Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Grantmakers Concerned With Immigrants and Refugees

GCIR works to ensure that funders have up to date information, opportunities to strategize and peer connections to enhance their grantmaking and impact.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Community Improvement$9.0MHuman Services$2.5MPhilanthropy$2.2MHealth$2.0MCrime & Legal$1.1MEducation$659kCivil Rights$590kEmployment$250kArts & Culture$235kOther$2.1M
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $137k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.2M
$75,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$8.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Tides Center VietRise$90,000
Social Good Fund Contra Costa$90,000
CA Collaborative for Immigran$90,000
Inland Coalition For Immigran$90,000
Central Valley Immigrant Inte$90,000
African Advocacy Network$90,000
Partnership for the Advancet$75,000
Pangea Legal Services$75,000
Todec Legal Center$75,000
Centro Binacional Para El Des$75,000
Texas Latino Pride$50,000
Michigan United$50,000
Este Poder$50,000
Progressive Lship Alliance$50,000
Louisiana Org for Refugees$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Multicultural Center of Marin: $63k → 8%Latino Health Access: $24k → 10%La Familia Counseling Ctr: $316k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SVCS COMM SVC: $40k → 11%KOREAN RESOURCE CENTER: $9k → 14%North Coast Opportunity: $9k → 18%Central Valley Immigrant Inte: $90k → 19%Mano Amiga: $47k → 10%Tennessee Justice for Our Nei: $75k → 14%Maine IniativesImmigrant &: $68k → 7%On the Move: $6k → 9%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE: $73k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SVC OF SAN DIEG: $15k → 11%Jakara Movement: $105k → 19%Tennessee Justice for Our Nei: $68k → 14%Maine IniativesImmigrant &: $45k → 7%Immigrant Legal Resource Ctr: $65k → 10%Partnership for the Advancet: $75k → 11%Todec Legal Center: $75k → 11%Immigrant Legal Resource Ctr: $50k → 10%Immigrant Legal Resource Ctr: $25k → 10%Tides Center VietRise: $90k → 10%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE: $20k → 10%African Advocacy Network: $90k → 10%Thai Community Devt Ctr: $426k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
IL
MI
NV
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.5M · 16 repeat orgs$9.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +139% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
46

Total granted

$9.5M
$8.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+139%
+27%

Still filing today

100%
93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $982k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsHealthPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NB
    North Bay Organizing Project
    5× · 2017–2021 · $7.3M · revenue +22% · 89% of their budget
  • CT
    CALIFORNIANS TOGETHER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $226k · revenue +261%
  • TA
    Texas Access to Justice Foundation
    2× · 2018–2022 · $210k · revenue +764%

Funded once

  • KI
    KOREAN IMMIGRANT WORKERS ADVOCATES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.3M · revenue +223% · 65% of their budget
  • CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $966k · revenue -15%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY
    one grant, 2020 · $896k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Comunidad Inc

Legal, immigration and community organizing

—
2
La Raza Centro Legal - San Francisco

La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.

—
3
Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights
4
Latino Community Foundation

Lcf exists to unleash the civic and economic power of latinos in california. lcf fulfills the mission by building a movement of critically engaged philanthropic leaders, investing in latino-led orgs, and increasing civic participation of…

Human Services
5
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
6
Center for Community Advocacy

Provide Educational Programs, Health Services and Legal Services to Farm Workers at housing sites and throughout the Salinas Valley and promote improved living conditions.

—
7
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates Inc

Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.

Human Services
8
Central Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy

CAUSE's mission is to build grassroots power to realize social, economic and environmental justice for the people of the Central Coast Region through policy research, leadership development, organizing and advocacy.

Community Improvement
9
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
10
Southern California Immigration Project

Southern California Immigration Project is a public interest nonprofit organization dedicated to providing pro bono legal services to survivors of human and civil rights violations.

International
11
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
12
Inner City Law Center

In 2024, Inner City Law Center, ICLC, served over 3,400 people, helping vulnerable Angelenos to remain in their homes and recover nearly $20.5 million in financial benefits.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Immigrant Legal Resource Center and the most unlike its peers is Sierra Health Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsLgbtq+ Community SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyJewish Community Organizati…Health Access Advocacy and …Christian Missionary Organi…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%5%<5yr15%22%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%30%20–35yr11%27%35–55yr13%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%2%<5yr15%46%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr11%24%35–55yr13%1%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/91
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,887

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
88/89
Grantees still filing
52/89
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

