· Community foundation
Community Foundation of Jackson Hole
To improve lives through philanthropic leadership
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 374 grants below total $39,642,052 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $41,465,407 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,823,355 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k42 grants · $313k
- $10k–50k166 grants · $3.8M
- $50k–250k125 grants · $13M
- $250k+41 grants · $23M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ONE22 INC | $1,433,481 |
| ST JOHN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION | $1,202,422 |
| CACHE HUMANE SOCIETY | $1,025,220 |
| TETON COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE FOUNDATION | $1,017,283 |
| CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $873,217 |
| DOUG COOMBS FOUNDATION | $826,847 |
| ST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF JACKSON HOLE | $807,607 |
| JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST | $782,665 |
| TETON COUNTY SHERIFF'S AUXILIARY | $774,840 |
| GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION | $733,983 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE GREATER TETON AREA | $703,943 |
| DANCERS' WORKSHOP | $687,044 |
| JACKSON HOLE COMMUNITY HOUSING TRUST | $627,299 |
| MAYO CLINIC | $625,000 |
| TETON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES | $591,749 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $11.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Community Foundation of Jackson Hole’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 78% of the giving stays in WY; read by stated purpose it is 75% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
390 repeat relationships — 303 still active in FY2024, 87 since wound down; 56 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.8M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OIOne22 Inc6× · 2019–2024 · $8.2M · revenue +84% · 40% of their budget
- SJSt John's Health Foundation6× · 2019–2024 · $6.1M · revenue +8% · 34% of their budget
- TYTETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES6× · 2019–2024 · $4.3M · revenue +82% · 29% of their budget
Funded once
- DGDana-FarberMass General Brigham Cancer Care INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $3.0M · revenue +29%
- MGMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDone grant, 2023 · $2.5M
- RLRANGELEY LAKES HERITAGE TRUST INCone grant, 2023 · $1.1M · revenue -24%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the Jackson hole chamber of commerce is to champion the interest of local businesses, enhance their prosperity and strengthen the economic climate of teton county
To fuel local, regional and global tech ecosystems to shape a better future.
To improve the quality of life in rural intermountain west communities by protecting, owning, and creating locally significant keystone conservation properties as public access parks.
The glacier national park conservancy works to preserve and protect glacier national park for future generations.
The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.
Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.
To conserve, protect and restore montana's coldwater fisheries and watersheds.
Icl's mission is to create a conservation community and pragmatic, enduring solutions that protect and restore the air you breathe, the water you drink, and the land and wildlife you love.
To create oppurtunites for conservation of natural, scenic, historic, recreational and agricultural values of southwestern idaho's open spaces through collabarative efforts for current and future generations. the land trust indentifies…
Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…
The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.
To collectively serve as a catalyst for engagement and bonding of people to our wildlife and public lands in montana through a sense of place, education, access, research and stewardship.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Protect Our Water Jackson Hole Inc and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Applied Bio Linguistic Exploration. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
453 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 453 of the 563 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds One22 Inc ↗
- Who funds St John's Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds TETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Teton County Search & Rescue Foundation ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Community Center for the Arts ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds TETON RAPTOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds Dana-FarberMass General Brigham Cancer Care INC ↗
- Who funds GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SAFETY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HOLE COMMUNITY HOUSING TRUST ↗
- Who funds TETON LITERACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Doug Coombs Foundation ↗
- Who funds Teton County Library Foundation & Friends ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HOLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CENTER OF JACKSON HOLE INC ↗
- Who funds Hole Food Rescue ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH & RECOVERY SERVICES OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of the Greater Teton Area ↗
- Who funds PAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING ↗
- Who funds GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds DANCERS WORKSHOP ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF PATHWAYS ↗
- Who funds Maine Coast Heritage Trust ↗
- Who funds PROTECT OUR WATER JACKSON HOLE INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN MISSION ↗
- Who funds TETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ENTRY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HOLE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ↗
- Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Karl M Johnson Foundation · The Brooks Foundation · Hughes Charitable Foundation · The Teton Springs Foundation Inc 01 · Wyoming Community Foundation · Wyoming Humanities Council · The Andrew Allen Charitable Foundation · Hughes Charitable Foundation · Wyoming Assn of Non Profit Organizations dba Wyoming Nonprofit Network · Giving Brands · Kemmerer Family Foundation · Perkins Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Foundation of Jackson Hole funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- North Florida Land Trust Inc — 81% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Partnership for Gulf Coast Land Conservation Inc — 7% of income from government
- Williams College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.