· Public charity
Madison Rotary Foundation
The mission of the MADISON ROTARY FOUNDATION is to work with the rotary club of madison to support its charitable activities, serve as a responsible steward of its resources, and ensure compliance with all regulations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $214,107 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $833,701 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $619,594 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $93k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $121k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MADISON METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT | $70,887 |
| URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER MADISON | $50,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF DANE COUNTY INC | $40,000 |
| ONE CITY SCHOOLS | $25,000 |
| SIMPSON STREET FREE PRESS INC | $14,110 |
| WISCONSIN YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS (WYSO) | $14,110 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $348k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DFDays For Girls International2× · 2018–2019 · $129k · revenue +38%
- OCONE CITY SCHOOLS INC2× · 2019–2025 · $80k · revenue +376%
- BBBIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF DANE COUNTY INC2× · 2024–2025 · $68k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of Wisconsin Madisonone grant, 2018 · $61k
- SOSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF MADISON INCone grant, 2023 · $10k
- FOFRIENDS OF BE AN ANGEL INCone grant, 2023 · $9k · revenue -100%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Dane county parent council changes the lives of underserved children and families through education and supportive services.
Madison community cooperative's mission is to improve the madison community by providing low-cost, not-for-profit cooperative housing for very low to moderate income people and to be inclusive of underrepresented and marginalized groups.
Unite the community to achieve measurable results that change lives.
Madison development corporation (mdc)'s mission is to help create jobs by providing gap financing to small businesses and to develop and finance quality, affordable workforce housing units in madison and the dane county area.
Madison street medicine is on a mission to develop programming and services to fill gaps in access to healthcare and housing in the madison area. we envision a community where individuals experiencing housing insecurity have equitable…
Jewish social services of madison empowers families and individuals across generations and cultures to build community and self-sufficiency, with a strong commitment to the jewish community and inspired by jewish values. we offer services…
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
Make downtown madison an economically strong, equitable, inclusive, and vibrant place to live, work, and visit.
The madison professional police officers association represents law enforcement professionals who serve the city of madison, wisconsin, as either police officers, detectives, investigators, or sergeants.
The mission of employ milwaukee, inc. is to build a strong workforce development system by planning, coordinating, collaborating and monitoring workforce initiatives with businesses, partners and community stakeholders at the local,…
Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.
Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Irwin a and Robert D Goodman Community Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Days for Girls International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MADISON SCHOOL-COMMUNITY RECREATION ↗
- Who funds Days For Girls International ↗
- Who funds ONE CITY SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER MADISON INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN YOUTH COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds THE PLAYING FIELD INC ↗
- Who funds PORCHLIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds VERA COURT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA MADISON INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROAD HOME DANE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON ↗
- Who funds BRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBOR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE MADISON INC ↗
- Who funds SIMPSON STREET FREE PRESS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MADISON INC ↗
- Who funds NEWBRIDGE MADISON INC ↗
- Who funds JUSTDANE ↗
- Who funds URBAN TRIAGE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds THE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds WAYFORWARD RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds IRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR BLACK WOMEN'S WELLNESS INC ↗
- Who funds CEOS OF TOMORROW INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF BE AN ANGEL INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UW ODYSSEY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Forward Learning Youth and Young Adults Inc ↗
- Who funds HARBOR HOUSE MOVIN' OUT INC ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Madison Community Foundation · The Evjue Foundation Inc · United Way of Dane County Inc · Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · Trustage Foundation Inc · The Roots and Wings Foundation Inc · Endres Manufacturing Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Ascendium Education Solutions Inc · The Oscar Rennebohm Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Sub-Zero Group Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Madison Rotary Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.