· Private foundation
The Andrew Allen Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k128 grants · $241k
- $10k–50k28 grants · $572k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $333k
- $250k+1 grant · $330k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION | $329,546 |
| VANDERBILT CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $100,000 |
| NATIONAL MS SOCIETY | $100,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $76,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LARAMIE COUNTY | $56,746 |
| CENTENIAL PARK CONSERVATION | $40,000 |
| NASHVILLE SYMPHONY | $40,000 |
| NASHVILLE PUBLIC RADIO | $35,746 |
| CHEEKWOOD BOTANICAL GARDEN & MUSEUM | $35,000 |
| FRIST ART MUSEUM | $35,000 |
| NASHVILLE PUBLIC TELEVISION | $30,000 |
| CHEYENNE ANIMAL SHELTER | $25,800 |
| VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL | $25,000 |
| NATURE CONSERVATORY OF TENNESSEE | $20,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $199k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.
147 repeat relationships — 116 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 42 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION5× · 2021–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +28%
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC5× · 2021–2025 · $376k · revenue +74%- CBCHEEKWOOD BOTANICAL GARDEN AND MUSEUM OF ART5× · 2021–2025 · $146k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- WIWYOMING IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY PROJECTone grant, 2024 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $10k
- SCSigma Chi Foundationone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Cowboy state daily's mission is to provide high-quality local and statewide reporting on the issues that impact wyoming, featuring stories that capture wyoming's wonderful "small town with long streets" vibe.
Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.
The wyoming civic engagement network strives for equitable voter participation by building power in marginalized and under-resourced communities, growing the capacity of their leaders and organizations, facilitating equitable access to…
The organizations mission is to connect people who care with causes that matter to build a better wyoming. the wyoming community foundation is a charitable organization which builds and preserves funds established by individuals, families,…
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Wyoming wildlife federation delivers leadership in conservation for the state's wildlife, hunters, anglers, and conservationists through policy, education, advocacy, and habitat.
To promote science-based wildlife management that fosters ecosystem health and dynamic equilibrium between species throughout the state of wyoming.
To unite people to advance wyoming wildlife habitat, research, and education.
Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.
Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kwhs Booster Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
174 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 174 of the 263 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds CHEEKWOOD BOTANICAL GARDEN AND MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds FRIST ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds Nashville Symphony Association ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE PUBLIC TELEVISION INC ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION OF WYOMING ↗
- Who funds Wellesley College ↗
- Who funds GOVERNOR'S EARLY LITERACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL APHASIA ASSOCIATION I ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LARAMIE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CHEYENNE ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Williams College ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America ↗
- Who funds Black Dog Animal Rescue ↗
- Who funds Teton County Library Foundation & Friends ↗
- Who funds TETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SAFEHOUSE SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Wyoming Assn of Non Profit Organizations dba Wyoming Nonprofit Network · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Taco Johns Foundation · Hughes Charitable Foundation · Joannides Family Foundation · The Steven & Laurie Eskind Family Foundation · The John P Ellbogen Foundation · Memorial Foundation Inc · Hughes Charitable Foundation · The Brooks Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Andrew Allen Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Amelia Island Museum of History Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Williams College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.