Skip to content
Plinth
FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

No Labels

No Labels (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $255,100 to it, the largest being Property Casualty Insurers Association of America ($150,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$7.4M
Revenue FY2024
6
Funders on record
$255k
Grants received
$6.8M
Net assets
3/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($5.0M) Expenses 100 ($3.9M) Net assets 100 ($3.6M)2018 Revenue 103 ($5.1M) Expenses 101 ($4.0M) Net assets 131 ($4.8M)2019 Revenue 111 ($5.5M) Expenses 171 ($6.7M) Net assets 97 ($3.5M)2020 Revenue 239 ($12M) Expenses 164 ($6.4M) Net assets 246 ($8.9M)2021 Revenue 229 ($11M) Expenses 268 ($11M) Net assets 269 ($9.7M)2022 Revenue 428 ($21M) Expenses 308 ($12M) Net assets 519 ($19M)2023 Revenue 497 ($25M) Expenses 651 ($26M) Net assets 494 ($18M)2024 Revenue 150 ($7.4M) Expenses 472 ($19M) Net assets 189 ($6.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (150)Expenses (472)Net assets (189)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.0M
17
$1.1M
18
$1.2M
19
$5.4M
20
$833k
21
$9.1M
22
$911k
23
$11M
24
4.7
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $35k → $5k.

From the IRS filings of No Labels’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

No Labels leans on a few funders — its largest provides 59% of grant income and the top three 94%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

94% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund No Labels.

59%
largest funder
94%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 71% · 2018 63% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 50% · 2022 50% · 2023 100%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

No Labels draws 65% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 5 states in all.

IL
NY
VA
DC
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like No Labels

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

69% of spending goes to programs.

Program 69%Management 20%Fundraising 12%

Governance

10
board members
70%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 31 states

AK
NH
WA
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
MS
GA
FL

Part of a family of 5 related entities

  • No Labels Ballot Access Inc · exempt
  • No Labels PAC · exempt
  • No Labels Party of Arizona · exempt
  • No Labels Party of Maine · exempt
  • No Labels Rhode Island · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for No Labels: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds No Labels?
No Labels (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $255,100 to it, the largest being Property Casualty Insurers Association of America ($150,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does No Labels have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $255,100 in grants to No Labels, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of No Labels?
Property Casualty Insurers Association of America is the largest funder on record, with $150,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like No Labels find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing