Skip to content
American Association of University Women Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

American Association of University Women Inc

Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.

$5.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$119k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$1.6MEducation$568kYouth Development$483kCommunity Improvement$305kArts & Culture$244kHuman Services$190kCivil Rights$61kScience & Tech$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 28 grants below total $639,971, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,923,964 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,283,993 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $245k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $379k
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$167M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORREIA & PUTH PLLC$119,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION$115,000
TB ROBINSON LAW GROUP PLLC$84,990
UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO SCHOOL OF LAW$60,000
THE FIERBERG NATIONAL LAW GROUP PLLC$25,000
BHAVLEEN SABHARWAL$20,000
HISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC$10,000
COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY$10,000
GIRL POWER ROCKS INC$10,000
LUNA COMPOSITION LAB$10,000
WOMEN IN BIO$10,000
YOUTH OUTREACH IN SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING AND MATH$10,000
ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT SOLUTIONS$10,000
GIRLS INC OF THE CENTRAL COAST$10,000
CODE GIRLS UNITED$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $189k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%IMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INSTITUTE INC: $10k → 16%YWCA MISSOULA: $7k → 9%YWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $9k → 7%STRONG WOMEN STRONG GIRLS: $10k → 11%BRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH: $10k → 11%YWCA OF CORTLAND: $5k → 15%GLOBAL IMPACT INITIATIVE: $10k → 10%RESOURCES INSPIRING SUCCESS AND EMPOWERING (RISE): $10k → 11%FIRST IN TEXAS: $10k → 16%REPURPOSE SAVANNAH: $10k → 16%JUVENILE JUSTICE COALITION: $5k → 15%LIBERA INC: $10k → 19%YWCA MCLEAN COUNTY: $7k → 11%PUERTO RICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC: $10k → 8%OASIS-A HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $7k → 12%OPERATION RESTORATION: $10k → 23%NEW SUN RISING: $7k → 11%THE FOUNDRYNET POSITIVE INC: $8k → 13%TREASURE COAST GIRLS COALITION INC: $8k → 12%HEART WOMEN & GIRLS: $6k → 14%YWCA GREATER PITTSBURGH: $7k → 11%YWCA PASADENA-FOOTHILL VALLEY: $7k → 14%YWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $1.3M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$420k · 31% · 19 people

Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIPS · INTERNATIONAL PROJECT GRANTS (IPG)

Middle East and North Africa$255k · 19% · 10 people

Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIPS · NYC FUND

South America$225k · 17% · 10 people

Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIPS · NYC FUND

South Asia$200k · 15% · 10 people

Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIPS · INTERNATIONAL PROJECT GRANTS (IPG) · NYC FUND

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$120k · 9% · 4 people

Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIPS · NYC FUND

East Asia and the Pacific$45k · 3% · 2 people

Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIPS

North America (Canada and Mexico)$40k · 3% · 2 people

Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIPS

Central America and the Caribbean$30k · 2% · 2 people

Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIPS · INTERNATIONAL PROJECT GRANTS (IPG)

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 18 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
205

Total granted

$1.4M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+19%

Still filing today

50%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $315k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    The Research Foundation for The State University of New York
    3× · 2022–2025 · $145k · revenue +36%
  • HU
    HISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC
    2× · 2019–2025 · $20k · revenue +60%
  • CG
    CODE GIRLS UNITED
    2× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +391%

Funded once

  • NI
    NEWSEUM INC
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -99%
  • FM
    FAFINSKI MARK & JOHNSON PA
    one grant, 2020 · $61k
  • BE
    BAILEY & EHRENBERG PLLC
    one grant, 2018 · $39k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Girls in Stem
Human Services
2
Girls Incorporated of Greater Indianapolis

Girls inc.'s mission is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. in partnership with schools and community organizations, we focus on the development of the whole girl. she learns to value herself, take risks, and discover and…

Youth Development
3
Female Strong

Female strong is a 501c3 non-profit organization and a community of committed individuals that offer hands-on programs, mentorship, and experiences that build confidence in middle and high school girls. we support the inclusion of all…

Community Improvement
4
The School for Global Thinkers

Our mission is to challenge and nurture young women to thrive in future global markets through personalized STEM advanced academics. Through a supportive small school and single-gender environment, project-based learning, and STEM advanced…

Education
5
Girls Incorporated of San Diego County

Girls inc. inspires all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. our comprehensive approach to whole girl development equips girls to nagivate gender, economic, and social barriers and grow up healthy, educated, and independent.

—
6
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

—
7
Girl Scouts of Utah

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
8
Girls Incorporated of New York City

The mission of girls inc. of new york city is to advocate for and improve the lives of underserved girls and youth, ages 6 to 21+, in the five boroughs. we pursue this mission by providing research-based educational programs in the areas…

Civil Rights
9
Girls Incorporated of Metro Denver

To inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold.

Youth Development
10
Girls Inc of Chattanooga

Girls inc. of chattanooga inspires and equips girls to be strong, smart and bold leaders within their families, their communities and society.

Youth Development
11
Digital Girl Incorporated

Digital Girl, Inc. (DGI) is a non-profit organization dedicated to empowering the underserved youth of New York City, especially young girls, to pursue studies and careers in STEM ( Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) disciplines.

Education
12
Girls Incorporated of Greater Houston

The mission of Girls Incorporated of Greater Houston is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart and bold.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girl Scouts Heart of New Jersey; the most unlike its peers is Grit Glam and Guts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

186 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 186 of the 244 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
43
Early backer (in before they grew)
179/186
Grantees still filing
121/186
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CORREIA & PUTH PLLC: $296,932 · OtherCORREIA & PUTH PLLCTB ROBINSON LAW GROUP PLLC: $220,990 · OtherTB ROBINSON LAW GROUP PLLCFAFINSKI MARK & JOHNSON PA: $165,151 · OtherFAFINSKI MARK & JOHNSON PATHE FIERBERG NATIONAL LAW GROUP PLLC: $105,000 · OtherNEWSEUM INC: $100,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE: $90,000 · OtherKATZ MARSHALL AND BANKS: $82,325 · Other+87 more: $1,116,857 · Other+87 moreThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $145,000 · EducationThe Research Foundati…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $115,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFOR…American Association of University Women Special Projects Fund: $58,554 · EducationAmerican Association …+39 more: $354,417 · Education+39 moreCODE GIRLS UNITED: $18,541 · Youth DevelopmentWOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR AND SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ARE POWERFUL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentJohnston County Stem Girls Initiative Corp: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentGRIT GLAM AND GUTS: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentLEAD Girls of NC Inc: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirls Incorporated of the Central Coast: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentLATINITAS INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCODEART INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentOPHELIA'S PLACE: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe GEMS Camp: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentPURSUIT OF INNOVATION: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentSHIELD MENTOR PROGRAM: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIRST NORTH CAROLINA: $9,000 · Youth DevelopmentCARTER EDUCATION & COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $8,500 · Youth DevelopmentTECH GIRL POWER INC: $8,300 · Youth Development+8 more: $56,000 · Youth DevelopmentGENAUSTIN: $15,000 · Human ServicesLibera Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesBRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH: $10,000 · Human ServicesPuerto Rican Association For Human Development Incorporated: $10,000 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN ORGANIZATION ON ADOLESCENT SEXUAL HEALTH: $10,000 · Human ServicesFoundation for Inspiration & Recognition of Scienc: $10,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION RESTORATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesREPURPOSE SAVANNAH INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS INC OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $10,000 · Human ServicesIMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesGLOBAL IMPACT INITIATIVE: $9,800 · Human ServicesRESOURCES INSPIRING SUCCESS AND EMPOWERING: $9,625 · Human ServicesYWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $9,085 · Human ServicesNet Positive Inc: $8,000 · Human ServicesTREASURE COAST GIRLS COALITIONINC: $7,530 · Human ServicesYWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS: $7,000 · Human ServicesOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesNEW SUN RISING: $7,000 · Human ServicesPASADENA - FOOTHILL VALLEY YWCA: $7,000 · Human ServicesYWCA MISSOULA: $7,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION GREATER PITTSBURGH: $7,000 · Human ServicesARTS BRIDGING THE GAP: $17,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL WOMEN'S HALL OF FAME INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureHANA ARTS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureLUNA COMPOSITION LAB INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSTEM FROM DANCE INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTULSA AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC: $9,656 · Arts & CultureSYNCHRONICITY PERFORMANCE GROUP: $7,000 · Arts & CultureGLOBAL GIRL MEDIA: $7,000 · Arts & CultureLANCASTER SCIENCE CENTER: $7,000 · Arts & CultureWOMEN'S LAW PROJECT: $30,793 · Civil RightsLAAL NYC: $10,000 · Civil RightsBRAVE HOUSE INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsMAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 · HealthTHE LONG ISLAND DOULA ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · HealthBIOBUS INC: $10,000 · HealthFULL STEAM FORWARD INC: $10,000 · HealthPublic Health Management Corporation: $7,000 · Health
