Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Town Pump Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
622
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$111k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Food & Nutrition$8.0MEducation$2.3MArts & Culture$2.2MHousing & Shelter$1.9MHuman Services$1.6MRecreation & Sports$1.1MHealth$891kPublic Safety & Disaster$707kOther$0
02FY2024 · 622 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k543 grants · $1.3M
  • $10k–50k72 grants · $992k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $561k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$78M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAINSTREET UPTOWN BUTTE$110,900
MONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK$100,000
CENTRAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$100,000
MAINSTREET UPTOWN BUTTE$90,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA$60,000
FRIENDS OF THE POOL & PARK FOUNDATION$50,000
MAINSTREET UPTOWN BUTTE$50,000
ACTION INC$40,000
POVERELLO CENTER INC$25,000
TREASURE STATE FOUNDATION$25,000
DEVILS BRIGADE CHAPTER 28$25,000
EAST HELENA RODEO ASSOCIATION$25,000
THE WALL THAT HEALS - BUTTE$25,000
THE PRODUCER PARTNERSHIP$25,000
PRICKLY PEAR FIREWORKS$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY HOPE INC: $18k → 9%BEAVERHEAD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $15k → 12%K9S 4 MOBILITY: $10k → 10%COMMUNITY HOPE INC: $18k → 9%MADISON VALLEY CARING & SHARING INC: $9k → 10%BEAVERHEAD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $15k → 12%COMMUNITY HOPE INC: $15k → 9%MADISON VALLEY CARING AND SHARING: $9k → 10%BEAVERHEAD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $12k → 12%COMMUNITY HOPE INC: $15k → 9%MADISON VALLEY CARING AND SHARING: $8k → 10%BEAVERHEAD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $12k → 12%COMMUNITY HOPE INC: $15k → 9%MADISON VALLEY CARING AND SHARING: $8k → 10%BEAVERHEAD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $12k → 12%COMMUNITY HOPE INC: $15k → 9%PROJECT HOPE: $9k → 10%BEAVERHEAD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $12k → 12%PROJECT HOPE: $8k → 10%RICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK: $10k → 10%RICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK: $10k → 10%ACTION INC: $70k → 16%ACTION INC: $41k → 16%HELMVILLE COMMUNITY CLUB INC: $10k → 16%HELMVILLE COMMUNITY CLUB INC: $10k → 16%ACTION INC: $40k → 16%ACTION INC: $30k → 16%ACTION INC: $25k → 16%ACTION INC: $25k → 16%NORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK: $10k → 11%TUMBLEWEED: $10k → 9%ACTION INC: $20k → 16%ACTION INC: $20k → 16%TOBACCO VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $12k → 17%ACTION INC: $20k → 16%TOBACCO VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $12k → 17%TOBACCO VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $12k → 17%ACTION INC: $16k → 16%TOBACCO VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $10k → 17%TOBACCO VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $10k → 17%TOBACCO VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $10k → 17%ACTION INC: $15k → 16%TOBACCO VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $10k → 17%FAMILY SERVICE INC: $25k → 9%YELLOWSTONE BOYS AND GIRLS RANCH FOUNDATION: $16k → 9%FAMILY SERVICE INC: $10k → 9%EAGLE MOUNT - BILLINGS: $10k → 9%MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA: $100k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MT
ND
WY
CA
UT
MD
AZ
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18M · 759 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

759 repeat relationships — 404 still active in FY2024, 355 since wound down; 157 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

759
786

Total granted

$18M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+22%

Still filing today

28%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $585k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Mainstreet Uptown Butte Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +62% · 57% of their budget
  • BR
    Butte Rescue Mission
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +160%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $700k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • CE
    CENTRAL EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION OF SILVER BOW
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • GF
    GALLATIN FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -82%
  • MH
    MONTANA HISTORY CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $40k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scenic Montana Trails
—
2
Montana Healthcare Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
4
Eastern Montana Veterans Home Foundation
Human Services
5
Valley Community Emergency Food Bank Inc

Our mission is to end hunger in the valley county, montana area through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. our vision is a montana free from hunger where everyone has equal access to nutritious food.

Food & Nutrition
6
Big Timber Community Food Bank

Area food bank distributions

Food & Nutrition
7
Montana Pediatric Cancer Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Wyoming Food Coalition Wy Food Matters
Food & Nutrition
9
Powell County Senior Citizens Inc

None

—
10
Wellness in Action

The mission of Wellness In Action is to improve community wellbeing by providing a network of mental and behavioral health resources to people who live or work in Big Sky.

Human Services
11
Montana Business Leadership Council

The mblc exists to encourage and enact business-friendly policies that create good-paying jobs and make montana a better place to live. the primary purpose of the mblc is to educate the public on important business issues, enable citizens…

Community Improvement
12
Central Montana Childcare Alliance

Partner with childcare providers, families, and stakeholders to improve the quality of programming and expand the availability of childcare options in central montana.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montana School for the Deaf and Blind Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Bridger Public Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth & Family ServicesEmergency Services & Vetera…Community Development Organ…Healthcare System Support O…Disability Services & Advoc…Youth Sports & Recreation P…Arts and Cultural Organizat…Affordable Housing ProvidersFaith-Based Humanitarian Mi…Native American Community D…Senior Services Organizatio…Wildlife and Watershed Cons…Regional Economic Developme…Rural Rodeo and Equestrian …Regional Arts and History M…Montana Industry Associatio…Faith-Based Community Suppo…School & Library Support Or…Animal Rescue and SanctuaryPrivate Family FoundationsCommunity Food and Senior S…Community Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%9%<5yr12%15%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr18%20%35–55yr14%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%3%<5yr12%10%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr18%37%35–55yr14%9%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%11/606
the rest of the field
9%
663/7,004

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

417 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 417 of the 1,710 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
139
Early backer (in before they grew)
379/417
Grantees still filing
261/417
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Mainstreet Uptown Butte Inc — $1,324,900 · OtherMainstreet Uptown Butte IncButte Rescue Mission — $1,188,000 · OtherButte Rescue MissionCENTRAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $515,000 · Other+144 more — $7,293,200 · Other+144 moreMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC — $518,500 · Food & NutritionMONTANA FOOD BAN…Billings Food Bank Inc — $291,500 · Food & NutritionBillings Food Ba…HELENA FOOD SHARE INC — $287,500 · Food & NutritionHELENA FOOD SHAR…FLATHEAD FOOD BANK INC — $232,500 · Food & NutritionFLATHEAD FOOD BA…MISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER — $205,000 · Food & NutritionMISSOULA FOOD BA…LIVINGSTON FOOD PANTRY OF PARK COUNTY — $155,000 · Food & NutritionLIVINGSTON FOOD …COLUMBIA FALLS FOOD BANK — $78,000 · Food & Nutrition+12 more — $465,500 · Food & Nutrition+12 moreACTION INC — $324,500 · Human ServicesACTION INCGREAT FALLS RESCUE MISSION — $151,000 · Human ServicesGREAT FALL…COMMUNITY HOPE INC — $121,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY …GREATER MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA — $103,500 · Human ServicesGREATER MI…Tobacco Valley Food Pantry — $78,500 · Human ServicesTobacco Va…BEAVERHEAD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC — $78,000 · Human ServicesBEAVERHEAD…FAMILY SERVICE — $78,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SER…YWCA HELENA — $61,500 · Human ServicesNORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK — $56,000 · Human ServicesRICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $53,000 · Human ServicesMadison Valley Caring and Sharing Inc — $48,000 · Human Services+8 more — $248,800 · Human Services+8 moreSPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC — $700,000 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF THE POOL & PARK FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Recreation & SportsPOVERELLO CENTER INC — $192,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY SHELTER OF THE BITTERROOT INC — $39,000 · Housing & ShelterFLATHEAD WARMING CENTER INC — $32,000 · Housing & ShelterSamaritan House Inc — $31,000 · Housing & ShelterSOUTHWESTERN MONTANA FAMILY YMCA INC — $21,500 · Housing & ShelterMONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $69,500 · EducationBUTTE HISTORICAL MEMORIALS INC — $40,000 · EducationCENTRAL MONTANA HEAD START — $33,700 · EducationLEADERSHIP MONTANA INC — $29,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PROVIDENCE — $25,250 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RICHLAND COUNTY — $78,500 · Youth DevelopmentTIKKUN OLAM MINISTRIES INC — $52,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF YELLOWSTONE COUNTY — $49,000 · Youth Development
Other$10,321,100Food & Nutrition$2,233,500Human Services$1,401,800Recreation & Sports$750,000Housing & Shelter$315,500Education$197,950Youth Development$180,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMainstreet Uptown Butte Inc — $1,324,900 over 7y, 57% of budgetButte Rescue Mission — $1,188,000 over 7y, 20% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC — $700,000 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC — $518,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetACTION INC — $324,500 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetButte Emergency Food Bank — $311,000 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetBillings Food Bank Inc — $291,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHELENA FOOD SHARE INC — $287,500 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetFLATHEAD FOOD BANK INC — $232,500 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetMISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER — $205,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetPOVERELLO CENTER INC — $192,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetLIVINGSTON FOOD PANTRY OF PARK COUNTY — $155,000 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetGREAT FALLS RESCUE MISSION — $151,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetPOLSON LOAVES AND FISH PANTRY INC — $147,000 over 6y, 30% of budgetPINTLER PETS — $129,000 over 7y, 13% of budgetMONTANA RESCUE MISSION — $124,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOPE INC — $121,000 over 7y, 33% of budgetLIBBY FOOD PANTRY INC — $118,500 over 7y, 23% of budgetSAGEBRUSH FOOD PANTRY — $108,000 over 7y, 42% of budgetGREAT FALLS FISH INC — $105,000 over 4y, 31% of budgetGREATER MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA — $103,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetTREASURE STATE FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetHelping Hands in Hardin Inc — $95,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetMONTANA HOPE PROJECT INC — $90,000 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetPRODUCERS PARTNERSHIP INC — $85,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetGREAT FALLS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $82,500 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RICHLAND COUNTY — $78,500 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetTobacco Valley Food Pantry — $78,500 over 6y, 17% of budgetBEAVERHEAD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC — $78,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetCOLUMBIA FALLS FOOD BANK — $78,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE — $78,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHAVEN HOUSE — $76,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetRED LODGE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $70,600 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetMONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $69,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetDEER LODGE FOOD PANTRY — $64,000 over 5y, 30% of budgetYWCA HELENA — $61,500 over 4y, 10% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR BILLINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $59,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetYOUTH DYNAMICS INC — $59,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK — $56,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetCUSTER COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $56,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetRICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $53,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetTIKKUN OLAM MINISTRIES INC — $52,500 over 6y, 12% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE POOL & PARK FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetMONTANA GAELIC CULTURAL SOCIETY — $50,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetCarbon County Community Food Bank — $50,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetGALLATIN FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF YELLOWSTONE COUNTY — $49,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMadison Valley Caring and Sharing Inc — $48,000 over 5y, 25% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mainstreet Uptown Butte Inc ↗
  • Who funds Butte Rescue Mission ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Butte Emergency Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Billings Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds HELENA FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds FLATHEAD FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds POVERELLO CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON FOOD PANTRY OF PARK COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds GREAT FALLS RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds POLSON LOAVES AND FISH PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds PINTLER PETS ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds LIBBY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAGEBRUSH FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds GREAT FALLS FISH INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds TREASURE STATE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Helping Hands in Hardin Inc ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA HOPE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PRODUCERS PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT FALLS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RICHLAND COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Tobacco Valley Food Pantry ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dennis & Phyllis Wash…Gianforte Family Char…Montana Community Fou…Headwaters Health Fou…Montana Food Bank Net…Sample Foundation IncTreacy FoundationMontana Healthcare Fo…Oro y Plata FoundationFirst Interstate Banc…The Steele-Reese Foun…The Bill & Rosemary G…
Dennis & Phyllis Washington FoundationMT255.8× affinity226 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Gianforte Family Charitable Trust · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Headwaters Health Foundation of Western Montana · Montana Food Bank Network Inc · Sample Foundation Inc · Treacy Foundation · Montana Healthcare Foundation · Oro y Plata Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Steele-Reese Foundation Xxxxx1004 · The Bill & Rosemary Gallagher Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Town Pump Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 1710 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines