Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Mac AIDS Fund

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$12M
Granted FY2020
1
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$12M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.

Health$28MPhilanthropy$8.7MFood & Nutrition$3.3MInternational$2.6MHousing & Shelter$2.4MCivil Rights$1.3MEducation$1.1MCrime & Legal$955kOther$0
02FY2020 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$11,733,389
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
the estee lauder com charitable fdn$11,733,389
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%St Boniface Haiti Foundation: $60k → 8%Southeast Texas Food Bank: $40k → 19%New Mexico AIDS Services Inc: $25k → 14%Hands On Hartford: $30k → 11%The Center in Asbury Park: $41k → 6%Open Arms of Minnesota: $60k → 11%New Mexico AIDS Services Inc: $21k → 14%Hands On Hartford: $25k → 11%The Center in Asbury Park: $38k → 6%St Boniface Haiti Foundation: $75k → 8%Open Arms of Minnesota: $45k → 11%Hands On Hartford: $15k → 11%St Boniface Haiti Foundation: $60k → 8%Open Arms of Minnesota: $40k → 11%Albany Damien Center: $23k → 14%Friends For Life Corporation: $15k → 17%The Damien Center: $30k → 16%St James Social Service Corporation: $20k → 16%Albany Damien Center Inc: $15k → 14%Broward House Inc: $15k → 13%The Damien Center: $25k → 16%The Damien Center: $15k → 16%Clare Housing: $70k → 11%The Young Center for Immigrant Children's Rights: $50k → 14%Clare Housing: $50k → 11%Clare Housing: $40k → 11%Community Servings: $50k → 16%Larkin Street Youth Services: $70k → 10%Community Servings: $45k → 16%Larkin Street Youth Services: $50k → 10%Community Servings: $37k → 16%Larkin Street Youth Services: $40k → 10%Safe Horizon Inc: $50k → 17%Safe Horizon Inc: $25k → 17%Your Mom Cares LLC: $25k → 14%Safe Horizon Inc: $25k → 17%Heartland Human Care Services: $30k → 14%Heartland Human Care Services: $25k → 14%Heartland Human Care Services: $15k → 14%Institute for Public Health Innovation: $75k → 14%Institute for Public Health Innovation: $50k → 14%HIPS: $100k → 14%HIPS: $50k → 14%HIPS: $25k → 14%The Tyler Clementi Foundation Inc: $25k → 17%Hetrick-Martin Institute Inc: $125k → 17%Hetrick-Martin Institute Inc: $50k → 17%Hetrick-Martin Institute Inc: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$26M · 223 repeat orgs$18M to everyone else

223 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2020, 223 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

223
116

Total granted

$26M
$6.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+71%

Still filing today

83%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $809k · revenue +226%
  • BC
    BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $725k · revenue +25%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $600k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • TE
    THE ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M · revenue +85%
  • FF
    FUND FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN NEW YORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500k · revenue +57%
  • JS
    Joan & Sandy Weill Medical College of Cornell UNI
    one grant, 2019 · $400k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Philadelphia Center

Hiv/aids counseling/assistance

—
2
Harlem United Community Aids Center Inc

Harlem united provides healthcare, supportive housing and prevention services to persons living with or at risk for aids or hiv related illnesses and other chronic conditions.

Health
3
Aids Community Resources Inc D/B/a Acr Health

Aids community resources, inc. d/b/a acr health, is a community-based organization providing prevention, education, and support services to people with chronic illnesses, including hiv/aids, and those at risk for contracting hiv, stds, and…

Education
4
Tpa Network Incorporated

Vision: vivent health envisions an end to the hiv/aids epidemic.mission: to end hiv/aids by providing integratred, personalzied, judgment-free healthcare, social services, and effective prevention strategies.

—
5
Alianza of New Mexico

Alianza's mission is to empower hard-to-reach, vulnerable, and underserved populations through education and supportive services aimed at working with everyone we serve to achieve better outcomes and higher quality of life.

