· Public charity
Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs
The mission of the association of maternal & child health programs is to protect and promote the optimal health of women, children, and families.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of ASSOCIATION OF MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH PROGRAMS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 27 grants below total $688,595 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $836,046 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $147,451 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $515k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $149k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $88,847 |
| CAMDEN COALITION OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS | $60,000 |
| ELEPHANT CIRCLE | $49,154 |
| REACHUP INC | $41,250 |
| RESTORING OUR OWN THROUGH TRANSFORMATION (ROOTT) | $38,450 |
| HELUNA HEALTH | $37,500 |
| INSTITUTE OF WOMEN & ETHNIC STUDIES | $35,790 |
| MICHIGAN PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE | $35,250 |
| MAMATOTO VILLAGE | $32,104 |
| MAYA ORGANIZATION | $30,000 |
| BALTIMORE HEALTHY START INC | $30,000 |
| EVERTHRIVE ILLINOIS | $26,324 |
| THE BIRTHING HUT LLC | $25,000 |
| HEALTHY START INC | $18,750 |
| FAMILIES FIRST OF MONROE COUNTY INC | $18,748 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
60 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 50 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $315k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PAPARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC2× · 2020–2021 · $850k · revenue +57%
- CFCENTER FOR HEALTH POLICY DEVELOPMENT5× · 2017–2021 · $256k · revenue +25%
- AOASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL HEALTH OFFICIALS4× · 2018–2021 · $224k · revenue +175%
Funded once
- HDHAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHone grant, 2021 · $221k
- SISISTERSONG INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +29%
- EDE3 DIAGNOSTICS INCone grant, 2021 · $166k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Altarum is focused on improving the health of individuals with fewer financial resources and populations disenfranchised by the health care system. we drive impactful changes in four domains: 1) transform health service delivery - we work…
Healthconnect one (hc one) is the national leader in advancing equitable, community-based, peer-to-peer support for pregnancy, birth, breastfeeding and early parenting. hc one realizes its mission by promoting health equity. we work to…
The national perinatal information center (npic) is dedicated to the improvement of perinatal health through comparative data analysis, program evaluation, health services research and professional continuing education.
The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…
The mission of the association of maternal & child health programs is to protect and promote the optimal health of women, children, and families.
To develop and implement strategies to improve the safety of patient care in maryland. mpsc unites stakeholders to champion patient safety, eliminate preventable harm, and accelerate improvements in safety quality across healthcare.
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…
The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.
See schedule ophrei conducts health research and education that improves the health and well-being of veterans and all people in hawaii, central california, the pacific region, and throughout the u.s. driven by the values of excellence and…
The mission of the new mexico perinatal collaborative is to convene stakeholders to achieve health equity through the promotion of evidence- based reproductive and perinatal health practices that: increase collaboration with communities…
Alliancechicago is the continuation of an existing effort to bring together charitable federally qualified health centers (fqhcs) to collaboratively pursue their charitable missions by better serving their disadvantaged patients with…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Everthrive Illinois and the most unlike its peers is Urban Baby Beginnings dba Ubb. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH QUALITY INC ↗
- Who funds PARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HEALTH POLICY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL HEALTH OFFICIALS ↗
- Who funds SISTERSONG INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY VOICES ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORIES INC ↗
- Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE ALCOHOL AND DRUG AGENCY DIRECTORS INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITED BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE EAR FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds GENETIC ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Camden Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds REACHUP Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AND CITY HEALTH OFFICALS ↗
- Who funds THE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Hands and Voices of Georgia Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Association of State and Territorial Health Officials · Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc · Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · Investor Protection Trust · North American Association of Central Cancer Registries · The Pew Charitable Trusts · National Network of Public Health Institutes Inc · Groundswell Fund · Johns Hopkins University · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Green & Healthy Homes Initiative Inc — 100% of income from government
- National Institute for Children's Health Quality Inc — 100% of income from government
- Postpartum Support International — 43% of income from government
- Baltimore Healthy Start Inc — 43% of income from government
- Family Voices — 39% of income from government
- Trenton Health Team Inc — 31% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Reachup Inc — 16% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
- Connecticut Children's Medical Center — 5% of income from government
- The University of Vermont Medical Center — 1% of income from government
- Children's Forum Inc — 0% of income from government
- Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc — 0% of income from government
- Genetic Alliance Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.