· Private foundation
The Zellerbach Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k49 grants · $235k
- $10k–50k106 grants · $1.4M
- $50k–250k69 grants · $4.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IIBA | $170,000 |
| YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER | $150,000 |
| LIFE LEARNING ACADEMY | $100,000 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO | $100,000 |
| SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC | $100,000 |
| YOUTH LAW CENTER | $100,000 |
| TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER | $100,000 |
| CIPC | $100,000 |
| ILD | $100,000 |
| INTERFAITH MOVEMENT FOR HUMAN INTEGRITY | $85,000 |
| CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA INC | $80,000 |
| INDEPENDENT ARTS AND MEDIA | $75,000 |
| RYSE INC | $75,000 |
| COLEMAN CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES | $75,000 |
| CCIJ | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $3.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
202 repeat relationships — 124 still active in FY2024, 78 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IIIMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA4× · 2020–2023 · $695k · revenue +45%
Independent Arts & Media5× · 2020–2024 · $662k · revenue +40%- YLYOUTH LAW CENTER5× · 2020–2024 · $510k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- RUREGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CA AT BERKELEYone grant, 2020 · $190k
- TUTRUSTEE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAone grant, 2020 · $100k
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF OAKLAND DBA CATHOLIC CHARITIES EAST BAone grant, 2021 · $80k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
California Arts Advocates is a comprehensive lobbying organization for the arts, culture and creative industries and workforce.
As creative producers, we are devoted to the production and presentation of groundbreaking experiences in contemporary performance that use innovative approaches to collaboration, technology, and social engagement. As a service…
MACLA/Movimiento de Arte y Cultura Latino Americana is an inclusive contemporary arts space grounded in the Chicano/Latino experience that incubates new visual, literary and performance art in order to engage people in civic dialogue and…
Occidental Center for the Arts exists to provide a welcoming and accessible venue for the performing and visual arts in Sonoma County California for local regional national and international artists. our mission is to enrich our community…
SFP presents internationally acclaimed and emerging performing artists, introduces innovative programs, and builds new and diversified audiences for the arts through education and outreach activities.
Marin open studios is a non-profit visual arts organization dedicated to engaging and supporting marin county artists and their audiences through events, programs and services. marin open studios champions a diverse and inclusive community…
BAYCAT addresses racial, gender and economic inequity by creating powerful, authentic media while diversifying the creative industry. Through the education and employment of low-income youth, young people of color, and young women in the…
On the Boards' mission is to invest in leading contemporary performing artists near and far and connect them to a diverse range of communities interested in forward-thinking art and ideas.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Oakland Ballet Company's mission is to inspire the community by keeping the tradition of ballet exciting, vibrant and accessible.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Youth Theatre and the most unlike its peers is West Oakland Mural Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
308 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 308 of the 367 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA ↗
- Who funds Independent Arts & Media ↗
- Who funds Intersection for the Arts ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds Life Learning Academy ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER ↗
- Who funds SAFE & SOUND ↗
- Who funds W HAYWOOD BURNS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Coleman Children and Youth Services dba Coleman Advocates for Children & Youth ↗
- Who funds MOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER ↗
- Who funds MONUMENT IMPACT ↗
- Who funds DANCERS GROUP ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM ↗
- Who funds California Youth Connection ↗
- Who funds RYSE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE DBA CURYJ ↗
- Who funds Interfaith Movement for Human Integrity ↗
- Who funds Chinese for Affirmative Action ↗
- Who funds Asian Law Caucus ↗
- Who funds THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIPS FOR TRAUMA RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY INITIATIVES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY WORKS WEST INC ↗
- Who funds East Bay Agency for Children ↗
- Who funds Lincoln ↗
- Who funds FRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds Mujeres Unidas y Activas ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds National Center for Youth Law ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY FAMILY DEFENDERS ↗
- Who funds Northern California Grantmakers ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COLLABORATIVE FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kenneth Rainin Foundation · Walter and Elise Haas Fund · Phyllis C Wattis Foundation · Fleishhacker Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Center for Cultural Innovation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Sam Mazza Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Akonadi Foundation · Gerbode Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Zellerbach Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Zellerbach Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Zellerbach Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.