Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Edison Electric Institute Inc

The edison electric institute(eei)is the association that represents all u.s.

$2.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
79
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$135k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Public Benefit$5.2MEnvironment$2.8MCommunity Improvement$1.6MCivil Rights$856kEmployment$850kYouth Development$326kArts & Culture$311kHealth$217kOther$0
02FY2024 · 79 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 79 grants below total $2,168,063 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,303,265 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $135,202 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $66k
  • $10k–50k59 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $994k
$15,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$200M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REPUBLICAN GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION$135,000
DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION$125,000
NATIONAL LABOR & MANAGEMENT PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE$125,000
CENTER FOR ENERGY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT$101,900
CONSERVATIVE CLIMATE FOUNDATION INC$100,000
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE USA$80,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR CAPITAL FORMATION CENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH$80,000
AMERICANS FOR TAX REFORM$75,000
DEMOCRATIC MAYORS ASSOCIATION$60,000
THE KEYSTONE CENTER$58,500
NATIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS OF STATE LEGISLATORS$53,683
NCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES$46,740
ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY$40,000
SENATE PRESIDENTS' FORUM INC$36,966
GOPAC INC$35,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $396k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%J STREET CUP: $30k → 9%ALL HAZARDS CONSORTIUM INC: $25k → 6%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $50k → 17%J STREET CUP: $10k → 9%ALL HAZARDS CONSORTIUM INC: $25k → 6%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $25k → 17%ALL HAZARDS CONSORTIUM INC: $25k → 6%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $25k → 17%ALL HAZARDS CONSORTIUM: $25k → 6%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $25k → 17%ALL HAZARDS CONSORTIUM INC: $25k → 6%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $25k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $10k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $10k → 17%SEXUAL MINORITY YOUTH ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INC: $10k → 14%SEXUAL MINORITY YOUTH ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INC: $9k → 14%J STREET CUP: $15k → 14%J STREET CUP: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $7k → 14%CAPITAL PRIDE ALLIANCE INCORPORATED: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
ID
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 108 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

108 repeat relationships — 67 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

108
56

Total granted

$12M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+10%

Still filing today

84%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $251k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementEnvironmentPublic BenefitArts & CultureCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR ENERGY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
    7× · 2018–2024 · $732k · revenue +48%
  • CO
    Chamber of Commerce of the USA
    7× · 2018–2024 · $463k · revenue +35%
  • NL
    NATIONAL LAMPAC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $340k · revenue +100% · 63% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    IHS GLOBAL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • MA
    Maine Affordable Energy
    one grant, 2023 · $80k · revenue -99%
  • NB
    No Blank Checks
    one grant, 2023 · $80k · revenue 0% · 27% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
2
American Council of Engineering Companies

The business association and voice of america's engineering industry, representing thousands of independent u.s. engineering companies engaged in the development of transportation, water, and other public and commercial facilities.

—
3
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
4
American Council On Education

Ace leads higher education with a united vision for the future, galvanizing our members to make change. the council collaborates across the sector to design solutions for today's challenges, serves the needs of a diverse student…

Education
5
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
6
National Center for Apec

Ncapec is the only u.s. business association focused exclusively on facilitating american private sector input to the apec process. programs typically feature discussions between business, government and academia on key trade and economic…

—
7
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

—
8
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
9
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
10
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
11
American Society of Civil Engineers Inc

To provide essential value to our members, their careers, our partners, and the public, asce will: facilitate the advancement of technology; encourage and provide the tools for lifelong learning; promote professionalism and the profession;…

Science & Tech
12
National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities

The National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities (NAICU) serves as the unified voice for the 1,700 private, nonprofit colleges and universities in our nation. (continued on Schedule O)

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Council for Capital Formation Center for Policy Research and the most unlike its peers is Hispanics in Energy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Lgbtq+ Community SupportYouth Sports ProgramsAnimal Rescue and ShelterEnvironmental Conservation …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Arts CentersMilitary Veterans SupportCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%1%<5yr14%2%5–10yr18%20%10–20yr18%23%20–35yr16%32%35–55yr15%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr14%1%5–10yr18%25%10–20yr18%19%20–35yr16%34%35–55yr15%19%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/179
the rest of the field
12%
1,600/12,822

