Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Utah · Nonprofit

ROAM HUMANITARIAN

ROAM HUMANITARIAN (Utah) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $831,039 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($283,292). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 83% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$1.4M
Revenue FY2025
12
Funders on record
$831k
Grants received
$800k
Net assets
6/12 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 15%

Against its field

ROAM HUMANITARIAN runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 922 youth development nonprofits its size.

Operating margin22% · top quartile
Months of reserve5.8mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)75% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 922 youth development nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($151k) Expenses 100 ($62k) Net assets 100 ($89k)2022 Revenue 291 ($439k) Expenses 623 ($383k) Net assets 63 ($56k)2023 Revenue 613 ($924k) Expenses 1200 ($738k) Net assets 467 ($417k)2024 Revenue 1196 ($1.8M) Expenses 2402 ($1.5M) Net assets 538 ($480k)2025 Revenue 940 ($1.4M) Expenses 1795 ($1.1M) Net assets 897 ($800k)
20212022202320242025
Revenue (940)Expenses (1795)Net assets (897)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of ROAM HUMANITARIAN’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (82% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,026 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$89k
21
$56k
22
$186k
23
$325k
24
$314k
25
5.8
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2022 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 5 funders, grant income rose $68k → $100k.

7 of 12 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)83% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ROAM HUMANITARIAN’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 11 of 12 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ROAM HUMANITARIAN leans on a few funders — its largest provides 34% of grant income and the top three 76%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

85% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ROAM HUMANITARIAN.

34%
largest funder
76%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 64% · 2023 49%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

83% of ROAM HUMANITARIAN's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $144k that is directly attributable, 79% of it comes from funders outside Utah, across 3 states.

MT
NV
UT

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $687k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 12 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like ROAM HUMANITARIAN

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 10%Fundraising 2%

Governance

5
board members
0%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ROAM HUMANITARIAN: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ROAM HUMANITARIAN?
ROAM HUMANITARIAN (Utah) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $831,039 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($283,292). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 83% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does ROAM HUMANITARIAN have?
IRS filings report 12 organizations giving $831,039 in grants to ROAM HUMANITARIAN, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ROAM HUMANITARIAN?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $283,292 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ROAM HUMANITARIAN find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2021–2025), and the filings of 12funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing