Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Elizabeth Taylor AIDS Foundation

Etaf was established by elizabeth taylor in 1991 to provide grants to existing organizations for domestic and international programs that offer direct care services to people living with hiv and aids.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
49
Grants FY2025still arriving
21
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$5.5MCivil Rights$606kCrime & Legal$580kEducation$455kHuman Services$341kPublic Benefit$151kHousing & Shelter$120kPublic Safety & Disaster$105kOther$0
02FY2025 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 49 grants below total $1,336,760 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,729,760 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $393,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k41 grants · $826k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $505k
$25,000
Median grant
21
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE$100,000
THE UCLA FOUNDATION$90,000
INDIANA AIDS FUND INC$80,000
EQUALITY MICHIGAN$75,000
SAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION$60,000
SHINE BRIGHT & LIVE$50,000
NORTH CAROLINA AIDS ACTION NETWORK$50,000
AIDS UNITED$40,000
THE SERO PROJECT$32,500
SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC$30,000
PACTA INC$25,010
TASKFORCE PREVENTION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES$25,000
TRANSGENDER ADVOCATES KNOWLEDGEABLE EMPOWERING$25,000
LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION OF CHICAGOLAND$25,000
AVALON HEALING CENTER$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $309k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH SERVICES: $6k → 8%HAWAIIAN ISLANDS HIVAIDS FOUNDATION: $6k → 15%TRANSSOCIAL INC: $25k → 15%KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 33%FRIENDS FOR LIFE CORPORATION: $25k → 17%GAY & LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER SOUTHERN NEVADA: $20k → 13%BALTIMORE SAFE HAVEN: $25k → 19%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $15k → 10%NEW MEXICO AIDS PROJECT: $1k → 14%GAY & LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER FORT LAUDERDALE: $10k → 13%TRANSGENDER ADVOCATES KNOWLEDGEABLE EMPOWERING: $25k → 16%KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY: $8k → 33%REALISTIC EDUCATION IN ACTION COALITION TO FOSTER HEALTH: $8k → 10%LOST-N-FOUND YOUTH: $25k → 13%TRANS SOLUTIONS RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER: $12k → 16%CAMP LAUREL FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%CHRISTIE'S PLACE: $7k → 11%LARKIN ST YOUTH SERVICES: $3k → 10%REACH LA: $15k → 14%REACH LA: $10k → 14%IN THE MEANTIME MEN'S GROUP INC: $10k → 14%IN THE MEANTIME MEN'S GROUP: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $320k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$300k · 94% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: THESE FUNDS ARE RESTRICTED TO THE ELIZABETH TAYLOR MOBILE CLINICS IN MALAWI

North America (Canada and Mexico)$20k · 6% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: THESE FUNDS ARE RESTRICTED TO THE FUNDING OF THE CANADIAN COALITION TO REFORM HIV CRIMINALIZATION'S (CCRHC) 2025 WORK IN MODERNIZING CRIMINAL LAWS AND PENALTIES FOR PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.2M · 52 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

52 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
60

Total granted

$6.2M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+38%

Still filing today

92%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $647k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EQUALITY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE
    5× · 2017–2022 · $2.7M · revenue +122% · 26% of their budget
  • AIDS UNITED
    8× · 2017–2025 · $385k · revenue +11%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $360k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • PD
    PROPPER DALEY LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $186k
  • TR
    THE RABEN GROUP LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $151k
  • CF
    Campaign For Southern Equality
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Philadelphia Center

Hiv/aids counseling/assistance

—
2
Community Access National Network Cann

To define, promote, and improve access to healthcare services and supports for people living with HIV/AIDS and/or viral hepatitis through advocacy, education, and networking. These services must be affordable to the people who need them…

Health
3
Aidsnet Inc

Aidsnet builds healthier communities by planning and funding hiv/aids care and prevention services. aidsnet contracts with agencies in the 6 pa counties of berks, carbon, lehigh, monroe, northampton & schuykill

Health
4
Aids Community Resources Inc D/B/a Acr Health

Aids community resources, inc. d/b/a acr health, is a community-based organization providing prevention, education, and support services to people with chronic illnesses, including hiv/aids, and those at risk for contracting hiv, stds, and…

Education
5
Legacy Community Health Services Inc

The mission of legacy community health services is, "driving healthy change in our communities." our vision is, "connecting our communities to health every day, in every way."