North Bay Organizing Project — $7,268,466 · Community ImprovementNorth Bay Organizing ProjectKOREAN IMMIGRANT WORKERS ADVOCATES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $1,336,294 · Community ImprovementKOREAN IMMIGRANT WORKERS ADVOCATES OF SOUTHERN CA…+8 more — $410,017 · Community ImprovementTHAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $426,078 · Human ServicesTHAI COMMUNIT…VENTURES — $364,351 · Human ServicesVENTURESLa Familia Counseling Center Inc — $316,044 · Human ServicesLa Familia Co…Central Valley Immigrant Integration Collaborative — $205,000 · Human ServicesCentral Valle…TENNESSEE JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS — $143,125 · Human ServicesTENNESSEE JUS…IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER — $118,000 · Human ServicesMAINE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE SERVICES — $113,125 · Human ServicesSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $112,033 · Human ServicesJAKARA MOVEMENT — $104,617 · Human ServicesAFRICAN ADVOCACY NETWORK — $90,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER — $90,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO — $88,016 · Human Services+8 more — $307,766 · Human Services+8 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY — $295,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FO…ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $241,125 · PhilanthropyORANGE COUNT…VENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $200,513 · PhilanthropyVENTURA COUN…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN — $200,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FO…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC — $193,125 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FO…Latino Community Fund Inc — $190,000 · PhilanthropyLatino Commu…Houston Immigration Legal ServicesCollab — $168,125 · PhilanthropyHouston Immi…CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $133,333 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA C…ARKANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $110,625 · PhilanthropyBALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC — $110,625 · PhilanthropyTHE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY — $100,000 · PhilanthropySOUTHWEST FLORIDA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $65,025 · PhilanthropyCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION — $966,278 · HealthCHINESE PRO…LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY — $896,206 · HealthLOS ANGELES…SIERRA HEALTH FOUNDATION — $133,333 · HealthSIERRA HEAL…+2 more — $17,047 · HealthInland Congregations United for Change Sponsoring Committee Inc — $287,111 · OtherInland Congregati…CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER — $250,000 · OtherCENTRAL AMERICAN …Texas Access to Justice Foundation — $210,000 · OtherTexas Access to J…UFW FOUNDATION — $181,118 · OtherUFW FOUNDATIONCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $125,000 · OtherFathers and Families of San Joaquin — $124,820 · OtherSAFE TIME HOME SHARING INC — $114,042 · OtherNorCal Resist — $215,337 · OtherNorCal ResistMONUMENT IMPACT — $249,544 · OtherMONUMENT IMPACTLATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC — $143,125 · OtherCentro Binacional Para El Desarrollo Indigena Oaxaqueno — $181,033 · OtherCentro Binacional…The Edwin & Dorothy Baker Foundation — $155,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY OUTREACH FOUNDATION OF INLAND EMPIRE — $133,333 · Other+20 more — $834,410 · Other+20 moreCENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA — $767,299 · Crime & LegalLEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC — $250,000 · Crime & LegalPangea Legal Services — $75,000 · Crime & LegalCALIFORNIANS TOGETHER — $225,618 · EducationCentro Laboral de Graton — $151,618 · EducationVISION Y COMPROMISO — $102,011 · EducationINLAND COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE — $90,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $90,000 · Education
Community Improvement$9,014,777Human Services$2,478,155Philanthropy$2,197,496Health$2,012,864Other$3,203,873Crime & Legal$1,092,299Education$659,247

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNorth Bay Organizing Project — $7,268,466 over 5y, 89% of budgetKOREAN IMMIGRANT WORKERS ADVOCATES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $1,336,294 over 1y, 65% of budgetCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION — $966,278 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY — $896,206 over 1y, 17% of budgetCENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA — $767,299 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetTHAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $426,078 over 1y, 40% of budgetVENTURES — $364,351 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetLa Familia Counseling Center Inc — $316,044 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY — $295,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetInland Congregations United for Change Sponsoring Committee Inc — $287,111 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC — $250,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetCENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER — $250,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetMONUMENT IMPACT — $249,544 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $241,125 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIANS TOGETHER — $225,618 over 2y, 16% of budgetNorCal Resist — $215,337 over 1y, 11% of budgetTexas Access to Justice Foundation — $210,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Valley Immigrant Integration Collaborative — $205,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetVENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $200,513 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN — $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC — $193,125 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLatino Community Fund Inc — $190,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetUFW FOUNDATION — $181,118 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCentro Binacional Para El Desarrollo Indigena Oaxaqueno — $181,033 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetHouston Immigration Legal ServicesCollab — $168,125 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetThe Edwin & Dorothy Baker Foundation — $155,000 over 1y, 85% of budgetCentro Laboral de Graton — $151,618 over 2y, 19% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A BETTER COMMUNITY — $151,259 over 1y, 21% of budgetTENNESSEE JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS — $143,125 over 2y, 15% of budgetLATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC — $143,125 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY OUTREACH FOUNDATION OF INLAND EMPIRE — $133,333 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $133,333 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFathers and Families of San Joaquin — $124,820 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetIMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER — $118,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMAINE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE SERVICES — $113,125 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $112,033 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetARKANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $110,625 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC — $110,625 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJAKARA MOVEMENT — $104,617 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetVISION Y COMPROMISO — $102,011 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY — $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA COLLABORATIVE FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE — $90,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetAFRICAN ADVOCACY NETWORK — $90,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $90,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINLAND COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE — $90,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $90,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST FLORIDA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The California Endowm…Tides FoundationThe California Wellne…The James Irvine Foun…Latino Community Foun…Tides CenterImmigrant Legal Resou…Weingart FoundationNEO Philanthropy IncSierra Health Foundat…East Bay Community Fo…California Immigrant …
The California EndowmentCA58.3× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The California Endowment · Tides Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Latino Community Foundation · Tides Center · Immigrant Legal Resource Center · Weingart Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · East Bay Community Foundation · California Immigrant Policy Center

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Grantmakers Concerned With Immigrants and Refugees funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 69%
  • Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc — 69% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
49report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Grantmakers Concerned With Immigrants and Refugees?

Find your warmest path to Grantmakers Concerned With Immigrants and Refugees through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines