Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Montana · Nonprofit

BUTTE-SILVERBOW COUNCIL ON AGING

BUTTE-SILVERBOW COUNCIL ON AGING (Montana) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $20,000 to it, the largest being TOWN PUMP CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ($15,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$962k
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$20k
Grants received
$335k
Net assets
0/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 2%

Against its field

BUTTE-SILVERBOW COUNCIL ON AGING runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 6,881 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin11% · above the median
Months of reserve4.8mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)3% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,881 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($745k) Expenses 100 ($758k) Net assets 100 ($97k)2018 Revenue 100 ($744k) Expenses 100 ($756k) Net assets 87 ($85k)2019 Revenue 112 ($833k) Expenses 110 ($833k) Net assets 87 ($85k)2020 Revenue 112 ($834k) Expenses 97 ($733k) Net assets 191 ($186k)2021 Revenue 114 ($849k) Expenses 99 ($751k) Net assets 292 ($283k)2022 Revenue 129 ($964k) Expenses 112 ($849k) Net assets 410 ($399k)2023 Revenue 127 ($949k) Expenses 126 ($958k) Net assets 401 ($390k)2024 Revenue 105 ($780k) Expenses 124 ($943k) Net assets 233 ($226k)2025 Revenue 129 ($962k) Expenses 113 ($854k) Net assets 344 ($335k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (129)Expenses (113)Net assets (344)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 65% · 2018 72% · 2019 69% · 2020 75% · 2021 78% · 2022 80% · 2023 78% · 2024 70% · 2025 68%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of BUTTE-SILVERBOW COUNCIL ON AGING’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (83% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 14,844 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$13k
17
$13k
18
$349
19
$101k
20
$98k
21
$115k
22
$9k
23
$163k
24
$108k
25
4.8
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

From the IRS filings of BUTTE-SILVERBOW COUNCIL ON AGING’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BUTTE-SILVERBOW COUNCIL ON AGING leans on a few funders — its largest provides 75% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

75%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of BUTTE-SILVERBOW COUNCIL ON AGING's grant income comes from Montana funders.

MT

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 2 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like BUTTE-SILVERBOW COUNCIL ON AGING

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Montana

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

61% of spending goes to programs.

Program 61%Management 39%Fundraising 0%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BUTTE-SILVERBOW COUNCIL ON AGING: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BUTTE-SILVERBOW COUNCIL ON AGING?
BUTTE-SILVERBOW COUNCIL ON AGING (Montana) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $20,000 to it, the largest being TOWN PUMP CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ($15,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does BUTTE-SILVERBOW COUNCIL ON AGING have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $20,000 in grants to BUTTE-SILVERBOW COUNCIL ON AGING.
Who is the largest funder of BUTTE-SILVERBOW COUNCIL ON AGING?
TOWN PUMP CHARITABLE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $15,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BUTTE-SILVERBOW COUNCIL ON AGING find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Montana. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing