Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Biotechnology Innovation Organization

The BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATION (bio) represents approximately 1,000 companies and organizations in washington dc, state capitals, and international fora.

$2.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
61
Grants FY2024still arriving
29
States reached
$195k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$4.8MPublic Benefit$3.0MCommunity Improvement$2.9MFood & Nutrition$953kScience & Tech$699kEnvironment$565kCivil Rights$305kSocial Science$195kOther$0
02FY2024 · 61 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 61 grants below total $1,451,600 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,331,287 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $879,687 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $107k
  • $10k–50k38 grants · $635k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $710k
$10,000
Median grant
29
States reached
$170M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REPUBLICAN GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION$195,000
BAYH DOLE COALITION$140,000
REPUBLICAN STATE LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE$130,000
DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION$110,000
NATIONAL HEALTH COUNCIL INC$75,000
NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES$60,000
HEALTHCARE READY$40,000
RESEARCHAMERICA$40,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC$27,500
GOPAC EDUCATION FUND$25,000
THE GOVERNING MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND$25,000
CENTER FOR FOOD INTEGRITY INC$25,000
DEMOCRATIC LIEUTENANT GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION$25,000
IBIO (ILLINOIS BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATION)$25,000
THE GLOBAL WOMEN'S INNOVATION NETWORK (GLOBALWIN)$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $217k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PARENT PROJECT FOR MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY RESEARCH INC: $12k → 7%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $150k → 17%CAPITAL CLUBHOUSE INC: $10k → 14%NATIONAL CAUCUS AND CENTER ON BACK AGING: $30k → 14%CAPITAL CLUBHOUSE INC: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 93 repeat orgs$3.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

93 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2024, 50 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

93
81

Total granted

$11M
$2.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+23%

Still filing today

89%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $398k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    Chamber of Commerce of the USA
    6× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +42%
  • CL
    CALIFORNIA LIFE SCIENCES ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $786k · revenue +24%
  • ON
    ONE NATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $750k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • MF
    MAJORITY FORWARD
    one grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue +123%
  • PF
    PARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE FUTURE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $300k · revenue -58%
  • AF
    AB FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +161%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Biotechnology Innovation Organization

The biotechnology innovation organization (bio) represents approximately 1,000 companies and organizations in washington dc, state capitals, and international fora. bio is founded on the principle that policy must nurture innovation in the…

—
2
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
3
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
4
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
5
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
6
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology

The federation of american societies for experimental biology (faseb) advances health and welfare by promoting progress and education in biological and biomedical sciences through service to its member societies and collaborative advocacy.

—
7
The American Neurological Association

Advancing science, education, and careers to improve neurologic health for all.

Health
8
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
9
Casss

Casss sponsors international symposia for scientists in the biotechnology, pharmaceutical and academic arenas. furthermore, casss provides educational, employment, and networking opportunities for its current members.

—
10
The Genetics Society of America in

Gsa serves an international community of scientists who use genetics to make new discoveries and improve lives. we advance biological research by supporting professional development of scientists, by communicating advances and fostering…

—
11
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
12
The N 1 Collaborative Inc

To make individualized medicines routinely and rapidly accessible to rare disease patients worldwide.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Society for Women's Health Research and the most unlike its peers is Farmers Alliance for Integrated Resources. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Women & Girls Leadership De…Immigrant Worker SupportCancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsSenior Support ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportAddiction Recovery ServicesFood Banks and PantriesPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%34%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.5%1/207
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,358

