Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

John Muirmt Diablo Community Health Fund

The john muir/mt.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$3.0MEmployment$933kEnvironment$556kYouth Development$477kHuman Services$459kCrime & Legal$430kEducation$352kPublic Safety & Disaster$333kReligion$328kOther$1.6M
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.1M
$102,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$23k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONUMENT IMPACT$175,000
LA CONCORDIA WELLNESS CENTER$155,000
HIJAS DEL CAMPO$147,600
DELTA BAY IMPACT$135,000
GANAS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION$125,000
VILLAGE KEEPERS$102,500
PEOPLE WHO CARE$90,000
CONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER$65,000
LOAVES AND FISHES OF CONTRA COSTA$65,000
PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE$40,000
AKHILA HEALTH$17,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $459k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SOCIETY OF STVINCENT DE PAUL OF CONTRA COSTA: $22k → 9%MEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION: $152k → 9%MEALS ON WHEELS AND SENIOR OUTREACH SERVICES: $150k → 9%DELTA BAY IMPACT: $135k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.8M · 25 repeat orgs$695k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against -48% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
8

Total granted

$7.8M
$328k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
-48%

Still filing today

96%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $367k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEmploymentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $1.3M · revenue +66%
  • OJ
    OPPORTUNITY JUNCTION INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $758k · revenue +63%
  • JM
    John Muir Land Trust prev Muir Heritage Land Trust
    3× · 2020–2022 · $556k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • JF
    JOHN F KENNEDY UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $177k · revenue -92%
  • PP
    Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $60k · revenue +20%
  • CS
    CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY San Francisco Bay Area
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -84%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
2
La Raza Centro Legal - San Francisco

La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.

—
3
Centro Legal De La Raza

Centro Legal De La Raza is a comprehensive legal services agency protecting and advancing the rights of low-income immigrant communities throguh culturally competent bilingual legal representation, education, and advocacy.

Crime & Legal
4
Community Health Centers of the Central Coast Inc

To provide primary health and dental care services to low income patients in the Central Coast Communities of California

Health
5
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
6
Equity Health

Our mission is to ensure health care access to quality comprehensive health care services for persons who are medically needy or medically under-served and have traditionally experienced difficulty in getting care from traditional sources.

—
7
Communicare Health Centers

Communicare health center's mission is rooted in the underlying philosophy that health care is a right, not a privilege. our mission is characterized by the following commitments: (i) we provide comprehensive and high-quality health care…

—
8
Open Door Community Health Centers

Open Door Community Health Centers promotes social justice and human dignity through exceptional patient-centered care that improves the health and well-being of our patients, community, and staff.

Health
9
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
10
Nourish California

To collaborate with diverse community partners for policy change, ensuring equitable access to food, health, and well-being for all Californians.

Food & Nutrition
11
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
12
Just Communities Central Coast

At Just Communities we work to ensure that Central Coast schools, organizations, and communities are places of opportunity, not places of limitation. We advance justice by engaging our community in leadership development, dialogue, action…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Community Services East Bay and the most unlike its peers is John F Kennedy University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%15%<5yr15%6%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr12%21%35–55yr12%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%12%<5yr15%2%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr17%37%20–35yr12%21%35–55yr12%14%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 12% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
13%
2,151/16,243

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/35
Grantees still filing
24/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC — $1,327,862 · HealthLA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INCCONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER — $478,411 · HealthCONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTERJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY — $375,352 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAS…CHOICE IN AGING — $201,325 · HealthCHOICE IN AGINGLA CONCORDIA WELLNESS CENTER — $185,000 · HealthLA CONCORDIA WELLNESS CENTERPeople Who Care Children's Association — $178,750 · HealthPeople Who Care Children's AssociationDENTISTS ON WHEELS — $102,000 · Health+5 more — $156,975 · HealthLoaves and Fishes of Contra Costa — $507,266 · OtherLoaves and Fishes of Contra CostaEMPOWERED AGING INC — $463,200 · OtherEMPOWERED AGING INCCommunity Clinic Consortium — $160,000 · OtherCommunity Clinic ConsortiumJOHN F KENNEDY UNIVERSITY — $177,000 · OtherJOHN F KENNEDY UNIVERSITYHIJAS DEL CAMPO — $332,600 · OtherHIJAS DEL CAMPORUAH COMMUNITY OUTREACH — $328,000 · OtherRUAH COMMUNITY OUTREACHInternational Rescue Committee INC — $163,722 · OtherInternational Rescue Committee INCGANAS Community Organization — $133,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $114,800 · Other+7 more — $259,366 · Other+7 moreOPPORTUNITY JUNCTION INC — $757,546 · EmploymentOPPORTUNITY …MONUMENT IMPACT — $175,000 · EmploymentMONUMENT IMP…John Muir Land Trust prev Muir Heritage Land Trust — $555,705 · EnvironmentMindful Life Project — $476,500 · Youth DevelopmentMEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION — $302,375 · Human ServicesDELTA BAY IMPACT — $135,000 · Human ServicesDISTRICT COUNCIL OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE — $21,690 · Human ServicesContra Costa Senior Legal Services — $239,500 · Crime & LegalLove Never Fails Inc — $190,150 · Crime & Legal
Health$3,005,675Other$2,638,954Employment$932,546Environment$555,705Youth Development$476,500Human Services$459,065Crime & Legal$429,650

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC — $1,327,862 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetOPPORTUNITY JUNCTION INC — $757,546 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetJohn Muir Land Trust prev Muir Heritage Land Trust — $555,705 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetLoaves and Fishes of Contra Costa — $507,266 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetCONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER — $478,411 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetMindful Life Project — $476,500 over 4y, 16% of budgetEMPOWERED AGING INC — $463,200 over 6y, 17% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY — $375,352 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetHIJAS DEL CAMPO — $332,600 over 3y, 48% of budgetRUAH COMMUNITY OUTREACH — $328,000 over 3y, 74% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION — $302,375 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetContra Costa Senior Legal Services — $239,500 over 4y, 42% of budgetCHOICE IN AGING — $201,325 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetLove Never Fails Inc — $190,150 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetLA CONCORDIA WELLNESS CENTER — $185,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetPeople Who Care Children's Association — $178,750 over 4y, 24% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY UNIVERSITY — $177,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMONUMENT IMPACT — $175,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $163,722 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Clinic Consortium — $160,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $114,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDENTISTS ON WHEELS — $102,000 over 2y, 63% of budgetLOS MEDANOS COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $80,600 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc — $60,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRainbow Community Center of Contra Costa County — $55,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCALIFONIA STATE UNIVERSITY EAST BAY FOUNDATION INC — $49,344 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDIABLO VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $45,399 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetPublic Health Institute — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY San Francisco Bay Area — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC — $21,975 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISTRICT COUNCIL OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE — $21,690 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetContra Costa Regional Health Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDiablo Valley Foundation For The Aging — $5,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community Fo…Dean and Margaret Les…Kaiser Foundation Hos…The San Francisco Fou…Antioch Community Fou…Justice Justice Found…Contra Costa Regional…John Muir HealthUnited Way of the Bay…San Jose Mercury News…Food Bank of Contra C…Sutter Bay Hospitals
East Bay Community FoundationCA41.8× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The San Francisco Foundation · Antioch Community Foundation Attn Keith Archuleta · Justice Justice Foundation · Contra Costa Regional Health Foundation · John Muir Health · United Way of the Bay Area · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano · Sutter Bay Hospitals

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John Muirmt Diablo Community Health Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines