,250 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER — $113,102 · Human ServicesTHE INN BETWEEN — $95,607 · Human ServicesSOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC — $92,750 · Human ServicesEncircle Family and Youth Resource Center — $92,607 · Human ServicesNeighborhood House Association — $74,270 · Human Services+11 more — $425,720 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - UTAH — $251,175 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS — $119,210 · Youth DevelopmentSPY HOP PRODUCTIONS — $96,331 · Youth DevelopmentKEN GARFF FOR GOOD — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentDOVE CENTER INC — $368,897 · Housing & ShelterSalt Lake Neighborhood Housing Services DBA Neighborworks Salt Lake — $114,821 · Housing & ShelterCherish Families — $293,334 · Community ImprovementThe Center for Economic Opportunity and Belonging — $50,000 · Community ImprovementEnvision Utah — $45,917 · Community ImprovementUTAH'S PROMISE — $241,000 · PhilanthropySalt Lake Education Foundation — $50,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN UTAH — $49,250 · Philanthropy
Health$47,029,948Other$13,632,123Human Services$2,211,906Youth Development$516,716Housing & Shelter$483,718Community Improvement$389,251Philanthropy$340,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $10,240,000 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetAssociation for Utah Community Health — $9,699,346 over 6y, 83% of budgetIHC HEALTH SERVICES INC — $9,088,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMountainlands Community Health Center — $4,976,754 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetMidtown Community Health Center Inc — $3,400,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetWasatch Homeless Health Care — $2,437,325 over 8y, 6.9% of budgetSOUTHWEST UTAH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $2,347,674 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetUTAH PARTNERS FOR HEALTH — $1,070,540 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH — $1,064,661 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetHoly Cross Ministries of Utah — $776,235 over 4y, 14% of budgetDOVE CENTER INC — $368,897 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH — $350,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetCITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE — $339,500 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetUTAH NON-PROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION — $310,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetUTAH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ADVISORY COUNCIL — $300,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCherish Families — $293,334 over 1y, 11% of budgetLATINO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES — $291,300 over 1y, 23% of budgetGUADALUPE CENTER EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS INC — $288,300 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH — $266,364 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc — $257,189 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - UTAH — $251,175 over 1y, 20% of budgetUTAH'S PROMISE — $241,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $229,197 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF UTAH COUNTY INC — $225,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetUTAH HEALTH & HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT — $224,574 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetJewish Family Service — $212,053 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetTHE SHARING PLACE — $194,048 over 4y, 17% of budgetCentro Hispano — $193,800 over 1y, 16% of budgetCREEK VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC — $193,250 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetSALT LAKE DONATED DENTAL SERVICES — $187,089 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetODYSSEY HOUSE INC - UTAH — $175,677 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUtah Aids Foundation — $173,225 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetALLIANCE HOUSE INC — $159,384 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetMaliheh Free Clinic — $159,091 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SALT LAKE — $158,105 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetVALLEY MENTAL HEALTH INCORPORATED — $147,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPeople's Health Clicnic — $145,507 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetFRIENDS FOR SIGHT — $145,163 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetTHE DREAM INSTITUTE INC — $143,250 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetFamily Health Services Corporation — $134,425 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FAMILY PLACE UTAH FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHILD & FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF CACHE — $129,660 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetUnited Way of Central and Southern Utah — $123,233 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetEYE CARE FOR KIDS - Utah — $120,534 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS — $119,210 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY NURSING SERVICE — $116,231 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDavis Education Foundation — $115,625 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSalt Lake Neighborhood Housing Services DBA Neighborworks Salt Lake — $114,821 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER — $113,102 over 3y, 2.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy Found…Ihc Health Services I…George S and Dolores …Utah's PromiseLawrence & Janet Dee …Larry H Miller and Ga…Utah Medical Associat…The Community Foundat…Dominion Energy Chari…Kennecott Utah Copper…Hemingway FoundationMarriner S Eccles Fou…
Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT138.3× affinity70 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Utah's Promise · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Utah Medical Association Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · Hemingway Foundation · Marriner S Eccles Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    50report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 120 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines