· Private foundation
Merancas Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k44 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k83 grants · $7.2M
- $250k+13 grants · $7.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTRAL PIEDMONT COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $1,800,000 |
| ROOF ABOVE | $1,100,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $1,000,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS | $900,000 |
| YWCA CENTRAL CAROLINAS | $625,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC | $500,000 |
| FREEDOM SCHOOL PARTNERS | $400,000 |
| CRISIS ASSISTANCE MINISTRY | $250,000 |
| CHARLOTTE CENTER FOR LEGAL ADVOCACY | $250,000 |
| THOMPSON CHILD AND FAMILY FOCUS | $250,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE CHARLOT | $250,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $250,000 |
| NOURISH UP | $250,000 |
| FAMILIES FORWARD CHARLOTTE | $200,000 |
| HOMEFRONT | $200,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $19.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.
201 repeat relationships — 130 still active in FY2025, 71 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $493k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Crisis Assistance Ministry9× · 2017–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +27%
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC9× · 2017–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +70%
ROOF ABOVE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +58%
Funded once
- C(CRITTENTON (FORMERLY FLORENCE CRITTone grant, 2023 · $300k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $200k
- TCThe Center for Community Transitionsone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.
NourishNC, Inc.'s goal is to provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community
To unite the Church to transform the city through the power of the Gospel.
Carolina Human Reinvestment mission is to "Identify and serve the need of the youth and their families in our community "
Guided by God, Habitat Cabarrus transforms lives and our community by uniting all of Cabarrus County around the cause of decent, affordable housing for everyone.
The mission of Communities In Schools is to surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.
Recruit and train and license foster parents to receive foster children from county government agencies.
CTS Community Development is a behavioral health provider committed to helping individuals from underserved communities to live safe, productive, and meaningful lives
Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST
The Arc of North Carolina is committed to securing for all people with intellectual and developmental disabilities the opportunity to choose and realize their goals of where and how they learn, live, work, and play.
The mission of The Charlotte Center is to help our community flourish. We accomplish our mission by bringing people together to explore community life together through the lens of the humanities and civic imagination.
Raleigh county community action association, inc. empowers individuals and families to reach their highest levels of social and economical self-sufficiency, while identifying and eliminating causes of poverty. rccaa provides direct…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our House Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Steve Smith Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 20% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
167 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 167 of the 229 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Crisis Assistance Ministry ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC ↗
- Who funds ROOF ABOVE INC ↗
- Who funds Young Womens Christian Association of the Central Carolinas Inc ↗
- Who funds THOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS INC ↗
- Who funds Charlotte Family Housing ↗
- Who funds THE RELATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS ↗
- Who funds Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc ↗
- Who funds Freedom School Partners Inc ↗
- Who funds Council for Childrens Rights Inc ↗
- Who funds HOMEFRONT INC ↗
- Who funds Community Link Programs of Travelers Aid Society of Central Carolinas Inc ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Charmeck Family Justice Center Inc co Safe Alliance ↗
- Who funds OPEN HAND ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds Hope Haven Inc ↗
- Who funds Ada Jenkins Families and Careers Development Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Pats Place Child Advocacy Center ↗
- Who funds ALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Union County Community Shelter ↗
- Who funds Care Ring Inc ↗
- Who funds KIPP CHARLOTTE INC ↗
- Who funds MedAssist of Mecklenburg DBA NC Medassist ↗
- Who funds Nourish Up ↗
- Who funds The ROC Charlotte Inc ↗
- Who funds ARM IN ARM INC ↗
- Who funds Safe Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds Supportive Housing Communities Inc ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds WOMANSPACE INC ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON INC ↗
- Who funds Charlotte Center for Legal Advocacy Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Presbyterian Hospital · Ally Charitable Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Albemarle Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Womens Impact Fund · Truist Foundation Inc · Speedway Children's Charities · Philip L Van Every Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Merancas Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mount Carmel Guild of Trenton Nj — 100% of income from government
- Womanspace Inc — 47% of income from government
- Anchor House Inc — 45% of income from government
- Prevention Education Inc — 39% of income from government
- Trenton Health Team Inc — 31% of income from government
- Literacy New Jersey Inc — 28% of income from government
- Isles Inc — 21% of income from government
- Homefront Inc — 9% of income from government
- Rescue Mission of Trenton New Jersey — 8% of income from government
- Citizen Schools Inc — 8% of income from government
- HomeWorks Trenton — 6% of income from government
- Arm in Arm Inc — 4% of income from government
- Community Loan Fund of New Jersey Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.