Human Services
6
Aids Interfaith Network Inc

Aids Interfaith Network, Inc. AIN works to prevent the spread of HIV, and serves persons living with HIV and other vulnerable populations.

Health
7
Community Access National Network Cann

To define, promote, and improve access to healthcare services and supports for people living with HIV/AIDS and/or viral hepatitis through advocacy, education, and networking. These services must be affordable to the people who need them…

Health
8
Hiv Alliance

Supporting individuals living with hiv/aids and preventing new hiv infections.

—
9
The Hiv and Hepatitis Policy Institute

The hiv+hepatitis policy institute promotes quality and affordable healthcare for people living with or at risk of hiv, hepatitis, and other serious and chronic health conditions. monitors policies that impact the prevention and treatment…

Health
10
African American Aids Policy and Training Institute

The organization's primary mission is to stop the aids epidemic in black communities by engaging and mobilizing black institutions and individuals in efforts to confront hiv.

Health
11
Health Services Center Inc

The health services center (hsc), inc. is committed to the provision of quality, comprehensive hiv/aids services to all hiv infected, and affected, persons in our service area.

Health
12
Aidsnet Inc

Aidsnet builds healthier communities by planning and funding hiv/aids care and prevention services. aidsnet contracts with agencies in the 6 pa counties of berks, carbon, lehigh, monroe, northampton & schuykill

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aids Council of Northeastern New York and the most unlike its peers is The Estee Lauder Companies Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Pantries & AssistancePregnancy Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Lgbtq+ Community CentersSenior Support ServicesDomestic Violence Crisis Se…United Way FederationsLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Hospice Care ServicesGovernment Accountability R…Environmental Advocacy Orga…Child and Family ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…Community Arts OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%48%35–55yr16%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%34%20–35yr13%54%35–55yr16%6%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%4/268
the rest of the field
13%
240,392/1,819,297

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

264 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 264 of the 344 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
80
Early backer (in before they grew)
250/264
Grantees still filing
223/264
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

the estee lauder com charitable fdn — $11,733,389 · Otherthe estee lauder com charitable fdn+90 more — $12,804,189 · Other+90 moreTIDES FOUNDATION — $6,877,108 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATIONTHE ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ESTEE LAUDER COM…WASHINGTON REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GRANTMAKERS — $750,000 · PhilanthropyWASHINGTON REGIONAL …+2 more — $175,000 · PhilanthropyPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $600,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD F…FUND FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN NEW YORK INC — $500,000 · HealthFUND FOR PUBLIC HEAL…ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC — $475,000 · HealthELTON JOHN AIDS FOUN…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $435,000 · HealthAIDS Foundation of Chicago — $386,154 · HealthPROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $344,000 · HealthNATIONAL HARM REDUCTION COALITION — $300,000 · HealthDRUG POLICY ALLIANCE — $300,000 · Health+55 more — $5,174,156 · Health+55 moreBills Kitchen Inc — $251,000 · Human ServicesTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC — $225,000 · Human ServicesST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION INC — $195,000 · Human ServicesHIPS — $175,000 · Human ServicesCLARE HOUSING — $160,000 · Human ServicesLarkin Street Youth Services — $160,000 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA — $145,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC — $132,000 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION — $125,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HORIZON INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER IN ASBURY PARK INC — $79,177 · Human Services+6 more — $368,000 · Human ServicesGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $809,000 · Food & NutritionProject Open Hand — $287,761 · Food & NutritionMAMA'S KITCHEN — $151,000 · Food & NutritionOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC — $99,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD OUTREACH INC — $91,000 · Food & NutritionMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE — $86,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR THOUGHT — $70,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $61,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $54,000 · Food & NutritionPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $385,000 · EducationEmory University — $275,000 · EducationUniversity of Miami — $225,000 · EducationAIDS UNITED — $225,000 · EducationPROTEUS FUND INC — $75,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts College — $75,000 · EducationNew York University — $75,000 · EducationCAMDEN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $55,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · EducationSTATUS HOME INC F/K/A JERUSALEM HOUSE INC — $163,000 · Housing & ShelterNATIONAL AIDS HOUSING COALITION DBA NATIONAL HIV/AIDS HOUSING COALI — $160,000 · Housing & ShelterALI FORNEY CENTER INC — $160,000 · Housing & ShelterCOLLABORATIVE SOLUTIONS INC — $160,000 · Housing & ShelterPETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $155,000 · Housing & ShelterCARACOLE INC — $90,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$24,537,578Philanthropy$8,802,108Health$8,514,310Human Services$2,115,177Food & Nutrition$1,708,761Education$1,440,000Housing & Shelter$888,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $6,877,108 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $809,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetWASHINGTON REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GRANTMAKERS — $750,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC — $725,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $600,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGLAAD INC — $550,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetFUND FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN NEW YORK INC — $500,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC — $475,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetHOUSING WORKS INC — $445,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $435,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAIDS Foundation of Chicago — $386,154 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $385,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INC — $350,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $344,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALTH AND GENDER EQUITY INC — $330,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetNATIONAL HARM REDUCTION COALITION — $300,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN — $300,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetDRUG POLICY ALLIANCE — $300,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetProject Open Hand — $287,761 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER — $287,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEmory University — $275,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION — $266,417 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC — $251,374 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBills Kitchen Inc — $251,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetBAILEY HOUSE INC — $250,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $225,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC — $225,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetAIDS UNITED — $225,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMemphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc — $225,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetHEALTH GLOBAL ACCESS PROJECT INCORPORATED — $225,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION INC — $195,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE HEALTH FOUNDATION OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS INC — $190,414 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetGRANT FOUNDATION INC — $190,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR CIVIC INNOVATION IN — $185,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHIPS — $175,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetApla Health & Wellness — $167,632 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTATUS HOME INC F/K/A JERUSALEM HOUSE INC — $163,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR HOUSING AND HEALING — $161,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA HARM REDUCTION COALITION — $161,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetHIV LAW PROJECT INC — $160,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetNATIONAL AIDS HOUSING COALITION DBA NATIONAL HIV/AIDS HOUSING COALI — $160,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetCLARE HOUSING — $160,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSHELTERING ARMS CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $160,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC — $160,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetProject Inform — $160,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetAIDS LEGAL REFERRAL PANEL OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA — $160,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetAFRICAN SERVICES COMMITTEE INC — $160,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Estee Lauder Comp…Broadway Caresequity …AIDS UnitedThe Elizabeth Taylor …Elton John AIDS Found…Kent Richard Hofmann …AIDS Healthcare Found…Design Industries Fou…Direct ReliefThe Keith Haring Foun…Drug Policy AllianceEmory University
The Estee Lauder Companies Charitable FoundationNY249.4× affinity125 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Estee Lauder Companies Charitable Foundation · Broadway Caresequity Fights AIDS Inc · AIDS United · The Elizabeth Taylor AIDS Foundation · Elton John AIDS Foundation Inc · Kent Richard Hofmann Foundation In · AIDS Healthcare Foundation · Design Industries Foundation Fighting Aids Inc · Direct Relief · The Keith Haring Foundation Inc · Drug Policy Alliance · Emory University

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mac AIDS Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • The Center in Asbury Park Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Mercy Housing & Shelter Corporation — 77% of income from government
  • Victory Programs Inc — 49% of income from government
  • Inspirica Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Apnha Place to Nourish Your Health — 24% of income from government
  • Hands On Hartford Inc — 20% of income from government
  • Moveable Feast Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Jacksonville Area Sexual Minority Youth Network Inc — 16% of income from government
  • Cascade Aids Project — 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Hyacinth Aids Foundation Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Edge New Jersey Inc — 7% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • Broward House Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Hope and Help Center of Central Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Legal Aid Service of Broward County Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
67report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Mac AIDS Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Mac AIDS Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 344 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home