Skip to content

Illinois · Public charity

North American Association of Central Cancer Registries

Naaccr inc. Is a collaborative umbrella organization for cancer registries, governmental agencies, professional associations and private groups in north america interested in enhancing the quality and use of cancer registry data.

$393k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
24
Itemized grants FY2025
19
Organizations funded FY2024
16%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$376k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$17,500
Largest grant, FY2025
$40,600
Organizations funded a year
15 to 23
FY2021 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
24
Total assets, FY2025
$3.5M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 16% of the organizations North American Association of Central Cancer Registries funded were first-time grantees, receiving 29% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving23$361k4%
FY202419$252k16%
FY202315$157k20%
FY202223$229k96%
FY202120$246kn/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$1.1MArts & Culture$73kPublic Benefit$44kEducation$36kEnvironment$19kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
NH
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
OR
NV
WY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
NE
MO
WV
VA
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
GA
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
State of Ohio$80,8504n/a
Arkansas Department of Health$63,6002n/a
University of Miami$61,30030%
Curators of the University of Missouri$54,6003n/a
Oregon Health Authority Public Health Division$54,6003n/a
Pennsylvania Department of Health$43,1002n/a
Centro de Cancer de la Universidad de Puerto Rico$41,4503n/a
Nebraska Game and Parks Commission$39,9505n/a
Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation$39,9504n/a
Michigan Dep of Health & Human Services$39,6002n/a
Show all 28 grantees
All grantees of North American Association of Central Cancer Registries by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
State of Ohio$80,8504n/a
Arkansas Department of Health$63,6002n/a
University of Miami$61,30030%
Curators of the University of Missouri$54,6003n/a
Oregon Health Authority Public Health Division$54,6003n/a
Pennsylvania Department of Health$43,1002n/a
Centro de Cancer de la Universidad de Puerto Rico$41,4503n/a
Nebraska Game and Parks Commission$39,9505n/a
Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation$39,9504n/a
Michigan Dep of Health & Human Services$39,6002n/a
State of Tennessee$37,7502n/a
Wyoming Game & Fish Department$36,5003n/a
State of Maine$34,7504n/a
Department of Public Health & Human Services$34,7504n/a
State Of Alaska$34,7504n/a
West Virginia Department of Health$33,2504n/a
State of Indiana$33,0003n/a
University of North Dakota-College of Business & Public Admin$32,2504n/a
University of Rhode Island$30,5004n/a
South Carolina Network$26,0003n/a
Nevada Department of Health and Human Services$24,5002n/a
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services$22,0003n/a
Minnesota Zoo$18,3001n/a
Texas Department of State Health Services$17,7001n/a
University of Oklahoma$16,5002n/a
University of California Davis$14,0002n/a
State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services$8,7501n/a
Northwest Technical Institute$7,0001n/a

Plus 21 recipients with no EIN on record ($264k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Association of State and Territorial Health OfficialsVA36.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Association of State and Territorial Health Officials · Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc · Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc · Investor Protection Trust · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · American Bar Association · Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs · Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation · The Pew Charitable Trusts · National Assembly of State Arts Agencies Inc · The Institute for Intergovernmental Research Inc · The Mental Health Association of New York City Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare North American Association of Central Cancer Registries with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to North American Association of Central Cancer Registries?

Find your warmest path to North American Association of Central Cancer Registries through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About North American Association of Central Cancer Registries

How much does North American Association of Central Cancer Registries give?
North American Association of Central Cancer Registries reported 24 itemized grants totaling $376,200, out of $392,746 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 15 and 23 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2024.
What does North American Association of Central Cancer Registries fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (84%), Arts & Culture (6%), Public Benefit (3%).
Who are North American Association of Central Cancer Registries's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: State of Ohio ($81k), Arkansas Department of Health ($64k), University of Miami ($61k).
Does North American Association of Central Cancer Registries fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 16% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as North American Association of Central Cancer Registries?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc, Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc.
Where is North American Association of Central Cancer Registries based?
North American Association of Central Cancer Registries is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on North American Association of Central Cancer Registries’ filings →

More from the funding graph