· Public charity
AIDS Healthcare Foundation
AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION, headquartered in los angeles, california is a not for profit healthcare organization incorporated in 1987.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 31 grants below total $883,901 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $17,704,619 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $16,820,718 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $476k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $400k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VIA CARE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $100,000 |
| MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC | $100,000 |
| HEALTH GLOBAL ACCESS PROJECT INC | $50,000 |
| GUIDING RIGHT INC | $50,000 |
| AIDS SERVICE CENTER OF LOWER MANHATTAN | $50,000 |
| FEAST INC | $50,000 |
| METRO DC COMMUNITY CENTER INC | $40,000 |
| GRANADA ON BROADWAY OUTREACH | $40,000 |
| NATIONAL CENTER FOR CIVIL & HUMAN RIGHTS | $30,000 |
| COMMUNITY PARTNERS | $30,000 |
| PUBLIC CITIZEN FOUNDATION INC | $25,000 |
| BLACK ALPHABET NFP | $25,000 |
| EMPOWERING TRANSGENDER SERVICES INC | $25,000 |
| SILENCE THE SHAME INC | $24,000 |
| SERO PROJECT INC | $24,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +53% for the ones you funded once.
110 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 98 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $579k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YSYoung Scholars For Academic Empowerment dba TruEvolution Inc2× · 2017–2018 · $150k · revenue +703%
- GOGRANADA ON BROADWAY OUTREACH PROJECT5× · 2018–2024 · $142k · revenue +354% · 73% of their budget
- CLCamp Laurel Foundation5× · 2017–2021 · $140k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- AFAID FOR AIDS INTERNATIONAL INCone grant, 2018 · $150k · revenue -35%
- CCChattanooga Cares Incgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $51k · revenue +536%
- SASOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INCone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +8%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Hiv/aids counseling/assistance
EMPOWERING LGBT PEOPLE, BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITY. NEW YORK CITY'S LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER EMPOWERS PEOPLE TO LEAD HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL LIVES. The Center celebrates our community and advocates for justice and…
The mission of legacy community health services is, "driving healthy change in our communities." our vision is, "connecting our communities to health every day, in every way."
Our mission is to ameliorate disparities faced by transgender, gender non-binary and intersex people as well as help reduce similar disparities among our lesbian, gay and bisexual communities.
Provide HIV/STD testing and support for those affected
Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids
Afro Pride fosters the mental and social wellness of the Afrocentric LGBTQ community and those who love and support them.
San francisco aids foundation promotes health, wellness, and social justice for communities most impacted by hiv, through sexual health and substance use services, advocacy, and community partnerships.
Aids project of the east bay (apeb) is focused on the prevention of the spread of hiv and supports individuals living with the virus through programs targeted at some of the most vulnerable and marginalized individuals. apeb seeks to…
Increase women and families access to HIV testing, care and treatment.
Access Support Network saves and enhances lives of people in our community affected by HIV and Hep. C. It provides access to comprehensive critical services that empower its clients.
Housing works is a vibrant, healing community of people living with and affected by hiv/aids. our mission is to end the dual crises of homelessness and aids through relentless advocacy, the provision of lifesaving services, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is M F Place Inc and the most unlike its peers is My Cool Solutions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
228 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 228 of the 293 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GLOBAL LIVINGSTON INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds AID FOR AIDS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Young Scholars For Academic Empowerment dba TruEvolution Inc ↗
- Who funds GRANADA ON BROADWAY OUTREACH PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Camp Laurel Foundation ↗
- Who funds BEACON 360 MANAGEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
- Who funds CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN SERVICES COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds AUNT RITA'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AIDS SERVICE CENTER OF LOWER MANHATTAN INC ↗
- Who funds Intersection for the Arts ↗
- Who funds GRIOT CIRCLE INC ↗
- Who funds VIA CARE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds SERO PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE AND DREAMS INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Hope for Hilltribes Inc ↗
- Who funds AID AFRICA ↗
- Who funds From The Heart Productions ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES BROTHERHOOD CRUSADE - BLACK UNITED FUND INC ↗
- Who funds TRANSGENDER HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER ↗
- Who funds Project Kindle ↗
- Who funds LIGHT HEALTH AND WELLNESS COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds GARDEN STATE EQUALITY EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds THE FUTURE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GUIDING RIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds PROJECTQ ↗
- Who funds Future Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HEALTH THROUGH WALLS INC ↗
- Who funds UC RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD AIDS MUSEUM INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT ALCOHOL AND DRUG EDUCATION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds BROWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Chattanooga Cares Inc ↗
- Who funds WRITERS PLANNERS TRAINERS ↗
- Who funds HEALTH GLOBAL ACCESS PROJECT INCORPORATED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: AIDS United · Broadway Caresequity Fights AIDS Inc · The Elizabeth Taylor AIDS Foundation · Elton John AIDS Foundation Inc · The Mac AIDS Fund · Borealis Philanthropy · Liberty Hill Foundation · The Estee Lauder Companies Charitable Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Our Fund Foundation Inc · The California Endowment · Proteus Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization AIDS Healthcare Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Light Health and Wellness Comprehensive Services Inc — 74% of income from government
- The Pride Center of Maryland Inc — 49% of income from government
- Urban League of Broward County Inc — 44% of income from government
- Camp Rehoboth Inc — 33% of income from government
- Guiding Right Inc — 28% of income from government
- Health Through Walls Inc — 19% of income from government
- Moveable Feast Inc — 18% of income from government
- Centerlink Inc — 12% of income from government
- Aids Delaware Inc — 9% of income from government
- Maven Leadership Collective — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.