· Private foundation
The McCance Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k86 grants · $186k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $489k
- $50k–250k44 grants · $4.0M
- $250k+5 grants · $2.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated | $1,000,500 |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | $502,805 |
| National Educational Equity Lab | $501,903 |
| Ceres Inc | $250,000 |
| Fishers Island School | $250,000 |
| LIFT Inc | $200,000 |
| The Lighthouse Works | $180,000 |
| Henry L Ferguson Museum | $170,700 |
| Forest Trends Association | $150,000 |
| Island Health Project Inc | $149,000 |
| Lake Wales Charter Schools Foundation | $105,000 |
| Alzheimer's Disease Research Foundation (dba Cure Alzheimer's Fund) | $102,000 |
| Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund | $100,500 |
| Harlem Children's Zone | $100,000 |
| Year Up | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
186 repeat relationships — 125 still active in FY2024, 61 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $183k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED4× · 2020–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +121%- NENational Education Opportunity Network Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +170%
- CICERES INC5× · 2020–2024 · $900k · revenue +66%
Funded once
- MGMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDone grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue -13%
- FPFLORIDA POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +167%
- TMTHE MATCH FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…
At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Prime Coalition Inc and the most unlike its peers is Democracy Works. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
251 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 251 of the 322 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds National Education Opportunity Network Inc ↗
- Who funds MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CERES INC ↗
- Who funds Henry L Ferguson Museum ↗
- Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW PROFIT INC ↗
- Who funds LIFT INC ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HEALTH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds FOREST TRENDS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ECHOING GREEN INC ↗
- Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds WALSH PARK BENEVOLENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds PRIME COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds KIPP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
- Who funds RARE ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE SUMMIT INC ↗
- Who funds THE LIGHTHOUSE WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds Measures for Justice Institute ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE WALES CHARTER SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FISHERS ISLAND COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RSF SOCIAL FINANCE INC ↗
- Who funds SPORTS HUMANITARIAN GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT DRAWDOWN ↗
- Who funds BUSINESSES UNITED IN INVESTING LENDING & DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOODCORPS INC ↗
- Who funds DEPLOYUS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Willinphila Foundation · The Emily Hall Tremaine Foundation Inc · The Fairfield Foundation · The Long Stems Foundation Inc · The Sooner Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · The Duke of Omnium Fund · The Frederic C Hamilton Family Foundation · Ederic Foundation Inc · The Spofford Foundation Inc · W L Lyons Brown Jr Charitable Foundation · The Schmidt Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The McCance Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Hope and Safety Inc — 69% of income from government
- Center for Hope and Safety — 68% of income from government
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution — 63% of income from government
- Greater Bergen Community Action Inc — 62% of income from government
- Lawrence General Hospital — 41% of income from government
- Save the Sound — 37% of income from government
- Bergen Family Center — 25% of income from government
- Metacomet Land Trust Inc — 25% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Up Education Network — 22% of income from government
- Foodcorps Inc — 21% of income from government
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Social Finance Inc — 12% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- The Red Sox Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Scituate Food Pantry Inc — 1% of income from government
- Project Adventure Inc — 1% of income from government
- Friends of Holly Hill Farm Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Epiphany School Inc — 0% of income from government
- Ceres Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The McCance Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The McCance Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.