How much did THE EMILY HALL TREMAINE FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of THE EMILY HALL TREMAINE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

institutionindependentcommissionmuseum artpersonbusinessdarien

2020

visual arttacomasustainable businessforterrapersonchildren's corporationmuseum art

2021

visual artsearly literacyliteracy screenerhaskins laboratoriesenvironment buildingsoccer streetsplains sustainable

2022

visual artenvironment buildinghoustoninternationalgig harborfoodfame

2023

visual artshoustonenvironmentinternationalgig harborfamehope

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 189 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k131 grants · $374k
$10k–50k41 grants · $764k
$50k–250k17 grants · $1.6M

$4,000

Median grant

States reached

$98M

Total assets

Largest grants

THE LEARNING ALLIANCE$155,000
EARLYBIRD EDUCATION$150,000
GREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP$150,000
THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$150,000
SUSTAINABLE CT INC$131,014
AIM ACADEMY$125,000
GREAT PLAINS INSTITUTE$110,000
SUSTAINABLE CT INC$100,000
PA BRANCH INTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION$90,000
FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION$88,527
WETA-TV-FM$75,000
SUSTAINABLE CT INC$58,446
TEACH FOR AMERICA - GREATER PHILADELPHIA$50,000
CONNECTICUT COUNCIL FOR PHILANTHROPY$50,000
WESTMINSTER SCHOOLS INC$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $216k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$16M · 213 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

213 repeat relationships — 130 still active in FY2024, 83 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

213

127

Total granted

$16M

$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%

+52%

Still filing today

70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $237k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SUSTAINABLE CT INC
6× · 2019–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +49% · 41% of their budget
TL
THE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC
6× · 2019–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +126%
CC
CONNECTICUT COUNCIL FOR PHILANTHROPY
5× · 2020–2024 · $260k · revenue +142%

Funded once

SC
SUSTAINABLE CT INC
one grant, 2022 · $389k
GP
GREAT PLAINS INSTITUTE (FISCAL AGENT FOR SUSTAINABLE STATES NETWORK)
one grant, 2022 · $160k
AI
AIR INSTITUTE
one grant, 2021 · $95k · revenue -12% · 53% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Boston Architectural College

Founded 131 years ago, the boston architectural college is a recognized institution providing excellence in practice-integrated design education to members of diverse communities with students representing 35 countries. the bac offers…

—

University of New Haven

See schedule ouniversity of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education

United States Naval Institute

To advance professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power.

—

Currier Gallery of Art

Focused on art, centered in community, committed to inspire.

—

International Center of Photography

The international center of photography is a center where photographs are collected, protected, researched, and exhibited; a place where students of all ages and accomplishments learn to make images and are challenged by technical and…

Arts & Culture

Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education

Connecticut Aeronautical Historical

To present the story of aviation and the human genius that made it possible

Arts & Culture

New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education

Lewis & Clark College

The mission of lewis & clark college is to know the traditions of the liberal arts, to test their boundaries through ongoing exploration, and to hand on to successive generations the tools and discoveries of this quest. by these means, the…

Education

Pennsylvania College of Art & Design

Pennsylvania college of art & design is a professional art college offering a bfa degree, certificates, credentials, and curricula that enable students of all ages to pursue art as their life's work.

Education

The Brooklyn Institute of Arts

Bring people together through art & experiences that inspire celebration, compassion & courage.

Arts & Culture

United States Artists Inc

We believe in artists and their essential role in our society. each year, we award up to fifty $50,000 unrestricted fellowships to the most compelling artists working and living in the united states, in all disciplines, at every stage of…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundation for the Arts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Greentrike. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.7%2/272

the rest of the field

11%

206,162/1,819,293

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

264 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

260/264

Grantees still filing

200/264

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$7,904,002Education$5,809,203Arts & Culture$2,391,730Philanthropy$445,925Health$432,700Community Improvement$377,700Environment$349,225

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fairfield County's Community FoundationCT37.7× affinity21 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation · The Fairfield Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Charlottesville Area Community · The Andy Warhol Foundation for The · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The McCance Foundation · The Russell Family Foundation · The Sooner Foundation · The Willinphila Foundation · W L Lyons Brown Jr Charitable Foundation · Greater Tacoma Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE EMILY HALL TREMAINE FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

31get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: AIR INSTITUTE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~7 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 845010885 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on AIR INSTITUTE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 53% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Emily Hall Tremaine Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Emily Hall Tremaine Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE EMILY HALL TREMAINE FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

264 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2026.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Emily Hall Tremaine Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

THE EMILY HALL TREMAINE FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

264 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2026.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Emily Hall Tremaine Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph