· Private foundation
Pevehouse Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k43 grants · $798k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $565k
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PETERSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $300,000 |
| MANOR PARK INC | $200,000 |
| MIDLAND COLLEGE C3 PROGRAM | $100,000 |
| ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $65,000 |
| MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART | $50,000 |
| OUR LADY OF THE HILLS REGIONAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| HIGH SKY CHILDREN'S RANCH | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC | $40,000 |
| MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST | $35,000 |
| MIDLAND-ODESSA SYMPHONY & CHORALE INC | $30,000 |
| HARMONY HOME CAC | $30,000 |
| BYNUM SCHOOL | $30,000 |
| GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION | $30,000 |
| BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
91 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2024, 42 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $178k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PHPETERSON HEALTH FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +211%
- MPMANOR PARK INC7× · 2017–2024 · $520k · revenue +49%
- TSTARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $510k · revenue ×24
Funded once
- MHMIDLAND HIGH SCHOOL PTSAone grant, 2022 · $50k
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $43k · revenue +44%- MHMIDLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +101%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.
The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.
The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
The H.O.R.S.E. Center is an established, multi-faceted equine facility committed to deepening the strength of emotional, physical, and conceptual connections utilizing diverse modalities to to elevate our clients to better themselves.
To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.
The organization operates an adult day care facility in midland, texas which offers a multi-disciplinary, comprehensive health and activity program for frail and impaired elderly and disabled residents.
Providing mental healthcare to restore hope and healing
Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…
TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.
Permian basin animal advocates strives to educate and help the public with spay and neuter while also rescuing abandoned or unwanted animals and finding them forever homes.
Provide quality primary and preventataive health care services to those in need.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freedom Center Texas and the most unlike its peers is Share Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 180 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PETERSON HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MANOR PARK INC ↗
- Who funds TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OUR LADY OF THE HILLS CATHOLIC HIGH ↗
- Who funds The Museum of Western Art ↗
- Who funds HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗
- Who funds TEXAS LIONS CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Hillcrest School Inc ↗
- Who funds APHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION ↗
- Who funds Midland-Odessa Symphony & Chorale Inc ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC ↗
- Who funds CASA DE AMIGOS OF MIDLAND TEXASINC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE PERMIAN BASIN INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MIDLAND INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST MIDLAND COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC ↗
- Who funds RAPHAEL COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds PERMIAN BASIN REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CHILDREN'S MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM CENTER TEXAS ↗
- Who funds CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARATHON PUBLIC LIBRARY AND HISTORY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds HARMONY HOME CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NEW HORIZONS RANCH & CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Abell-Hanger Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation · Fmh Foundation · Warren Charitable Foundation · The Henry Foundation · Beal Foundation · The Fasken Foundation · Bryant Family Foundation · James a Buddy Davidson Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pevehouse Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Pevehouse Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Pevehouse Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.