Health
6
Aids Foundation Houston Inc

Allies in hope (aih), formerly known as aids foundation houston, inc. (afh), is a nonprofit corporation founded in 1982 and was among texas' first organizations dedicated to hiv prevention education and services. aih provides stabilizing…

Health
7
Rainbow Health Minnesota

To work for equitable health care access and outcomes for people who experience injustice at the intersection of health status and identity.

Health
8
Apla Health & Wellness

Apla health restores dignity and trust within underserved communities by providing world-class lgbtq+ empowering healthcare, hiv specialty care, food, housing and other essential support services.

Health
9
Aids Project of the East Bay

Aids project of the east bay (apeb) is focused on the prevention of the spread of hiv and supports individuals living with the virus through programs targeted at some of the most vulnerable and marginalized individuals. apeb seeks to…

Health
10
People of Color Against Aids Network

The mission of POCAAN is to work with communities of color and other minority communities to advocate and ensure access to HIV/AIDS education, prevention programs support and health care resources for people of color.

Health
11
Housing Works Inc

Housing works is a vibrant, healing community of people living with and affected by hiv/aids. our mission is to end the dual crises of homelessness and aids through relentless advocacy, the provision of lifesaving services, and…

Community Improvement
12
Southern Tier Aids Program Inc

Stap compassionately and competently meets the evolving needs of its communities by serving people affected by chronic illness and to improve public health through disease prevention, care coordination, and advocacy.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Aids Foundation and the most unlike its peers is P a C T a Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsLgbtq+ Community SupportHealth Access Advocacy and …Christian Missionary Organi…Faith-Based Social ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyAffordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%39%20–35yr11%33%35–55yr13%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%2%<5yr15%7%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr17%56%20–35yr11%22%35–55yr13%7%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%4/154
the rest of the field
14%
26,002/186,824

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

145 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 145 of the 147 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
42
Early backer (in before they grew)
136/145
Grantees still filing
93/145
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EQUALITY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE — $2,705,000 · Public BenefitEQUALITY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTEINDIANA AIDS FUND INC — $321,875 · HealthINDIANA AIDS FUND INCELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC — $275,000 · HealthELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDAT…AIDS LAW PROJECT OF PENNSYLVANIA — $202,500 · HealthAIDS LAW PROJECT OF PEN…SERO PROJECT INC — $97,500 · HealthSERO PROJECT INC+44 more — $775,497 · Health+44 moreSAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION — $360,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATI…PROPPER DALEY LLC — $185,649 · OtherPROPPER DALEY LLCTHE RABEN GROUP LLC — $151,250 · OtherTHE RABEN GROUP LLCREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $140,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIALOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER — $90,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR LOUISIANA — $100,000 · Other+59 more — $970,803 · Other+59 moreAIDS UNITED — $385,000 · EducationAIDS UNIT…UCLA FOUNDATION — $270,000 · EducationUCLA FOUN…TRANS WOMEN IN NEED OF SERVICES INC — $25,000 · Education+3 more — $30,000 · EducationEQUALITY MICHIGAN — $150,000 · Civil RightsEQUALITY FOUNDATION OF GA INC — $142,000 · Civil RightsEquality Ohio Education Fund — $100,000 · Civil RightsCampaign For Southern Equality — $75,000 · Civil RightsLESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER — $25,000 · Civil RightsTHE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY INC — $33,000 · Human ServicesRealistic Education in Action Coalition to Foster Health REACH LA — $33,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS FOR LIFE CORPORATION — $25,000 · Human ServicesBaltimore Safe Haven Corp — $25,000 · Human ServicesMAYFAIRE MEDICAL INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesTransgender Advocates Knowledgeable Empowering — $25,000 · Human ServicesCamp Laurel Foundation — $25,000 · Human ServicesLost-N-Found Youth Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC — $21,000 · Human ServicesGAY & LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA — $20,000 · Human ServicesIN THE MEANTIME MENS GROUP INC — $13,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY RESEARCH & RESOURCE CENT fka TransSolutions Rsrch & Res Ctr — $12,000 · Human ServicesHAWAII ISLAND HIVAIDS FOUNDATION — $11,000 · Human Services+4 more — $21,000 · Human ServicesMISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE — $175,000 · Crime & LegalFREESTATE JUSTICE INC — $96,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN LEGAL CENTER FOR YOUTH CORP — $10,000 · Crime & Legal+2 more — $6,000 · Crime & Legal
Public Benefit$2,705,000Health$1,672,372Other$1,997,702Education$710,000Civil Rights$492,000Human Services$314,000Crime & Legal$287,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEQUALITY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE — $2,705,000 over 5y, 26% of budgetAIDS UNITED — $385,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION — $360,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetINDIANA AIDS FUND INC — $321,875 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC — $275,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $270,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAIDS LAW PROJECT OF PENNSYLVANIA — $202,500 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetMISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE — $175,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetEQUALITY MICHIGAN — $150,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetEQUALITY FOUNDATION OF GA INC — $142,000 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR LOUISIANA — $100,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetEquality Ohio Education Fund — $100,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetSERO PROJECT INC — $97,500 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetFREESTATE JUSTICE INC — $96,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER — $90,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCampaign For Southern Equality — $75,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetNorth Carolina Aids Action Network — $53,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSTATUS HOME INC F/K/A JERUSALEM HOUSE INC — $50,090 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNASHVILLE CARES — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUS HELPING US PEOPLE INTO LIVING INC — $40,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO VOLUNTEER LAWYER PROGRAM INC — $35,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY INC — $33,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetRealistic Education in Action Coalition to Foster Health REACH LA — $33,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC — $31,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNational Minority AIDS Council — $30,125 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFoothill AIDS Project — $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOUR HOUSE OF PORTLAND INC — $29,963 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSouthern Arizona AIDS Foundation — $29,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYoung Scholars For Academic Empowerment dba TruEvolution Inc — $28,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS FOR LIFE CORPORATION — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE VISION COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO — $25,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetInstitute of Women & Ethnic Studies — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAIDS DELAWARE INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetALLIANCE FOR HOUSING AND HEALING — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBebashi-Transition to Hope — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAID ATLANTA INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO HOUSE & SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY — $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTransgender Advocates Knowledgeable Empowering — $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCamp Laurel Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCONEJO FREE CLINIC — $25,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetTRANSLATINA NETWORK INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLost-N-Found Youth Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHEARTS EVERYWHERE REACHING OUT FOR CHILDREN INC — $25,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetARTS IGNITE INC — $22,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetHUDSON VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $22,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Broadway Caresequity …The Mac AIDS FundThe Estee Lauder Comp…AIDS UnitedElton John AIDS Found…AIDS Healthcare Found…Kent Richard Hofmann …Borealis PhilanthropyHuman Rights Campaign…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Equality California I…Emory University
Broadway Caresequity Fights AIDS IncNY92.7× affinity48 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Broadway Caresequity Fights AIDS Inc · The Mac AIDS Fund · The Estee Lauder Companies Charitable Foundation · AIDS United · Elton John AIDS Foundation Inc · AIDS Healthcare Foundation · Kent Richard Hofmann Foundation In · Borealis Philanthropy · Human Rights Campaign Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Equality California Institute · Emory University

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Elizabeth Taylor AIDS Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Delaware Hiv Services Inc — 40% of income from government
  • The Ministry of Caring Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Baltimore Safe Haven Corp — 28% of income from government
  • Fenway Community Health Center Inc — 27% of income from government
  • Cascade Aids Project — 13% of income from government
  • Aids Delaware Inc — 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
48report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Elizabeth Taylor AIDS Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Elizabeth Taylor AIDS Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 147 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home