Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Girl Scouts of the United States of America

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence, and character.

$8.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
107
Grants FY2025still arriving
49
States reached
$4.4M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Youth Development$57MHuman Services$1.4MEnvironment$263kPublic Benefit$106kEducation$101k
02FY2025 · 107 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 107 grants below total $8,159,612 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $8,882,298 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $722,686 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $104k
  • $10k–50k69 grants · $1.6M
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+2 grants · $4.8M
$22,742
Median grant
49
States reached
$307M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GS OF CENTRAL INDIANA$4,358,556
GS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$462,857
GS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS$134,191
GS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA$127,076
GS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN$102,636
GS OF WEST CENTRAL FLORIDA$90,348
GS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON$82,351
GS OF THE NATIONS CAPITAL$78,306
GS OF HAWAII$75,254
GS OF OREGON & SW WASHINGTON INC$72,995
GS HEART OF THE HUDSON$72,037
GS OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY$69,518
GS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS$69,322
GS OF COLORADO$65,337
GS OF GREATER LOS ANGELES$63,792
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GS of Eastern Massachusetts: $250k → 16%GS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $218k → 7%GS Heart of Pennsylvania: $189k → 12%GS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $463k → 10%Greater NY Girl Scout Council: $174k → 17%GS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS: $285k → 5%Girl Scouts of San Jacinto Council: $195k → 16%Nations Capital GS Council: $267k → 14%GS OF CONNECTICUT: $190k → 11%GS HORNETS NEST COUNCIL: $150k → 10%GS OF GREATER ATLANTA: $212k → 8%GS OF COLORADO: $590k → 12%GS OF CENTRAL INDIANA: $4.4M → 16%GS of Western Ohio: $235k → 16%GS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $197k → 9%Greater Chicago and Northwest Indiana: $255k → 8%GS OF GREATER CHICAGO AND NORTHWEST INDIANA: $273k → 14%GS HEART OF NEW JERSEY: $281k → 5%GS OF LOUISIANA EAST: $378k → 15%Girl Scouts of Central Maryland: $167k → 19%GS of Eastern Massachusetts: $202k → 16%GS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $183k → 7%GS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $237k → 10%GS Council of Greater New York: $165k → 17%Girl Scouts of Northeast Texas: $187k → 5%GS OF THE NATIONS CAPITAL: $193k → 14%GS OF CONNECTICUT: $164k → 11%GS of Greater Atlanta: $191k → 8%GS OF COLORADO: $206k → 12%GS OF CENTRAL INDIANA: $4.2M → 16%GS OF WESTERN OHIO: $172k → 16%GS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $153k → 9%GS OF GREATER CHICAGO AND NORTHWEST INDIANA: $254k → 8%GS HEART OF NEW JERSEY: $152k → 5%GS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS: $175k → 16%GS of Eastern Pennsylvania: $171k → 7%GS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $224k → 10%GS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS: $161k → 5%GS OF THE NATIONS CAPITAL: $181k → 14%GS OF Gateway: $445k → 14%GS OF GREATER ATLANTA: $160k → 8%GS OF CENTRAL INDIANA: $2.8M → 16%GS of Greater Chicago and Northwest Indiana: $150k → 8%GS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $155k → 7%GS of Northern California: $164k → 10%GS OF CENTRAL INDIANA: $160k → 16%GS of Greater Los Angeles: $315k → 14%GS of Greater Los Angeles: $154k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$59M · 111 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

111 repeat relationships — 105 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

111
1

Total granted

$59M
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

94%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $12M · revenue +10% · 39% of their budget
  • GS
    Girl Scouts of Greater Chicago and Northwest Indiana
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +13%
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF COLORADO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • FN
    FARTHEST NORTH GIRL SCOUT COUNCIL
    one grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Girl Scout Council of the Southern Appalachians Inc

To provide direct services to the community for the advancement and development of girls and young women.

Youth Development
2
Girl Scouts of Mn and Wi River Valleys Inc

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place. girl scouts river valleys' purpose is to boldly lead as an antiracist organization that uplifts and empowers every girl to know their…

Youth Development
3
Girl Scouts of Orange County

Girl scouts builds girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
4
Girl Scouts of Southeastern Michigan

Girl scouts builds girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
5
Girl Scouts of the United States of America

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence, and character.

Youth Development
6
Girl Scouts of Central California South Inc

Girl Scouts of Central California South, Inc. is the largest girl leadership development organization in the Central Valley. Our mission is to build girls of courage, confidence, and character who make the world a better place.

—
7
Girl Scouts of Northern Indiana Michiana Inc

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
8
Girl Scouts of Central and Western Massachusetts Inc

Provide leadership development programming for girls, ages 5-17, throughout central and western massachusetts.

—
9
Girl Scouts of Northern New Jersey

Girl scouts of northern new jersey provides leadership opportunities for girls ages 5-18 with a mission to build girls of courage, confidence, and character, to make the world a better place. these leadership opportunities allow girls to…

Unclassified
10
Boy Scouts of America Natl Council 101 Northeast Georgia Council

The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by scouting of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of scouting of america, the…

Youth Development
11
Girls in Stem
Human Services
12
Department of Tn American Legion Auxiliary Volunteer Girl State

We empower Tennessee's promising young women to become and remain civically engaged leaders through experiential learning and relevant, inspiring growth opportunities.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girl Scouts of Ne Kansas and Nw Missouri Inc and the most unlike its peers is Teton Science Schools Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 67 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%2%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%87%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%4%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%85%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%1/112
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,453

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

106 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 106 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
105/106
Grantees still filing
64/106
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC — $11,835,985 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC+77 more — $37,116,517 · Youth Development+77 moreYOUNG MEN'S INSTITUTE LIBRARY — $747,001 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S INSTIT…Girl Scouts of West Central Florida Inc — $722,515 · OtherGirl Scouts of Wes…GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS INC — $510,439 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF EAS…GS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $464,490 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC — $444,209 · OtherGirl Scouts of Historic Georgia Inc — $405,440 · OtherGS OF CENTRAL & WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS — $403,154 · OtherGirl Scouts of Citrus Council Inc — $350,589 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS - DIAMONDS OF ARKANSAS OKLAHOMA & TEXAS — $337,903 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF NYPENN PATHWAYS INC — $329,687 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF KENTUCKIANA INC — $320,213 · Other+22 more — $4,534,016 · Other+22 moreTETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS INC — $74,463 · Environment
Youth Development$48,952,502Other$9,569,656Environment$74,463

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC — $11,835,985 over 8y, 39% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $1,519,773 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetGirl Scouts of Greater Chicago and Northwest Indiana — $1,323,088 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF COLORADO — $1,266,951 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $1,232,605 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS — $1,225,474 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetGirl Scout Council of the Nation's Capital — $1,213,337 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC — $1,084,351 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetGirl Scouts of Greater Atlanta Inc — $1,080,894 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $1,078,615 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN NJ — $1,047,591 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetGirl Scouts of Western Ohio — $945,246 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetGirl Scouts of Greater NY Inc — $906,189 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetGirl Scouts of Gateway Council Inc — $849,602 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF NEW JERSEY — $820,143 over 9y, 4.5% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S INSTITUTE LIBRARY — $747,001 over 9y, 79% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON — $744,645 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetGirl Scouts of West Central Florida Inc — $722,515 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF THE HUDSON INC — $709,047 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS - ARIZONA CACTUS-PINE COUNCIL INC — $706,996 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetGirl Scouts of San Jacinto Council — $696,302 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN LAKES AND PINES COUNCIL — $692,880 over 9y, 4.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH EAST OHIO — $655,399 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetCARIBE GIRL SCOUTS COUNCIL INC — $647,519 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC — $641,857 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA — $564,336 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $526,553 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE GIRL SCOUTS' TRUST — $523,133 over 9y, 26% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS INC — $510,439 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA PLAINS INC — $503,809 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS — $493,983 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF WISCONSIN SOUTHEAST INC — $480,736 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE GREEN AND WHITE MTNS — $472,342 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS LOUISIANA EAST INC — $468,151 over 6y, 9.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC — $464,460 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNCIL INC — $458,675 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC — $444,209 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CALIFORNIA'S CENTRAL COAST — $412,966 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS CAROLINAS PEAKS TO PIEDMONT INC — $410,193 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS - NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL PINES INC — $407,823 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetGirl Scouts of Historic Georgia Inc — $405,440 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS — $393,381 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA — $381,481 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF OHIO'S HEARTLAND COUNCIL INC — $366,725 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INC — $365,523 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF OREGON & SW WASHINGTON INC — $353,543 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetGirl Scouts of Citrus Council Inc — $350,589 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS - DIAMONDS OF ARKANSAS OKLAHOMA & TEXAS — $337,903 over 9y, 1.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of Greater Chicago and Northwest Indiana ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scout Council of the Nation's Capital ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of Greater Atlanta Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN NJ ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of Western Ohio ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of Greater NY Inc ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of Gateway Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS HEART OF NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S INSTITUTE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of West Central Florida Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS HEART OF THE HUDSON INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS - ARIZONA CACTUS-PINE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of San Jacinto Council ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN LAKES AND PINES COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH EAST OHIO ↗
  • Who funds CARIBE GIRL SCOUTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GIRL SCOUTS' TRUST ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA PLAINS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF WISCONSIN SOUTHEAST INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE GREEN AND WHITE MTNS ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS LOUISIANA EAST INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CALIFORNIA'S CENTRAL COAST ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS CAROLINAS PEAKS TO PIEDMONT INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Illumina Corporate Fo…Aetna Foundation IncPublix Super Markets …Pwc Foundation IncCvs FoundationEaston Sports Develop…Morgan Stanley Founda…Union Pacific Foundat…Wounded Warriors Fami…Verizon FoundationCharities Aid Foundat…American Water Charit…
Illumina Corporate FoundationDE35.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Illumina Corporate Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Pwc Foundation Inc · Cvs Foundation · Easton Sports Development Foundation II · Morgan Stanley Foundation Inc · Union Pacific Foundation · Wounded Warriors Family Support Inc · Verizon Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Water Charitable Foundationinc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Girl Scouts of the United States of America funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Young Men's Institute Library — 21% of income from government
  • Girl Scout Council of Tropical Florida Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Girl Scouts of Oregon & Sw Washington Inc — 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
46report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 112 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home