Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Mental Health Association of New York City Inc

To help all people achieve mental and emotional well-being through groundbreaking solutions that deliver high-quality support when, where, and how they need it.

$191M
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$22M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0174% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$295MCivil Rights$48MEducation$27MHuman Services$26MCommunity Improvement$7.2MPhilanthropy$863kCrime & Legal$136kEnvironment$9kReligion$8kOther$139M
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $486k
  • $250k+25 grants · $189M
$4,799,792
Median grant
16
States reached
$172M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTERSTONE$22,178,960
CRISIS TEXT LINE INC$21,334,559
THE TREVOR PROJECT INC$18,471,046
PROTOCALL SERVICES INC$14,161,761
EMPACT - SPC$14,031,672
DEAFLEAD$13,001,713
HOPELINK BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$8,707,663
GRASSROOTS CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER$8,106,463
RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY DBA$6,803,588
RESPONSE CRISIS CENTER$6,511,725
DIDI HIRSCH MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES$5,992,468
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WW$5,779,078
COMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES INC$5,085,711
HEARTLINE$4,957,602
NETCARE ACCESS$4,799,792
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $25.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME: $1.4M → 12%IDAHO SUICIDE PREVENTION HOTLINE: $14k → 8%THE HELP CENTER: $9k → 10%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF BUCKS COUNTY: $18k → 6%CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $823k → 9%STARVISTA: $8k → 7%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SRVCS: $95k → 9%GOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES: $1.2M → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $3.2M → 15%THE CRISIS CENTER OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $35k → 14%COMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD BANK: $4.4M → 15%CRISIS CENTER INC: $10k → 16%CRISIS CONTACT: $9k → 15%TALBERT HOUSE: $1.5M → 16%FRONTLINE SERVICE: $10k → 17%THE OPPORTUNITY ALLIANCE: $15k → 7%FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME: $968k → 12%IDAHO SUICIDE PREVENTION HOTLINE: $8k → 8%THE HELP CENTER: $8k → 10%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOC OF BUCKS COUNTY: $12k → 6%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SRVCS: $84k → 9%GOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES: $337k → 14%COMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD BANK: $4.1M → 15%CRISIS CONTACT: $8k → 15%TALBERT HOUSE: $715k → 16%FRONTLINE SERVICE: $8k → 17%FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME: $438k → 12%CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $163k → 9%GOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES inc: $207k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $308k → 15%COMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD BANK: $3.7M → 15%TALBERT HOUSE: $68k → 16%FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME: $347k → 12%GOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES: $171k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FL INC: $201k → 15%THE CRISIS CNTR OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SRVC: $9k → 14%TALBERT HOUSE: $44k → 16%FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME: $181k → 12%GOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES: $167k → 14%THE CRISIS CENTER OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $8k → 14%FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME: $75k → 12%GOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES: $114k → 14%FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME: $52k → 12%2-1-1 LIFELINE GOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES: $9k → 14%BOYS TOWN NATIONAL HOTLINE: $10k → 12%Goodwill of the Finger Lakes Inc: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$529M · 106 repeat orgs$14M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

106 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 78 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

106
98

Total granted

$529M
$14M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+12%

Still filing today

80%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    CRISIS TEXT LINE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $56M · revenue +19% · 55% of their budget
  • TREVOR PROJECT INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $48M · revenue +2% · 27% of their budget
  • CO
    CENTERSTONE OF TENNESSEE INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $42M · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • CB
    CARELON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC
    one grant, 2024 · $4.9M
  • OD
    OHIO DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION
    one grant, 2021 · $360k
  • PD
    PA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES OMHSAS
    one grant, 2021 · $340k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…

Health
2
Jefferson Community Counseling Cent Dba Discovery Behavioral Healthcare

Discovery behavioral healthcare is a community based health treatment center dedicated to providing state of the art services to foster recovery and resilience in an accessible, respective and caring environment.

Youth Development
3
Crisis Connections

To foster resilience and wellbeing for all by connecting people to accessible and compassionate support.

Health
4
Crisis Line and Referral Service

We envision all people having access to resources that help them to cope or solve their problems. crisis line and referral service provides 24/7 personal, confidential telephone support.

Health
5
Riverside Community Care Inc

We make a difference in the lives of individuals, families, and communities through innovative and compassionate behavioral healthcare and human services.

Health
6
Canvas Health Inc

To be a recognized leader in community mental health, respected for our clinical quality, innovation, and adaptation to a rapidly changing health care and social services environment.

Human Services
7
Family and Children's Services of Centra

To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.

Human Services
8
Contact Lifeline Inc

To provide statewide, 24/7 telephone counseling, information and referral services and crisis intervention services.

Health
9
Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers

Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers, Inc. serves the community behavioral health needs of nine counties of Southern Oklahoma. Lighthouse offers integrated care through their outpatient and Health Home programs to adults and children.…

Health
10
Mental Health Association in Essex County Inc

The mental health association in essex county advocates and assists adults with emotional or psychiatric challenges on their road to recovery, dignity and independence-encourage, empower & overcome.

—
11
The Summit Counseling Center Inc

The Summit Counseling Center, Inc, known as The Summit, provides professional counseling, psychological testing, school-based therapy, mental health awareness & suicide prevention education using an integrative approach to treat the whole…

Human Services
12
South County Mental Health Center Inc

Since its creation in 1974, south county mental health center, inc. "center" has brought quality mental health and substance abuse care to our communities in a manner which enhances and preserves human dignity. through local support,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helpline Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Education Development Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Domestic Violence ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Affordable Housing Developm…Environmental Conservation …Jewish Community Organizati…Community FoundationsAddiction Recovery ServicesUnited Way Affiliates
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr16%34%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%27%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/168
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,397

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

124 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 124 of the 205 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

19
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
32
Early backer (in before they grew)
121/124
Grantees still filing
104/124
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CRISIS TEXT LINE INC — $55,661,525 · HealthCRISIS TEXT LINE INCCENTERSTONE OF TENNESSEE INC — $41,782,706 · HealthCENTERSTONE OF TENNESSEE INCEMPACT-SUICIDE PREVENTION CENTER — $41,306,669 · HealthEMPACT-SUICIDE PREVENTION CENTERCommunity Crisis Services Inc — $17,302,565 · HealthCommunity Crisis Services IncHEARTLINE INC — $16,985,875 · HealthHEARTLINE INCDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE — $15,101,871 · HealthGRASSROOTS CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER CENTER INC — $14,432,402 · HealthLines for Life — $13,540,576 · HealthContact Helpline Inc — $12,370,875 · HealthSOLARI INC — $10,322,190 · Health+51 more — $56,337,312 · Health+51 morePROTOCALL SERVICES INC — $22,700,976 · OtherPROTOCALL SERVICES INCHOPELINK BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $19,748,986 · OtherHOPELINK BEHAVIORAL HEALTHBEACON HEALTH OPTIONS — $17,303,300 · OtherBEACON HEALTH OPTIONSVolunteers of America Western Washington — $16,814,527 · OtherVolunteers of America Wester…RESPONSE OF SUFFOLK COUNTY INC — $14,222,547 · OtherRESPONSE OF SUFFOLK COUNTY I…RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY — $11,963,333 · OtherRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITYCARELON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC — $4,918,765 · Other+103 more — $31,212,343 · Other+103 moreTREVOR PROJECT INC — $47,945,429 · Civil RightsTREVOR PRO…DEAFLEAD — $26,384,476 · Education+1 more — $286,258 · EducationCOMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD BANK — $13,998,072 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $3,685,973 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $3,519,803 · Human ServicesTALBERT HOUSE — $2,373,963 · Human ServicesGOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES INC — $2,226,051 · Human Services+15 more — $444,951 · Human Services211 Tampa Bay Cares Inc — $7,211,372 · Community ImprovementHEART OF FLORIDA UNITED WAY INC — $802,905 · Philanthropy+4 more — $60,500 · Philanthropy
Health$295,144,566Other$138,884,777Civil Rights$47,945,429Education$26,670,734Human Services$26,248,813Community Improvement$7,211,372Philanthropy$863,405

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCRISIS TEXT LINE INC — $55,661,525 over 3y, 55% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $47,945,429 over 3y, 27% of budgetCENTERSTONE OF TENNESSEE INC — $41,782,706 over 4y, 13% of budgetEMPACT-SUICIDE PREVENTION CENTER — $41,306,669 over 4y, 20% of budgetDEAFLEAD — $26,384,476 over 4y, 71% of budgetHOPELINK BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $19,748,986 over 6y, 36% of budgetCommunity Crisis Services Inc — $17,302,565 over 8y, 42% of budgetHEARTLINE INC — $16,985,875 over 4y, 78% of budgetVolunteers of America Western Washington — $16,814,527 over 8y, 7.9% of budgetDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE — $15,101,871 over 8y, 7.4% of budgetGRASSROOTS CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER CENTER INC — $14,432,402 over 4y, 42% of budgetRESPONSE OF SUFFOLK COUNTY INC — $14,222,547 over 5y, 53% of budgetCOMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD BANK — $13,998,072 over 8y, 34% of budgetLines for Life — $13,540,576 over 7y, 39% of budgetContact Helpline Inc — $12,370,875 over 4y, 74% of budgetSOLARI INC — $10,322,190 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetFIRST CHOICE SERVICES INC — $9,755,146 over 3y, 32% of budgetNETCARE CORPORATION — $9,332,229 over 3y, 13% of budget211 Tampa Bay Cares Inc — $7,211,372 over 4y, 33% of budgetWELLSPACE HEALTH — $6,870,358 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetGRYPHON PLACE — $4,904,094 over 3y, 23% of budgetA BETTER WAY SERVICES INC — $4,573,985 over 5y, 29% of budget211 Palm BeachTreasure Coast Inc — $4,359,391 over 7y, 39% of budgetEVERYMIND INC — $3,961,509 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $3,685,973 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetProvident Inc — $3,615,699 over 8y, 15% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $3,519,803 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetREAL CRISIS INTERVENTION INC — $3,255,560 over 7y, 69% of budgetBALTIMORE CRISIS RESPONSE INC — $3,013,769 over 5y, 12% of budgetRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC — $2,640,693 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCRISIS CALL CENTER INC — $2,473,744 over 7y, 36% of budgetTALBERT HOUSE — $2,373,963 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetGOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES INC — $2,226,051 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetCOMMON GROUND — $1,766,976 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetBEHAVIORAL HEALTH RESPONSE INC — $1,759,632 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetEDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $1,645,131 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCONTACT of Mercer County NJ Inc — $1,557,476 over 3y, 75% of budgetHEART OF FLORIDA UNITED WAY INC — $802,905 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetMETRO CRISIS SERVICES INC — $652,246 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetKINGS VIEW — $401,349 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC — $378,566 over 3y, 16% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC — $318,181 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA WABASH VALLEY REGION INC — $289,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetMASA-MEXED INC — $286,258 over 2y, 11% of budgetCONTACT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $260,016 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetHEADQUARTERS KANSAS INC — $248,625 over 3y, 17% of budgetJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $179,326 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTICE INNOVATION INC — $135,613 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CRISIS TEXT LINE INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTERSTONE OF TENNESSEE INC ↗
  • Who funds EMPACT-SUICIDE PREVENTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DEAFLEAD ↗
  • Who funds HOPELINK BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Community Crisis Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLINE INC ↗
  • Who funds Volunteers of America Western Washington ↗
  • Who funds DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds GRASSROOTS CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RESPONSE OF SUFFOLK COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Lines for Life ↗
  • Who funds Contact Helpline Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOLARI INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST CHOICE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NETCARE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds 211 Tampa Bay Cares Inc ↗
  • Who funds WELLSPACE HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds GRYPHON PLACE ↗
  • Who funds A BETTER WAY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds 211 Palm BeachTreasure Coast Inc ↗
  • Who funds EVERYMIND INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds Provident Inc ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds REAL CRISIS INTERVENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE CRISIS RESPONSE INC ↗
  • Who funds RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS CALL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TALBERT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON GROUND ↗
  • Who funds BEHAVIORAL HEALTH RESPONSE INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Link2health Solutions…Council of State and …Association of State …Association of Public…United Way WorldwideThe Crisis Center of …North American Associ…Investor Protection T…Association of Matern…Americares Foundation…The Pew Charitable Tr…Recreational Boating …
Link2health Solutions IncNY32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 3 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Link2health Solutions Inc · Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc · Association of State and Territorial Health Officials · Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc · United Way Worldwide · The Crisis Center of Tampa Bay Inc · North American Association of Central Cancer Registries · Investor Protection Trust · Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs · Americares Foundation Inc · The Pew Charitable Trusts · Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mental Health Association of New York City Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • United Way of Connecticut Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Lines for Life — 70% of income from government
  • Education Development Center Inc — 65% of income from government
  • Samaritans Inc — 31% of income from government
  • Life Crisis Center Inc — 24% of income from government
  • United Way of Tri County Inc — 18% of income from government
  • 211 Palm BeachTreasure Coast Inc — 17% of income from government
  • Northeast Kingdom Human Services Inc — 8% of income from government
  • The Crisis Center of Tampa Bay Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Everymind Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Community Crisis Services Inc — 4% of income from government
  • United Way of Northeast Florida Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Jewish Community Services of South Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Heart of Florida United Way Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Baltimore Crisis Response Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
48report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 205 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines