· Public charity
United Way of Dane County Inc
Unite the community to achieve measurable results that change lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 132 grants below total $11,376,105 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $12,506,328 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,130,223 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k23 grants · $167k
- $10k–50k64 grants · $1.3M
- $50k–250k35 grants · $4.6M
- $250k+10 grants · $5.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RISE Wisconsin | $1,203,675 |
| YWCA of Madison | $846,422 |
| United Way of Dane County Foundation | $521,491 |
| CHC Creating Healthier Communities | $467,902 |
| Centro Hispano of Dane County | $457,513 |
| The Road Home | $445,289 |
| Urban League of Greater Madison | $382,469 |
| Community Action Coalition for South Central WI | $361,726 |
| JustDane | $326,533 |
| Community Shares of Wisconsin | $308,903 |
| Journey Mental Health Center | $229,580 |
| Catholic Charities Diocese of Madison | $222,566 |
| Rainbow Project | $218,680 |
| Second Harvest Foodbank of Southern WI | $209,109 |
| Access Community Health Centers | $208,427 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $24.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
178 repeat relationships — 112 still active in FY2024, 66 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $141k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YMYWCA MADISON INC8× · 2017–2024 · $8.1M · revenue +31%
- CHCENTRO HISPANO INC8× · 2017–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +238% · 41% of their budget
- TRTHE ROAD HOME DANE COUNTY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $3.4M · revenue +68%
Funded once
- TRTENANT RESOURCE CENTER INCone grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +15%
- MPMentoring Positives Incone grant, 2021 · $101k · revenue -29%
- NFNEIGHBORHOOD FOOD SOLUTIONS INCone grant, 2021 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Unite the community to achieve measurable results that change lives.
United way of wisconsin is dedicated to supporting and enriching a strong statewide united way network that maximizes the capacity of local united ways to address human needs, improve lives and create lasting positive change across…
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
United way's mission is to improve lives.
Madison development corporation (mdc)'s mission is to help create jobs by providing gap financing to small businesses and to develop and finance quality, affordable workforce housing units in madison and the dane county area.
Madison community cooperative's mission is to improve the madison community by providing low-cost, not-for-profit cooperative housing for very low to moderate income people and to be inclusive of underrepresented and marginalized groups.
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
Make downtown madison an economically strong, equitable, inclusive, and vibrant place to live, work, and visit.
Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.
Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.
Goodwill manufacturing, inc. ("goodwill manufacturing") is a nonstock, not-for-profit wisconsin corporation, whose sole member is goodwill industries of southeastern wisconsin, inc. ("goodwill"), a wisconsin nonstock, not-for-profit…
Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stoughton Area Resource Team. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
220 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 220 of the 273 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RISE WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA MADISON INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRO HISPANO INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON ↗
- Who funds THE ROAD HOME DANE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER MADISON INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SHARES OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds JUSTDANE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION COALITION FOR SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds PORCHLIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S SERVICE SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds VERA COURT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds IRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds DANE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE RAINBOW PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE INC ↗
- Who funds EARTHSHARE ↗
- Who funds WAYFORWARD RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds Global Impact ↗
- Who funds AMERICAS BEST CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds THE PLAYING FIELD INC ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION FRESH START INC ↗
- Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds Agrace HospiceCare Inc ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN TRIAGE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds EAST MADISON COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Madison Community Foundation · Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · The Evjue Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Trustage Foundation Inc · Endres Manufacturing Foundation Inc · The Roots and Wings Foundation Inc · The Oscar Rennebohm Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Ascendium Education Solutions Inc · Sub-Zero Group Foundation Inc · Madison Rotary Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Dane County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
- Babson College — 3% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.