How much did JOHN MUIR HEALTH grant in FY2024?

Health$790MPhilanthropy$12MHuman Services$2.8MCrime & Legal$1.3MYouth Development$715kRecreation & Sports$620kEmployment$565kHousing & Shelter$540kInternational$454kOther$2.4M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

—

2021

foodfinancialemergency responsecelebrationcontra costamobilityyouth

2022

foodpart everydaycontra costamobilitysocialrecoverybike

2023

shelterpreventfoodcancercontra costarecoveryhcc

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k5 grants · $36k
$10k–50k19 grants · $509k
$50k–250k23 grants · $2.2M
$250k+6 grants · $139M

$50,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.6B

Total assets

Largest grants

JOHN MUIR PHYSICIAN NETWORK$117,627,624
JOHN MUIR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$11,945,476
JOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION$7,371,953
JOHN MUIRMT DIABLO COMMUNITY HEALTH FUND$1,461,213
FRED FINCH YOUTH CENTER$504,451
CONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER$492,500
OPERATION ACCESS$175,000
MENTAL HEALTH CONNECTION$160,000
RYSE CENTER$160,000
INSPIRING COMMUNITIES$155,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$143,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$130,000
MONUMENT IMPACT$130,000
HOPE SOLUTIONS$117,000
CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT$106,363

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 9%. 6% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$811M · 58 repeat orgs$491k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +86% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

58 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$811M

$338k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%

+36%

Still filing today

97%

93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $154k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

JM
John Muir Physician Network
8× · 2017–2024 · $657M · revenue +41%
JM
John Muir Behavioral Health
8× · 2017–2024 · $82M · revenue +8% · 25% of their budget
JM
John Muir Health Foundation
8× · 2017–2024 · $48M · revenue +126% · 51% of their budget

Funded once

CC
CONTRA COSTA CARES
one grant, 2021 · $125k · revenue -15% · 78% of their budget
WI
WRIGHT INSTITUTE
one grant, 2022 · $86k · revenue +10%
DO
DENTISTS ON WHEELSgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +84%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Contra Costa Crisis Center

The Contra Costa Crisis Center's mission is to keep people in Contra Costa County, California alive and safe, help them through crises, and connect them with culturally relevant resources in the community.

Health

Axis Community Health Inc

The mission of Axis Community Health is to provide quality, affordable, accessible, and compassionate health care services that promote the well being of all members of the community.

Health

Community Housing Sonoma County

Community Housing Sonoma County creates supportive housing communities for people living with disabling conditions, especially veterans.

Housing & Shelter

United Health Centers of the San Joaquin

The organization is committed to the lifetime wellness of the communities by providing accessible, comprehensive quality health care to everyone with the compassion and respect, regardless of ability to pay.

Health

Comprehensive Community Health Centers

Cchc mission is to ensure the health and wellness of each individual so every person may reach their fullest human potential within a caring environment.

Health

Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health

Hospital Council of N & C California

To provide membership services, local level issue management, education, shared services, research, media support & consultation to northern california hospitals.

—

Everyones Harvest

Everyone's Harvest's mission is to provide access to healthy, affordable fruits and vegetables through certified farmers markets and community food programs.

Food & Nutrition

Communicare Health Centers

Communicare health centers is a private, non-profit health care organization providing comprehensive medical and dental services, substance abuse treatment, behavioral health services, and health education throughout yolo county at four…

—

Community Health Center of

To provide our diverse community with access to high quality, affordable primary health care

Health

Bay Area Cancer Connections

Bay area cancer connections ("bacc") provides an array of services, which collectively, aim to ensure that from diagnosis through thriving post-treatment and living with cancer, those facing breast and/or ovarian cancer have the…

Health

California Coastkeeper

California Coastkeeper Alliance coordinates, supports & enhances the work of the local California Waterkeeper programs to provide a statewide voice for safeguarding California's waters, and its world renowned coast & ocean, for the benefit…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity Junction Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kidpower Teenpower Fullpower. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/79

the rest of the field

11%

1,836/16,201

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

74 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

74/74

Grantees still filing

63/74

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$790,417,166Philanthropy$11,817,785Human Services$2,842,985Other$3,987,185Crime & Legal$1,327,500Youth Development$715,000Recreation & Sports$620,054

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community FoundationCA57.7× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sutter Bay Hospitals · The San Francisco Foundation · Contra Costa Regional Health Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation · Tipping Point Community · White Pony Express · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Justice Justice Foundation · Hedco Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JOHN MUIR HEALTH funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: John MuirMt Diablo Community Health Fund.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~0 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 911788973 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on John MuirMt Diablo Community Health Fund, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to John Muir Health?

Find your warmest path to John Muir Health through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JOHN MUIR HEALTH

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

74 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John Muir Health?

More from the funding graph

JOHN MUIR HEALTH

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

74 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John Muir Health?

More from the funding graph