· Public charity
The Business Roundtable Inc
A ceo-led organization whose mission is to advocate policies that promote u.s.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $489k
- $50k–250k19 grants · $1.5M
- $250k+2 grants · $560k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TAX FOUNDATION | $310,000 |
| BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER | $250,000 |
| AMERICANS FOR TAX REFORM | $200,000 |
| FARMERS FOR FREE TRADE | $175,000 |
| BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER ACTION | $150,000 |
| AMERICAN ACTION FORUM | $150,000 |
| CENTER FOR A NEW AMERICAN SECURITY INC | $100,000 |
| BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE ACTION | $74,132 |
| NATIONAL GOV ASSOC CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES | $60,000 |
| REFORMING AMERICAS TAXES EQUITABLY | $60,000 |
| CENTER FORWARD | $55,853 |
| STATE SOLUTIONS INC | $50,000 |
| CLIMATE SOLUTIONS FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS | $50,000 |
| UNITED FOR INFRASTRUCTURE | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $7.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
46 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $274k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AAAmerican Action Network Inc4× · 2017–2023 · $7.2M · revenue +92%
- FFFARMERS FOR FREE TRADE7× · 2017–2024 · $5.7M · revenue +68% · 85% of their budget
- TFTAX FOUNDATION7× · 2018–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +50%
Funded once
- NANational Association of Wholesaler- Distributors Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $515k · revenue +103%
- BABUILDING AMERICA'S FUTUREgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue ×334 · 100% of their budget
- BGBURNING GLASS INSTITUTEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +357%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The national foundation for american policy is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to public policy research on trade, immigration, and other issues of national importance. the organization seeks to expand the debate over the…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…
Competitive enterprise institute (cei) is a non-profit public policy organization dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government. we believe that consumers are best helped not by government regulation but by being…
To provide information about public policy and national policy alternatives to leaders in business, government, religion, and academia.
The National Academy of Public Administration is an independent, 501(c)(3) nonprofit, non partisan Organization established in 1967 and chartered by Congress in 1984. See Schedule O
The mission of the d.c. policy center is to arm decision makers with fact-based, unbiased, and reliable research and analyses to help create a vibrant local economy that can maximize opportunities for residents, workers, and businesses in…
The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…
A national non partisan public policy forum to illuminate issues of public policy.
The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…
The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.
Ncapec is the only u.s. business association focused exclusively on facilitating american private sector input to the apec process. programs typically feature discussions between business, government and academia on key trade and economic…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Action Forum Inc and the most unlike its peers is The National Museum of Women in the Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds American Action Network Inc ↗
- Who funds FARMERS FOR FREE TRADE ↗
- Who funds TAX FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION ↗
- Who funds TRADE BENEFITS AMERICA COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE ACTION ↗
- Who funds National Association of Wholesaler- Distributors Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ADVERTISING COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Americans for Tax Reform ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES ↗
- Who funds BUILDING AMERICA'S FUTURE ↗
- Who funds Center for a New American Security Inc ↗
- Who funds BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds THIRD WAY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACTION FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FORWARD ↗
- Who funds FAITH AND POLITICS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Ripon Society Inc ↗
- Who funds ACCELERATOR FOR AMERICA ACTION ↗
- Who funds REPUBLICAN MAIN STREET PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds THE CONGRESSIONAL INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Washington Intl Trade Foundation ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GOVERNING MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds SENATE WORKING GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ↗
- Who funds Conservative Climate Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds The Third Way Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BURNING GLASS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE SOLUTIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds HORTON'S KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY AND TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds AMAC-ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds REPUBLICAN GOVERNORS PUBLIC POLICY COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR INNOVATIVE POLICY ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds SHRM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Edison Electric Institute Inc · Ncta - the Internet & Television Association · Democracy Fund Inc · AARP · Consumer Technology Association · Motion Picture Association Inc · Ctia - the Wireless Association · American Petroleum Institute · Biotechnology Innovation Organization · Nuclear Energy Institute Inc · Association of American Railroads
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Business Roundtable Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jobs for the Future Inc — 11% of income from government
- Amac-Action Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.