· Private foundation
Beal Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k52 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k27 grants · $2.3M
- $250k+4 grants · $2.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MIDLAND ATHLETIC SYNDICATE | $1,000,000 |
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH MIDLAND | $550,000 |
| BASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS | $405,000 |
| MISSION AGAPE | $391,000 |
| YMCA OF MIDLAND | $200,000 |
| BYNUM SCHOOL | $190,000 |
| MIDLAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER & CAC | $185,000 |
| TRINITY SCHOOL OF MIDLAND | $150,000 |
| HIGH SKY CHILDREN'S RANCH | $120,000 |
| STICK HORSES AND CAPES | $100,000 |
| WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK | $100,000 |
| MIDLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $95,000 |
| MIDLAND CHILDREN'S REHABILITATION CENTER | $95,000 |
| SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER | $82,000 |
| THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
122 repeat relationships — 76 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SLSENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +18%
- MCMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +40%
- TSTRINITY SCHOOL OF MIDLAND TEXAS8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +118%
Funded once
- MCMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +95%
- MCMIDLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $500k · revenue -91%
- HSHILLANDER SCHOOL INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $121k · revenue +55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Improving lives by providing exceptional and compassionate therapy services.
Providing mental healthcare to restore hope and healing
The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.
The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.
Operate a non-profit medical clinic exclusively for charitable purposes to provide medical health services to uninsured and low income adults in the Abilene area.
Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.
The H.O.R.S.E. Center is an established, multi-faceted equine facility committed to deepening the strength of emotional, physical, and conceptual connections utilizing diverse modalities to to elevate our clients to better themselves.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
Presbyterian medical services designs and delivers quality, integrated health, education, and human services in response to identified community needs of the multicultural people of the southwest.
The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.
The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.
It is the mission of the organization to provide services to disadvantaged and homeless families with children; to reintegrate homeless families with children into permanent housing and employment.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midland Shared Spaces Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
114 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 114 of the 170 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN ↗
- Who funds SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TRINITY SCHOOL OF MIDLAND TEXAS ↗
- Who funds MARC INC ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND ATHLETIC SYNDICATE INC ↗
- Who funds Midland Rape Crisis Center Inc ↗
- Who funds The Fields Edge ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER ↗
- Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION AGAPE ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Midland Texas ↗
- Who funds BASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS ↗
- Who funds CASA OF WEST TEXAS ↗
- Who funds SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REFLECTION MINISTRIES OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗
- Who funds CITY OF MIDLAND AQUATICS INC ↗
- Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Hillcrest School Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE PERMIAN BA ↗
- Who funds Midland-Odessa Symphony & Chorale Inc ↗
- Who funds Redirectional Outreach Program Efforts for Youth ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Abell-Hanger Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · The Henry Foundation · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation · Warren Charitable Foundation · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Fmh Foundation · Yarborough Foundation · The Fasken Foundation · Paul and Katherine Morrow Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Beal Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Beal Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Beal Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.