Other$2,177,255Education$672,971Youth Development$240,341Human Services$191,040Arts & Culture$92,656Civil Rights$50,793Health$47,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $145,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEWSEUM INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Association of University Women Special Projects Fund: $58,554 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetWOMEN'S LAW PROJECT: $30,793 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCOSMETIC EXECUTIVE WOMEN INC: $24,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPUBLIC COUNSEL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCODE GIRLS UNITED: $18,541 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN PHILADELPHIA: $17,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetARTS BRIDGING THE GAP: $17,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetGENAUSTIN: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S HALL OF FAME INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGIRLSTART: $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR AND SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetManhattan University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH OUTREACH IN SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING AND MATH: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTRUCKEE MEADOWS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWOMEN IN BIO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDEMOCRASHE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetHANA ARTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLibera Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGirls With Impact Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLAAL NYC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetJohnston County Stem Girls Initiative Corp: $10,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetLEAD Girls of NC Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPuerto Rican Association For Human Development Incorporated: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCITIZENS FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBRAVE HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE LONG ISLAND DOULA ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSCIENCE AND MATH INVESTIGATIVE LEARNING EXPERIENCES SMILE PROGRAM: $10,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S PREPARATORY NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBay Path University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN ORGANIZATION ON ADOLESCENT SEXUAL HEALTH: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetEastern Washington University Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGirls Incorporated of the Central Coast: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDISABILITY EMPOWHER NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSTEM FROM DANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSHOOTING STARS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetREPURPOSE SAVANNAH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetTECHNOLOGY AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES CLEANTECH INCUBATOR: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEWSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds American Association of University Women Special Projects Fund ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S LAW PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds COSMETIC EXECUTIVE WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC COUNSEL ↗
  • Who funds CODE GIRLS UNITED ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds ARTS BRIDGING THE GAP ↗
  • Who funds GENAUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S HALL OF FAME INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLSTART ↗
  • Who funds YWCA Metropolitan Phoenix ↗
  • Who funds MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR AND SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Manhattan University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

YWCA USA IncGirls IncRockefeller Philanthr…The Nordson Corporati…Honda USA FoundationGlenn W Bailey Charit…Flourish Arbonne Foun…National Collegiate I…Pwc Foundation IncThe Aspen Institute I…Td Charitable Foundat…Girl Scouts of the Un…
YWCA USA IncDC24.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: YWCA USA Inc · Girls Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Honda USA Foundation · Glenn W Bailey Charitable Trust · Flourish Arbonne Foundation · National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance Inc · Pwc Foundation Inc · The Aspen Institute Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Girl Scouts of the United States of America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Association of University Women Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Association of University Women Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Ophelia's Place: 22% of income from government
  • Girl Power Rocks Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Goodwin University Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Operation New Hope Inc: 13% of income from government
  • University of Central Florida Research Foundation Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Ywca Hartford Region Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The University of Bridgeport Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Bay Path University: 3% of income from government
  • Girls Incorporated of Worcester: 2% of income from government
  • Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 2% of income from government
  • Hispanic Unity of Florida Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Barry University Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Our Sisters School: 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
60report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 244 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Association of University Women’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home