Skip to content

Virginia · Public charity

Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation

To implement an informed, consensus-based national outreach strategy that will increase participation in recreational angling and boating and thereby increase public awareness and appreciation of the need to protect, conserve and restore this nation's aquatic natural resources.

$198k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
8
Itemized grants FY2025
11
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$109k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$9,275
Largest grant, FY2025
$50,000
Organizations funded a year
10 to 28
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
8
Total assets, FY2025
$289k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving8$109k0%
FY202411$283k0%
FY202316$374k19%
FY202217$362k12%
FY202128$1.0M36%
FY202015$250k40%
FY201912$221k50%
FY201810$175k70%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$1.4MAnimals$1.4MRecreation & Sports$76kCommunity Improvement$55k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
ID
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
California Department of Fish & Wildlife$265,2719n/a
Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency$160,8504n/a
Iowa Department of Natural Resources$155,6196n/a
Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission$145,0005n/a
Arkansas Game and Fish Commission$142,9203n/a
Cape Cod Community College$136,0005n/a
Southeastern Assoc of Fish and Wildlife Agencies Inc$135,00032%
Texas Parks & Wildlife Department$130,5826n/a
Nevada Department of Health and Human Services$116,5605n/a
Va Dept of Wildlife Resources$95,0776n/a
Show all 43 grantees
All grantees of Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
California Department of Fish & Wildlife$265,2719n/a
Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency$160,8504n/a
Iowa Department of Natural Resources$155,6196n/a
Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission$145,0005n/a
Arkansas Game and Fish Commission$142,9203n/a
Cape Cod Community College$136,0005n/a
Southeastern Assoc of Fish and Wildlife Agencies Inc$135,00032%
Texas Parks & Wildlife Department$130,5826n/a
Nevada Department of Health and Human Services$116,5605n/a
Va Dept of Wildlife Resources$95,0776n/a
Northeast Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Inc$89,977222%
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission$89,7874n/a
Kansas Athletics Inc$88,8002n/a
State of Ohio$78,8454n/a
Georgia Department of Natural Resources$77,0004n/a
Nebraska Game and Parks Commission$76,0803n/a
University of Maryland College Park$73,9004n/a
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife$56,7752n/a
State of Arizona$55,0004n/a
Michigan Department of Natural Resources$55,0003n/a
Colorado Energy Office$54,7505n/a
Idaho Public Television$52,3102n/a
Oklahoma Dept of Wildlife Conservation$51,0005n/a
State of Utah Governor's Office of Economic Development$50,0002n/a
Nc Wildlife Resource Commission$44,5254n/a
Vermont Dairy Promo Council$44,0003n/a
FL Fish & Wildlife Conservation$42,6354n/a
Michigan Dep of Health & Human Services$42,6102n/a
South Dakota State University$42,1404n/a
Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies$35,00011%
State of Indiana$32,3932n/a
University of Rhode Island$30,2705n/a
Mississippi Department of Wildlife Fisheries and Parks$25,0001n/a
Commonwealth of Kentucky$25,0001n/a
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources$25,0002n/a
LA Department of Wildlife & Fisheries$22,0001n/a
Washington Dept Of Fish & Wildlife$20,0002n/a
Minnesota Zoo$18,7562n/a
Aquatic Resources Education Association$17,9811n/a
Fish & Wildlife Foundation of Florida I$15,65020%
State of Connecticut$9,2503n/a
NJ Dept of Environmental Protection$6,0002n/a
Alabama Dept of Conservation & Natural Resources Wildlife and Freshwater$5,0002n/a

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Fish and Wildlife FoundationDC55.4× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · American Bar Association · Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc · Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation Inc · Investor Protection Trust · Association of State and Territorial Health Officials · The Pew Charitable Trusts · Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc · The Nature Conservancy · National Assembly of State Arts Agencies Inc · National Association of State Procurement Officals Inc · Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation with peer funders

About Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation

How much does Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation give?
Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation reported 8 itemized grants totaling $109,066, out of $197,923 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 10 and 28 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (48%), Animals (47%), Recreation & Sports (3%).
Who are Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: California Department of Fish & Wildlife ($265k), Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency ($161k), Iowa Department of Natural Resources ($156k).
Does Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, American Bar Association, Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc.
Where is Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation based?
Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation is based in VA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2025, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Recreational Boating and Fishing’s filings →

More from the funding graph