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

170 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 170 of the 192 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
44
Early backer (in before they grew)
165/170
Grantees still filing
118/170
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Chamber of Commerce of the USA — $1,330,000 · OtherChamber of Commerce of the USAMAJORITY FORWARD — $500,000 · OtherMAJORITY FORWARDFUELSAMERICA — $500,000 · OtherFUELSAMERICANational Health Council Inc — $468,500 · OtherNational Health Council IncAlliance to Protect Medical Innovation — $455,000 · OtherAlliance to Protect Medical InnovationRepublican Governors Association — $420,000 · OtherBIONJ INC — $325,000 · OtherPARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE FUTURE INC — $300,000 · OtherDEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION — $295,000 · Other+84 more — $3,406,945 · Other+84 moreLUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $349,000 · HealthLUPUS FOUNDATION O…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $222,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SO…EVERYLIFE FOUNDATION FOR RARE DISEASES — $165,000 · HealthEVERYLIFE FOUNDATI…ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC — $122,000 · HealthHealthcare Ready — $95,000 · HealthSICK CELLS — $85,000 · HealthNATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION — $78,250 · Health+50 more — $1,225,000 · Health+50 moreCALIFORNIA LIFE SCIENCES ASSOCIATION — $785,500 · Community ImprovementCALIFORNIA LIFE S…HAWAII CROP IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION — $626,500 · Community ImprovementHAWAII CROP IMPRO…Information Technology and Innovation Foundation — $120,000 · Community ImprovementInformation Techn…TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL OF MARYLAND — $96,250 · Community ImprovementNEW YORK BIOTECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION INC — $77,500 · Community ImprovementMontana Bioscience Alliance — $77,000 · Community Improvement+13 more — $455,650 · Community Improvement+13 moreONE NATION — $750,000 · Public BenefitONE NATIO…AB FOUNDATION — $250,000 · Public BenefitAB FOUNDA…CENTER FORWARD — $70,000 · Public BenefitCENTER FO…+5 more — $97,500 · Public Benefit+5 moreNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL CAUCUS AND CENTER ON BLACK AGING INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesCapital Clubhouse Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE PARENT PROJECT FOR MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY RESEARCH INC — $12,000 · Human ServicesLULAC INSTITUTE INC — $150,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR SARCOIDOSIS RESEARCH — $16,500 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · PhilanthropyGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 · EducationNUS AMERICA FOUNDATION INC — $47,000 · EducationAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF VETERINARY MEDICAL COLLEGES — $25,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts College — $12,000 · EducationTHE PLENARY CO — $10,000 · EducationKANSAS BIOSCIENCE ORGANIZATION INC — $8,000 · EducationGLOBAL LIVER INSTITUTE INC — $7,500 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $6,500 · Education
Other$8,000,445Health$2,341,750Community Improvement$2,238,400Public Benefit$1,167,500Human Services$217,000Philanthropy$181,500Education$181,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChamber of Commerce of the USA — $1,330,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA LIFE SCIENCES ASSOCIATION — $785,500 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetONE NATION — $750,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHAWAII CROP IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION — $626,500 over 3y, 71% of budgetNational Health Council Inc — $468,500 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetAlliance to Protect Medical Innovation — $455,000 over 4y, 100% of budgetLUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $349,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetBIONJ INC — $325,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE FUTURE INC — $300,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetAB FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $222,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetEVERYLIFE FOUNDATION FOR RARE DISEASES — $165,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLULAC INSTITUTE INC — $150,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetBAYH DOLE COALITION — $140,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetHudson Institute Inc — $135,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGLOBAL WOMENS INNOVATION NETWORK — $125,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR FOOD INTEGRITY INC — $125,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC — $122,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetInformation Technology and Innovation Foundation — $120,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCH — $115,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY — $110,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INNOVATION — $103,350 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetLIFE SCIENCES PENNSYLVANIA — $97,120 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTECHNOLOGY COUNCIL OF MARYLAND — $96,250 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetHealthcare Ready — $95,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA — $85,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSICK CELLS — $85,000 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetWASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION — $85,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetOregon Biotechnology Associati dba Oregon Life Sciences — $84,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetRESEARCHAMERICA — $81,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION — $78,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK BIOTECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION INC — $77,500 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetTEXAS HEALTHCARE & BIOSCIENCE INSTITUTE — $77,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetMontana Bioscience Alliance — $77,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetGOVERNING MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND — $75,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetNEHI INC — $72,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetCENTER FORWARD — $70,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOLORADO BIOSCIENCE ASSOCIATION — $65,500 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATION — $65,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetNATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES — $60,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAssociation of Asian Pacific Community Health Organizations — $60,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCENTER FOR MEDICINE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $60,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR PATIENT ACCESS — $60,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $59,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetARIZONA BIOINDUSTRY ASSOCIATION INC — $57,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Chamber of Commerce of the USA ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA LIFE SCIENCES ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ONE NATION ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII CROP IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MAJORITY FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds National Health Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds Alliance to Protect Medical Innovation ↗
  • Who funds LUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds BIONJ INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE FUTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds AB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERYLIFE FOUNDATION FOR RARE DISEASES ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds LULAC INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds BAYH DOLE COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Hudson Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL WOMENS INNOVATION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR FOOD INTEGRITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Information Technology and Innovation Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INNOVATION ↗
  • Who funds LIFE SCIENCES PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL OF MARYLAND ↗
  • Who funds Healthcare Ready ↗
  • Who funds PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds SICK CELLS ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Oregon Biotechnology Associati dba Oregon Life Sciences ↗
  • Who funds RESEARCHAMERICA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK BIOTECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pharmaceutical Resear…Advanced Medical Tech…Edison Electric Insti…Croplife AmericaThe Business Roundtab…Association for Acces…Motion Picture Associ…American Petroleum In…AARPAmerican Gas Associat…Nuclear Energy Instit…American Property Cas…
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaDC116.5× affinity73 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Advanced Medical Technology Association · Edison Electric Institute Inc · Croplife America · The Business Roundtable Inc · Association for Accessible Medicines · Motion Picture Association Inc · American Petroleum Institute · AARP · American Gas Association · Nuclear Energy Institute Inc · American Property Casualty Insurance Association

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Biotechnology Innovation Organization funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America — 22% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Technology Council of Maryland — 2% of income from government
  • Oregon Biotechnology Associati dba Oregon Life Sciences — 1% of income from government
  • Bionj Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Bioflorida Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Delaware Bioscience Association Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Oregonians for Food and Shelter Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Genetic Alliance Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 192 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home