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

145 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 145 of the 180 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
144/145
Grantees still filing
109/145
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION — $683,333 · OtherDEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATIONRepublican Governors Association — $593,333 · OtherRepublican Governors AssociationChamber of Commerce of the USA — $463,000 · OtherAmericans for Tax Reform — $457,500 · Other+118 more — $6,642,837 · Other+118 moreKEYSTONE CENTER — $278,500 · EnvironmentKEYSTONE C…ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY — $215,000 · EnvironmentALLIANCE T…CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC — $105,000 · EnvironmentCITIZENS F…Conservative Climate Foundation Inc — $100,000 · EnvironmentConservati…National Energy Resources Organization Inc — $94,000 · EnvironmentNational E…CONSUMER ENERGY ALLIANCE INC — $91,000 · EnvironmentCONSUMER E…ELECTRIC DRIVE TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION — $81,170 · EnvironmentELECTRIC D…INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH — $75,000 · EnvironmentINSTITUTE …+7 more — $154,078 · Environment+7 moreCENTER FOR ENERGY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT — $732,403 · Philanthropy+5 more — $73,500 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL LAMPAC — $340,000 · Community ImprovementAfrican American Mayors Assocation — $75,000 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF BLACK ELECTED LEGISLATIVE — $74,200 · Community ImprovementAMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY — $65,000 · Community ImprovementWestern Conference of Public Service Commissioners — $57,500 · Community ImprovementCARBON UTILIZATION RESEARCH COUNCIL — $50,000 · Community ImprovementBOARD OF LATINO LEGISLATIVE LEADERS — $30,000 · Community Improvement+7 more — $106,000 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS OF STATE LEGISLATORS — $208,683 · Civil RightsAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF BLACKS IN ENERGY — $185,000 · Civil RightsCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC — $135,000 · Civil RightsCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS POLITICAL EDU CATION AND LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE — $90,000 · Civil Rights+2 more — $25,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN COUNCIL FOR CAPITAL FORMATION CENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH — $230,000 · Public BenefitNCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES — $134,240 · Public BenefitAMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL — $71,500 · Public BenefitMid Atlantic Conference of Regulatory Utilities Comm Inc — $70,000 · Public BenefitTHE TAXPAYERS PROTECTION ALLIANCE — $50,000 · Public BenefitONE NATION — $25,000 · Public Benefit+3 more — $31,000 · Public BenefitSenate Presidents' Forum Inc — $211,966 · Arts & CultureTHE ARTISTS AND ATHLETES ALLIANCE INC — $71,666 · Arts & CultureTHE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION — $36,500 · Arts & CultureCONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE INC — $35,000 · Arts & CultureUS NAVY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $31,600 · Arts & CultureWOMEN'S COUNCIL ON ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT — $17,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$8,840,003Environment$1,193,748Philanthropy$805,903Community Improvement$797,700Civil Rights$643,683Public Benefit$611,740Arts & Culture$424,232

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTER FOR ENERGY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT — $732,403 over 7y, 11% of budgetChamber of Commerce of the USA — $463,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAmericans for Tax Reform — $457,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL LAMPAC — $340,000 over 6y, 63% of budgetKEYSTONE CENTER — $278,500 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN COUNCIL FOR CAPITAL FORMATION CENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH — $230,000 over 6y, 22% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS — $221,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY — $215,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetSenate Presidents' Forum Inc — $211,966 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetNATIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS OF STATE LEGISLATORS — $208,683 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF BLACKS IN ENERGY — $185,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetNational Black Caucus of State Legislators — $178,250 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetUNITED STATES HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $177,084 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $170,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS — $157,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES — $150,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSOME INC — $145,769 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CONGRESSIONAL INSTITUTE INC — $138,125 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC — $135,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES — $134,240 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetAll Hazards Consortium Inc — $125,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHE NATIONAL ENERGY AND UTILITY AFFORDABILITY COALITION — $120,000 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC — $108,580 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC — $105,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $105,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetConservative Climate Foundation Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetNational Energy Resources Organization Inc — $94,000 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetTHE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE — $93,542 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCONSUMER ENERGY ALLIANCE INC — $91,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetWASHINGTON TENNIS & EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $90,125 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS POLITICAL EDU CATION AND LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE — $90,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES — $90,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Third Way Foundation Inc — $90,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN LEGISLATORS INC — $89,500 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL SPORTS FOR CHARITY — $86,800 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetNALEO EDUCATIONAL FUND — $85,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetELECTRIC DRIVE TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION — $81,170 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetHORTON'S KIDS INC — $80,240 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetMaine Affordable Energy — $80,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNo Blank Checks — $80,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE ENERGY OFFICIALS — $77,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH — $75,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetAfrican American Mayors Assocation — $75,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTHE LATINO COALITION INC — $75,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF BLACK ELECTED LEGISLATIVE — $74,200 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVES — $73,485 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARTISTS AND ATHLETES ALLIANCE INC — $71,666 over 7y, 7.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTER FOR ENERGY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds Chamber of Commerce of the USA ↗
  • Who funds Americans for Tax Reform ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LAMPAC ↗
  • Who funds KEYSTONE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR CAPITAL FORMATION CENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY ↗
  • Who funds Senate Presidents' Forum Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS OF STATE LEGISLATORS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF BLACKS IN ENERGY ↗
  • Who funds National Black Caucus of State Legislators ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONGRESSIONAL INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES ↗
  • Who funds All Hazards Consortium Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL ENERGY AND UTILITY AFFORDABILITY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds CONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds Conservative Climate Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds National Energy Resources Organization Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CONSUMER ENERGY ALLIANCE INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nuclear Energy Instit…American Gas Associat…Pharmaceutical Resear…American Petroleum In…American Fuel and Pet…Ncta - the Internet &…Ctia - the Wireless A…Everytown for Gun Saf…Association for Acces…The Business Roundtab…Motion Picture Associ…The Pew Charitable Tr…
Nuclear Energy Institute IncDC67.5× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nuclear Energy Institute Inc · American Gas Association · Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · American Petroleum Institute · American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers · Ncta - the Internet & Television Association · Ctia - the Wireless Association · Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund Inc · Association for Accessible Medicines · The Business Roundtable Inc · Motion Picture Association Inc · The Pew Charitable Trusts

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Edison Electric Institute Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Forth Mobility Fund — 7% of income from government
  • A Wider Circle Inc — 6% of income from government
  • New England Conference of Public Utiliti Commissioners — 6% of income from government
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 180 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines