Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

California · Public charity

Monument Impact

Our mission is to serve as an advocate and resource in contra costa county that guides, educates, and connects low-income communities.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
7
Itemized grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$934k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$600,000
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$4.5M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Community Improvement$1.1MHealth$111kHousing & Shelter$61kHuman Services$56kScience & Tech$50kPublic Benefit$33k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Fii - National$1,020,00023%
Working Partnerships USA$110,70011%
Housing Leadership Council of San Mateo County$60,70017%
Sacred Heart Community Service$56,00020%
North Bay Organizing Project$50,00021%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($83k), not named here.

Compare Monument Impact with peer funders

About Monument Impact

How much does Monument Impact give?
Monument Impact reported 7 itemized grants totaling $934,400, out of $1,265,285 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Monument Impact fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Community Improvement (78%), Health (8%), Housing & Shelter (4%).
Who are Monument Impact's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2024: Fii - National ($1.0M), Working Partnerships USA ($111k), Housing Leadership Council of San Mateo County ($61k).
Where is Monument Impact based?
Monument Impact is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Monument Impact’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home