Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

CRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS

CRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS (Texas) receives grants from 28 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,718,536 to it, the largest being FMH FOUNDATION ($490,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$2.4M
Funders on record
28
Grants received
$1.7M
Net assets
$6.6M
12/28 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 19%
01What it does

What Crisis Center of West Texas does

Mission

Crisis Center of West Texas' mission is to respond, shelter, and educate to end domestic and sexual violence in west texas.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Victim services - Crisis Center of West Texas operates a toll-free emergency hotline that is available 24/7 and is answered by trained crisis line advocates. The trained sexual assault response advocate team is on call 24/7 to respond to the hospital for advocacy and support to victims of sexual assault. Advocates provide accompaniment for survivors to medical, law enforcement and legal services. Counseling, case management and advocacy are all provided to both residential and non-residential clients.Crisis Center of West Texas operates a 61-bed shelter called louise wood angel house in odessa, texas. Shelter - louise wood angel house shelter provides a safe, home-like, trauma informed environment for adult survivors and their minor children who are fleeing family violence. The shelter is home to approximately 500 survivors per year with an average stay of 24 days. During the stay, on-site case managers work with residents and their children to establish a safety plan to address immediate safety concerns and a goal plan to work toward a life free from violence.a survivor-centered approach is critical to the work inside and outside the shelter. Empowering survivors, their children,…

    $1,555,403 spent
    84% of program spending
  2. The prevention education and community awareness team provides education engagement opportunities to over 10,000 students and adults annually throughout the nine county service area. Programs include primary prevention education, domestic and sexual violence awareness, safe dating/teen violence awareness to help end cycles of abuse. Certified partner training is provided to civic clubs and businesses as well as training for professionals. Ccwtx provides in-person and asynchronous education on the topics of sexual assault awareness, teen dating violence awareness, and domestic violence education throughout our nine county service area to increase knowledge of dynamics of abuse, community resources and victims' rights.

    $304,905 spent
    16% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,860,308.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($5.2M) Expenses 100 ($1.6M) Net assets 100 ($5.6M)2019 Revenue 35 ($1.8M) Expenses 114 ($1.8M) Net assets 101 ($5.7M)2020 Revenue 31 ($1.6M) Expenses 117 ($1.9M) Net assets 97 ($5.4M)2021 Revenue 46 ($2.4M) Expenses 122 ($2.0M) Net assets 105 ($5.9M)2022 Revenue 44 ($2.3M) Expenses 130 ($2.1M) Net assets 110 ($6.1M)2023 Revenue 47 ($2.5M) Expenses 137 ($2.2M) Net assets 116 ($6.5M)2024 Revenue 46 ($2.4M) Expenses 150 ($2.4M) Net assets 117 ($6.6M)
2018201920202021202220232024
Revenue (46)Expenses (150)Net assets (117)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $6.2M to $6.6M (+6%).

$6.1M
$6.0M
$5.7M
$6.0M
$6.2M
$6.6M
$6.7M
2018201920202021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2018 16% · 2019 47% · 2020 54% · 2021 65% · 2022 66% · 2023 65% · 2024 71%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$3.6M
’18
−$35k
’19
−$287k
’20
$412k
’21
$157k
’22
$259k
’23
−$19k
’24
7.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2018201920202021202220232024
Listed20181312131212
Joined·+6+1+5+4+2+0
No longer listed·866330
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 11 funders, grant income rose $62k → $267k.

5 of 28 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 29% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

29%
largest funder
66%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 56% · 2018 85% · 2019 49% · 2020 33% · 2021 34% · 2022 43% · 2023 30% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

37% of CRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 43% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

98% of CRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS's grant income comes from Texas funders.

MO
VA
NC
AL
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $61k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like CRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

79% of spending goes to programs.

Program 79%Management 19%Fundraising 2%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

92%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS?
CRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS (Texas) receives grants from 28 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,718,536 to it, the largest being FMH FOUNDATION ($490,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS have?
IRS filings report 28 organizations giving $1,718,536 in grants to CRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS?
FMH FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $490,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Crisis Center of West Texas →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 28 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing