· Private foundation
The Teton Springs Foundation Inc 01
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of THE TETON SPRINGS FOUNDATION INC 01’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TETON VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH COAILITI | $15,000 |
| TETON COUNTY 4H | $5,000 |
| VALLEY OF THE TETON LIBRARY | $4,000 |
| TETON VALLEY TRAILS PATHWAYS | $2,900 |
| ABC ABOVE AND BEYOND CLASSROOM | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| MOUNTAIN BIKE THE TETONS INC | $2,000 |
| DOWNTOWN DRIGGS ASSOCIATION 1 | $1,700 |
| TETON VALLEY COMMUNITY RECYCLING | $930 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +133% since the first grant, against +62% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AAABC ABOVE AND BEYOND THE CLASSROOM IN TETON VALLEY INCORPORATED4× · 2020–2024 · $18k · revenue +171%
- TRTETON ROCK GYM INC4× · 2018–2023 · $13k · revenue +133%
- FSFAMILY SAFETY NETWORK INC3× · 2017–2020 · $13k · revenue +90%
Funded once
- SWSENIORS WEST OF THE TETONone grant, 2023 · $25k
- TVTETON VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH COALITIOone grant, 2020 · $8k
- HTHAPI TRAILS - HORSE ADOPTION PROGRAM INCORPORATEDgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mountain biking club
Our mission is to shape policy, guide development, and provide outreach to preserve natural resources, protect rural character, and promote vibrant communities in teton valley through civic action.
The mission of the teton regional land trust is to conserve working farms and ranches, fish and wildlife habitat, and scenic open spaces in eastern idaho for this and future generations.
Research, education, and action that enhance the sustainability, resilience, and transformation of human relationships with the environment.
Grand Teton National Park Foundation (the Foundation) is a private, nonprofit organization whose mission is to partner with Grand Teton National Park to steward, protect, and enhance all that is special in the park. Budget limitations,…
CWTA seeks to preserve, protect, and promote mountain biking, trail running, hiking and equestrian access on public and publicly accessible private lands. Through effective communication and education, we advocate for diverse use…
Jackson hole nordic alliance connects people & winter trails. we are the resource hub for local nordic, fat bike, snowshoe & trail information. we help build the winter trails community & promote responsible recreation.
The mission of teton valley ranch camp is to provide inspiring western adventure in the jackson hole and yellowstone area.
Our mission is to encourage high-value, low-impact job creation; provide value and service to the business community and enhance the overall prosperity of teton valley.
To honor the western tradition bringing communities together through the power of the sport skijoring.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teton Rock Gym Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hapi Trails - Horse Adoption Program Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 40% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ABC ABOVE AND BEYOND THE CLASSROOM IN TETON VALLEY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds TETON ROCK GYM INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SAFETY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds TETON VALLEY TRAILS & PATHWAYS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE TETON RIVER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER OF TETON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds VALLEY OF THE TETONS LIBRARY FOUNDATION AND FRIENDS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds TETON ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds Mountain Bike the Tetons Inc ↗
- Who funds TETON VALLEY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds TETON COUNTY SEARCH & RESCUE ↗
- Who funds TETON VALLEY COMMUNITY RECYCLING ↗
- Who funds HAPI TRAILS - HORSE ADOPTION PROGRAM INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds TETON VALLEY AQUATICS LTD ↗
- Who funds TETON VALLEY YOUTH LACROSSE ASSOCIA ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds TETON VALLEY SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TETON WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ACTIVELY PARTICIPATING ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN DRIGGS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Teton Valley Foundation ↗
- Who funds TETON VALLEY COMMUNITY ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF TETON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Valley Adaptive Sports ↗
- Who funds PAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds TETON ADAPTIVE ↗
- Who funds FULL CIRCLE EDUCATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Chc Foundation · Faraway Foundation · Karl M Johnson Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Spark Foundation Inc · M Lazy M Foundation · Donald C Brace Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Teton Springs Foundation Inc 01 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Teton Springs Foundation Inc 01?
Find your warmest path to The Teton Springs Foundation Inc 01 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.