Skip to content

· Private foundation

Abell-Hanger Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$12M
Granted FY2025still arriving
382
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$23MHealth$12MHuman Services$9.2MArts & Culture$5.0MHousing & Shelter$3.7MCommunity Improvement$3.2MYouth Development$3.1MFood & Nutrition$3.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 382 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k245 grants · $767k
  • $10k–50k80 grants · $1.6M
  • $50k–250k46 grants · $3.9M
  • $250k+11 grants · $6.0M
$6,250
Median grant
15
States reached
$135M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER$1,150,000
HARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$850,000
MIDLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$800,000
YMCA OF MIDLAND$700,000
MIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$650,000
MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$385,788
MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$326,480
MIDLAND SHARED SPACES INC (MSS)$300,000
MIDLAND ATHLETIC SYNDICATE INC$298,368
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS PERMIAN BASIN$250,000
BASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS$250,000
ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$210,991
CITY OF MIDLAND$200,000
MISSION AGAPE$150,000
WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK$125,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $7.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP: $170k → 18%AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP: $150k → 18%AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP: $120k → 18%MIDLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $400k → 12%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $250k → 14%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $250k → 14%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $250k → 14%GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $100k → 12%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $170k → 14%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $165k → 14%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $165k → 14%UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC: $100k → 12%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $125k → 14%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $113k → 14%GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $75k → 12%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $110k → 14%GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $75k → 12%GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $75k → 12%GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $75k → 12%GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $75k → 12%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $100k → 14%GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $75k → 12%GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $75k → 12%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $90k → 14%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $90k → 14%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $90k → 14%BASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS: $70k → 12%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $80k → 14%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $80k → 14%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $75k → 14%UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC: $50k → 12%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $65k → 14%THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $65k → 14%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $65k → 14%THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $64k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $50k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 14%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $100k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $100k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $85k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $85k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $85k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $80k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $75k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $75k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $75k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $75k → 12%MANOR PARK INC: $300k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Abell-Hanger Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Abell-Hanger Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$65M · 225 repeat orgs$4.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

225 repeat relationships: 133 still active in FY2025, 92 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

225
128

Total granted

$65M
$4.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+6%

Still filing today

68%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $654k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $6.4M · revenue +93% · 29% of their budget
  • WT
    WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK
    8× · 2018–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +90%
  • OC
    ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +206% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • RT
    Remember the Alamo Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue -9%
  • MC
    MIDLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP
    one grant, 2022 · $400k · revenue -53% · 45% of their budget
  • CC
    CRISIS CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $300k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
2
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
3
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

—
4
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit
5
Presbyterian Medical Care Mission

Operate a non-profit medical clinic exclusively for charitable purposes to provide medical health services to uninsured and low income adults in the Abilene area.

—
6
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
7
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
8
Progress Texas

Progress Texas is a non-profit media organization advocating for progressive ideals and policies in our state.

Civil Rights
9
Texas Girls and Boys Ranch

Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.

Human Services
10
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
11
Commission Shift

Commission Shift is reforming oil and gas oversight by building public support to hold the Railroad Commission of Texas accountable to its mission in a shifting energy landscape.

Environment
12
Presbyterian Medical Services

Presbyterian medical services designs and delivers quality, integrated health, education, and human services in response to identified community needs of the multicultural people of the southwest.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Public Policy Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Midland Project Graduation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

251 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 251 of the 384 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

13
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
59
Early backer (in before they grew)
240/251
Grantees still filing
158/251
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $2,879,400 · OtherMIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2,019,100 · OtherWEST TEXAS FOOD BANKUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $1,563,555 · OtherMIDLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1,215,350 · Other+115 more: $22,105,724 · Other+115 moreMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6,418,054 · EducationMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATIO…ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,858,463 · EducationODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION…HARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $1,700,000 · EducationHARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLSIDEA Public Schools: $1,355,524 · EducationIDEA Public SchoolsBYNUM SCHOOL: $1,171,550 · EducationBYNUM SCHOOLTexas Interscholastic League Foundation: $714,000 · Education+13 more: $2,451,718 · Education+13 moreTHE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $1,496,177 · Human ServicesTHE SPRINGBOARD …The Nonprofit Management Center of the Permian Basin Inc: $1,414,426 · Human ServicesThe Nonprofit Ma…CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $952,175 · Human ServicesCENTERS FOR CHIL…Young Men's Christian Association of Midland Texas: $804,400 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Chri…BASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS: $706,500 · Human ServicesBASIN DREAM CENT…GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $653,293 · Human ServicesGREATER IDEAL FA…SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC: $614,750 · Human ServicesSENIOR LIFE MIDL…HELPING HANDS OF MIDLAND INC: $570,925 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS OF…AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP INC: $444,000 · Human ServicesMIDLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $400,000 · Human ServicesBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $375,000 · Human ServicesMANOR PARK INC: $374,650 · Human Services+14 more: $1,374,271 · Human Services+14 morePERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER: $2,311,000 · HealthPERMIAN BA…HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC: $1,283,833 · HealthHIGH SKY C…MIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $677,858 · HealthMIDLAND CH…TEEN CHALLENGE-ADULT CENTERS OF TEXAS INC: $485,000 · HealthTEEN CHALL…PERMIAN BASIN REHABILITATION CENTER: $374,662 · HealthPERMIAN BA…MISSION HEALTH CARE INC: $303,750 · HealthMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS: $262,500 · Health+9 more: $524,500 · Health+9 morePERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM MUSEUM LIBRARY AND HALL OF FAME: $1,519,225 · Arts & CultureMIDLAND COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $902,795 · Arts & CultureRemember the Alamo Foundation: $500,000 · Arts & CulturePERMIAN BASIN PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC: $467,350 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST: $294,738 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $250,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $412,200 · Arts & CultureMIDLAND SHARED SPACES INC: $693,420 · Community ImprovementMIDLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC: $646,200 · Community ImprovementBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ODESSA: $372,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MIDLAND INC: $227,500 · Youth DevelopmentBoys and Girls Clubs of the Permian Basin Inc: $192,600 · Youth DevelopmentRedirectional Outreach Program Efforts for Youth: $98,250 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $87,750 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP FIRE WEST TEXAS: $50,000 · Youth Development
Other$29,783,129Education$15,669,309Human Services$10,180,567Health$6,223,103Arts & Culture$4,346,308Community Improvement$1,339,620Youth Development$1,028,600

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6,418,054 over 8y, 29% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER: $2,311,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2,019,100 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,858,463 over 8y, 30% of budgetHARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $1,700,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM MUSEUM LIBRARY AND HALL OF FAME: $1,519,225 over 8y, 26% of budgetTHE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $1,496,177 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetThe Nonprofit Management Center of the Permian Basin Inc: $1,414,426 over 8y, 26% of budgetIDEA Public Schools: $1,355,524 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC: $1,283,833 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetMIDLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1,215,350 over 6y, 12% of budgetBYNUM SCHOOL: $1,171,550 over 8y, 13% of budgetCENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $952,175 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetMIDLAND ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $942,700 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetMIDLAND COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $902,795 over 8y, 8.2% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Midland Texas: $804,400 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetTexas Interscholastic League Foundation: $714,000 over 7y, 10.0% of budgetBASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS: $706,500 over 3y, 30% of budgetMIDLAND SHARED SPACES INC: $693,420 over 7y, 12% of budgetMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $677,858 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetMARC INC: $659,250 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetGREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $653,293 over 8y, 29% of budgetMIDLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC: $646,200 over 7y, 9.6% of budgetSENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC: $614,750 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetHELPING HANDS OF MIDLAND INC: $570,925 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetMidland Rape Crisis Center Inc: $525,000 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetCASA OF WEST TEXAS: $506,603 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetRemember the Alamo Foundation: $500,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMIDLAND ATHLETIC SYNDICATE INC: $489,368 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTEEN CHALLENGE-ADULT CENTERS OF TEXAS INC: $485,000 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC: $467,350 over 7y, 7.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE PERMIAN BA: $463,400 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF EL PASO COUNTY: $461,200 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetTEEN FLOW YOUTH MINISTRY: $457,958 over 8y, 14% of budgetAMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP INC: $444,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetEDUCATE MIDLAND: $440,000 over 4y, 33% of budgetLITERACY COALITION OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $438,860 over 3y, 12% of budgetBill of Rights Institute: $425,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetCITY OF MIDLAND AQUATICS INC: $402,104 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetMIDLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $400,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetAPHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC: $387,125 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $375,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN REHABILITATION CENTER: $374,662 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetMANOR PARK INC: $374,650 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ODESSA: $372,500 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetUNLOCK MINISTRIES INC DBA OPPORTUNITY TRIBE: $346,150 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetI-20 WILDLIFE PRESERVE & JENNA WELCH NATURE STUDY CENTER: $345,217 over 7y, 30% of budgetCRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS: $345,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM MUSEUM LIBRARY AND HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Nonprofit Management Center of the Permian Basin Inc ↗
  • Who funds IDEA Public Schools ↗
  • Who funds HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND COMMUNITY THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Midland Texas ↗
  • Who funds Texas Interscholastic League Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND SHARED SPACES INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MARC INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS OF MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds Midland Rape Crisis Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF WEST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Remember the Alamo Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND ATHLETIC SYNDICATE INC ↗
  • Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE-ADULT CENTERS OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Permian Basin Area FoundationTX202.4× affinity109 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Permian Basin Area Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation · Fmh Foundation · The Henry Foundation · Beal Foundation · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Warren Charitable Foundation · Yarborough Foundation · The Fasken Foundation · Bryant Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abell-Hanger Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abell-Hanger Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 384 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Abell-Hanger’s filings →

More from the funding graph