· Public charity
American Association of University Women Inc
Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 28 grants below total $639,971 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,923,964 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,283,993 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $245k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $379k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CORREIA & PUTH PLLC | $119,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION | $115,000 |
| TB ROBINSON LAW GROUP PLLC | $84,990 |
| UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO SCHOOL OF LAW | $60,000 |
| THE FIERBERG NATIONAL LAW GROUP PLLC | $25,000 |
| BHAVLEEN SABHARWAL | $20,000 |
| BROWN GIRLS READ | $10,000 |
| DEMOCRASHE | $10,000 |
| ADVOCATES FOR WOMEN'S AND KIDS' EQUALITY (AWAKE) TN | $10,000 |
| HISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC | $10,000 |
| GIRLS INC OF THE CENTRAL COAST | $10,000 |
| YOUTH OUTREACH IN SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING AND MATH | $10,000 |
| ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT SOLUTIONS | $10,000 |
| LUNA COMPOSITION LAB | $10,000 |
| WOMEN IN BIO | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $189k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $1.3M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIPS · INTERNATIONAL PROJECT GRANTS (IPG)
Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIPS · NYC FUND
Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIPS · NYC FUND
Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIPS · INTERNATIONAL PROJECT GRANTS (IPG) · NYC FUND
Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIPS · NYC FUND
Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIPS
Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIPS
Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIPS · INTERNATIONAL PROJECT GRANTS (IPG)
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $315k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York3× · 2022–2025 · $145k · revenue +36%
- HUHISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC2× · 2019–2025 · $20k · revenue +60%
- CGCODE GIRLS UNITED2× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +391%
Funded once
- NINEWSEUM INCone grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -99%
- FMFAFINSKI MARK & JOHNSON PAone grant, 2020 · $61k
- BEBAILEY & EHRENBERG PLLCone grant, 2018 · $39k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Girls inc.'s mission is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. in partnership with schools and community organizations, we focus on the development of the whole girl. she learns to value herself, take risks, and discover and…
Female strong is a 501c3 non-profit organization and a community of committed individuals that offer hands-on programs, mentorship, and experiences that build confidence in middle and high school girls. we support the inclusion of all…
Our mission is to challenge and nurture young women to thrive in future global markets through personalized STEM advanced academics. Through a supportive small school and single-gender environment, project-based learning, and STEM advanced…
Girls inc. inspires all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. our comprehensive approach to whole girl development equips girls to nagivate gender, economic, and social barriers and grow up healthy, educated, and independent.
To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.
Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.
The mission of girls inc. of new york city is to advocate for and improve the lives of underserved girls and youth, ages 6 to 21+, in the five boroughs. we pursue this mission by providing research-based educational programs in the areas…
To inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold.
Digital Girl, Inc. (DGI) is a non-profit organization dedicated to empowering the underserved youth of New York City, especially young girls, to pursue studies and careers in STEM ( Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) disciplines.
Girls inc. of chattanooga inspires and equips girls to be strong, smart and bold leaders within their families, their communities and society.
The mission of Girls Incorporated of Greater Houston is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart and bold.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Science Club for Girls Inc and the most unlike its peers is Grit Glam and Guts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
186 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 186 of the 244 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEWSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds American Association of University Women Special Projects Fund ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S LAW PROJECT ↗
- Who funds COSMETIC EXECUTIVE WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC COUNSEL ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds CODE GIRLS UNITED ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds ARTS BRIDGING THE GAP ↗
- Who funds GENAUSTIN ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S HALL OF FAME INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLSTART ↗
- Who funds YWCA Metropolitan Phoenix ↗
- Who funds THE LONG ISLAND DOULA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds LATINITAS INC ↗
- Who funds MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: YWCA USA Inc · Girls Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Honda USA Foundation · Glenn W Bailey Charitable Trust · Flourish Arbonne Foundation · National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance Inc · Pwc Foundation Inc · The Aspen Institute Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Girl Scouts of the United States of America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Association of University Women Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Ophelia's Place — 22% of income from government
- Girl Power Rocks Inc — 22% of income from government
- Goodwin University Inc — 14% of income from government
- Operation New Hope Inc — 13% of income from government
- University of Central Florida Research Foundation Inc — 10% of income from government
- Ywca Hartford Region Inc — 7% of income from government
- The University of Bridgeport Inc — 3% of income from government
- Bay Path University — 3% of income from government
- Girls Incorporated of Worcester — 2% of income from government
- Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc — 2% of income from government
- Pace Center for Girlsinc — 2% of income from government
- Hispanic Unity of Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
- Barry University Inc — 1% of income from government
- Our Sisters School — 0% of income from government
- Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.