· Private foundation
Hughes Charitable Foundation
Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| WIND RIVER DEVELOPMENT FUND | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $897k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2021, 20 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SLSAN LUIS OBISPO REPERTORY THEATRE2× · 2019–2020 · $498k · revenue +154%
- CDCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING3× · 2018–2020 · $350k · revenue +32%
- SJSt John's Health Foundation2× · 2019–2020 · $303k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- CCCOMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $250k · revenue +519%
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SLO COUNTYone grant, 2019 · $150k
- FCFAMILY CARE NETWORK INCone grant, 2019 · $143k · revenue +20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the Jackson hole chamber of commerce is to champion the interest of local businesses, enhance their prosperity and strengthen the economic climate of teton county
Our mission is to promote mental wellness in teton valley by providing outreach, education, and connection to services.
To companion the end of life journey with skill and compassion.
To provide professional counseling services related primarily to mental health and substance abuse to the residents of Carbon County, Wyoming.
Provide low income, working families with children, the tools and resources needed to achieve and maintain first time home ownership.
Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.
Teton Valley Health Care Foundation strives to build mutually beneficial relationships with community members, businesses, and guests that, through their generosity, support a healthy and thriving valley. (Continued on Schedule O). Through…
Provide food for individuals in need
To unite people to advance wyoming wildlife habitat, research, and education.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Our mission is to encourage high-value, low-impact job creation; provide value and service to the business community and enhance the overall prosperity of teton valley.
Wyofile is an independent, nonprofit news service focused on the people, places and policy of wyoming. recognizing the rapid decline in resources among traditional news outlets, wyofile offers in-depth coverage of complicated subjects and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wyoming Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Array Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAN LUIS OBISPO REPERTORY THEATRE ↗
- Who funds CLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING ↗
- Who funds St John's Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of the Greater Teton Area ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LANDER PET CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds WIND RIVER DEVELOPMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds Hole Food Rescue ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ENTRY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CARE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds TETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA RANGELAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds One22 Inc ↗
- Who funds Art Partners ↗
- Who funds TETON LITERACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SLO NOOR FOUNDATION A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Cathedral Home for Children ↗
- Who funds Teton County Search & Rescue Foundation ↗
- Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF PATHWAYS ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE SANTA FE CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SAN LUIS OBISPO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK COALITION OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WYOMING GOVERNOR'S RESIDENCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Buffalo Bill Memorial Association ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA MID-STATE FAIR HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CULTIVATE ABILITY ↗
- Who funds YOUTH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Douglas ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hughes Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Wyoming Community Foundation · The Community Foundation San Luis Obispo · The Andrew Allen Charitable Foundation · Wyoming Assn of Non Profit Organizations dba Wyoming Nonprofit Network · Karl M Johnson Foundation · The Brooks Foundation · Perkins Charitable Foundation · The Ladd Family Foundation · The McKnight Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hughes Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hughes Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hughes Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.